Research Methods Assignment Sample

Introduction

Get free samples written by our Top-Notch subject experts for taking online Assignment Help services.

Perception generally indicates belief, respective views along with understandings of nurses during providing service to patients after completion of training. The topic of this assignment is to critique the article regarding perception of nurses during care services to patients who suffer from Covid-19. The discussion will be based on the methodology used, understandability of concept along with a comparison of other articles on the perceptions of nurses during care service to Covid-19 patients. The critique framework will be used here Holland and Rees critique framework that is important in nursing research for its ability to access questions and details online. Academic and critiquing skills will be key functions of this study for critical analysis of the provided article.

Critical discussion

Application of the Holland and Rees critique framework indicates proper identification of title of an article that is going to be analysed critically. Therefore, it is clear that the provided article has a clear title regarding perception of nurses who provided care services to Covid-19 patients. A section-wise analysis is provided in an abstract that shows the issue of Covid-19 along with use of qualitative data utilisation (Galehdar et al. 2021). Dilemmas are the crucial aspects among nurses during care of Covid-19 that can influence perceptions. In contrast, Sperling (2021) has opined that nurses are at high risk during providing care services to Covid-19 patients. Therefore, it is clear that the abstract of both of these journals provides details about their contents regarding nurses' perception and care service.
The provided article regarding perception of nurses indicates the symptoms of Covid-19 such as fever, nausea, an increase of blood pressure and other issues that are well referenced with data in the introduction section (Galehdar et al. 2021). Identification of those symptoms can be termed as an important aspect through which nurses can treat properly after checking up by the doctor. In contrast, Wang et al. (2020) have said that the psychological condition of Covid-19 patients is not strongly optimistic. Therefore, interpretation of those two articles indicates the following of Holland and Rees framework that supports effective referencing support in data presentation in introduction as well as in background.
The provided article indicates that it has the aim to determine the use of qualitative research for determination of perception of nurses regarding quality of care service (Galehdar et al. 2021). Characteristics of nurses who are associated with patient care are referred for selective care for those Covid-19 patients. In contrast, Gavin et al. (2020) have explained that a complete complement of nurses with minimising the chase of infection during service-related absenteeism is important for maintaining nurse perception. Therefore, this framework is accepted strongly regarding aim determination along with perception determination by reducing health risk during Covid-19 care.
Review of the current literature is done in the provided article as death anxiety; social stigma, hopelessness and orientation of Covid-19 patients are discussed (Galehdar et al. 2021). Isolation of Covid-19 patients during treatment creates an issue of loneliness that a nurse needs to understand during care service. In contrast, Joo and Liu (2021) have opined that Covid-19 is a highly spreading disease as nurses are at high risk as they are the largest supportive workforce in healthcare. Therefore, recent literature analysis indicates support of the online search using Holland and Rees framework that provides effective details about recent risk factors of nurses during Covid-19 care. Therefore, a recent analysis of literature is present in the provided article however; more details can improve its importance regarding perception determination of nurses.
Methods include qualitative study such as an interview of 20 nurses among which 15 are women and 5 are men based on their experience in Covid-19 care in hospitals (Galehdar et al. 2021). Maintenance of ethical aspects along with the use of snowball approach has maintained trustworthiness of the selection of nurses. In contrast, Tan et al. (2020) have argued that demographic characteristics associated with medical care experience are important to select participants that are presented in this article. Therefore, qualitative research and proper methodological design are selected in both of the articles for maintaining apparent positivity in research.
Purposeful sampling strategy is presented in the provided article that shows selection of nurses to determine perceptions based on experience in Covid-19 wards (Galehdar et al. 2021). Education and training are two important aspects for nurses during care service to patients. In contrast, Schroeder et al. (2020) have said that purposive sampling is the selected sampling method that indicates selection of participants based on skill and Covid-19 care experience. Therefore, the provided journals are well managed in the sampling method during selection of nurses.
Reliability is well achieved in the provided article as it contains recent data regarding nurse perceptions. Fear of death is reported as the main stress of patients that needs to be handled by nurse (Galehdar et al. 2021). Therefore, understanding of service requirements for Covid-19 patients is mentioned here properly along with reliability and credibility of data of interview. In contrast, Blake et al. (2020) have opined that the digital package of learning for health workers and nurses has helped in gaining knowledge on Covid-19 are along with a reduction strategy of psychological impacts. Therefore, this article is more appropriate in terms of accuracy, result and understanding compared to the other article mentioned here.
Conclusion of this provided article indicates requirement of comprehensive care service by nurses to determine perception of patient care (Galehdar et al. 2021). Conclusion generally indicates a summary of findings of research to identify potential achievements. In contrast, Vizheh et al. (2020) have opined that psychological wellbeing is important to receive fast from Covid-19 which is a proper conclusion regarding nurses perception. Therefore, this article is good enough as per Holland and Rees framework analysis of critique.

Conclusion

The concept of nurse perception is the main aspect of this study that includes critical analysis of provided articles with other existing articles. Complete details are mentioned in the abstract part of the provided article that indicates effective training is required for improvement of perceptions of nurses during Covid-19 care service. The aim of this research is authentic based on research questions to determine the importance of qualitative analysis for determining the topic of this research. Interviews of nurses are taken for gathering data that is supported by the other articles here. The importance of simple random sampling along with accuracy in discussion in this article has made it accurate. However, recommendations regarding data representation, more accurate discussion and maintenance of proper reliability strategy can make this article more purposeful.

Reference list

Blake, H., Bermingham, F., Johnson, G. and Tabner, A., 2020. Mitigating the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a digital learning package. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(9), p.2997.
Galehdar, N., Toulabi, T., Kamran, A. and Heydari, H., 2021. Exploring nurses' perception of taking care of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID?19): A qualitative study. Nursing Open, 8(1), pp.171-179.
Gavin, B., Hayden, J., Adamis, D. and McNicholas, F., 2020. Caring for the psychological well-being of healthcare professionals in the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. Ir Med J, 113(4), p.51.
Joo, J.Y. and Liu, M.F., 2021. Nurses’ barriers to caring for patients with COVID?19: a qualitative systematic review. International nursing review, 68(2), pp.202-213.
Schroeder, K., Norful, A.A., Travers, J. and Aliyu, S., 2020. Nursing perspectives on care delivery during the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. International journal of nursing studies advances, 2, p.100006.
Sperling, D., 2021. Ethical dilemmas, perceived risk, and motivation among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nursing Ethics, 28(1), pp.9-22.
Tan, B.Y., Chew, N.W., Lee, G.K., Jing, M., Goh, Y., Yeo, L.L., Zhang, K., Chin, H.K., Ahmad, A., Khan, F.A. and Shanmugam, G.N., 2020. Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers in Singapore. Annals of internal medicine, 173(4), pp.317-320.
Vizheh, M., Qorbani, M., Arzaghi, S.M., Muhidin, S., Javanmard, Z. and Esmaeili, M., 2020. The mental health of healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 19(2), pp.1967-1978.
Wang, H., Liu, Y., Hu, K., Zhang, M., Du, M., Huang, H. and Yue, X., 2020. Healthcare workers’ stress when caring for COVID-19 patients: An altruistic perspective. Nursing ethics, 27(7), pp.1490-1500.