Individual Differences and Mental Health Case Study

• Type Case Study
• Downloads561
• Pages16
• Words3955

Introduction: Mental Health and Workplace Stress in MS’s Case

Mental health stems from the interaction of many biological, psychological, and sociological factors that help or disintegrate the health of a person. In this essay, I analyze the case of MS, a 38-year-old senior partner in a law firm who suffers from high workplace stress, loss of interest in her career, and problems with her eating behaviours. Although MS is of normal weight, she suffers from binge eating disorder-- a compulsion to overeat followed by extreme guilt. She has been trying to get the help of health professionals, but at best, her efforts have been ignored, which only adds to her emotional suffering. To evaluate MS’s condition, this essay would utilize the Cognitive-Behavioral Model for mental health pathology. Understanding the relationship between MS's thoughts emotions and behaviour patterns remains crucial when discussing her stress-oriented eating along with its resulting restrictive behaviours. The analytic approach of CBT examines her distress through a study of her maladaptive responses as well as her problematic thought patterns to develop suitable treatment. The first part of this paper explains how CBT interprets MS's challenges while the second section discusses verification methods and the final section presents suitable treatment solutions. A holistic multidisciplinary approach must be employed for proper mental healthcare treatment of patients like MS according to the case analysis.

To help students grasp assignment structure and enhance academic skills, through our assignment help in UK, guidance is provided while maintaining original work. The Individual Differences and Mental Health Case Study demonstrates systematic analysis of psychological factors, critical evaluation, and thoughtful discussion of mental health concepts. These resources are intended solely for study and reference purposes.

Discussion on MS’s Mental Health

MS’s case shows how work stress, negative thoughts, and disordered eating are interconnected. Using the Cognitive-Behavioral Model helps explain her cycle of distress and highlights the need for targeted interventions.

Interpretation and Explanation of MS’s Experiences

The Cognitive Behavioural Model (CBT) is an organized way to comprehend MS's challenges. CBT is defined as a recursive relationship among thoughts, feelings, and behaviours which often serve the development of negative cycles. In MS’s situation, her employment-related stress, eating disorders, and self-image problems are explainable by this model. As a senior partner at a law firm, MS is subject to increasing amounts of stress. Stress in the workplace poses one of the most serious risks to well-being and one’s mental health, especially anxiety, depression, and burnout (Sarkar et al. 2024). These individual differences help explain why her emotional and behavioural responses, like emotional eating, may be more pronounced compared to others under similar stress. After a colleague left the firm, the expansion in her responsibilities caused an undue amount of stress that made her feel overwhelmed and exhausted. Using cognitive behaviour therapy, MS’s stress encourages maladaptive beliefs such as catastrophizing and perfectionism. Numerous positive emotions are too painful for phrases, with negative emotions like self-harm, overexertion at work, and emotional eating being the coping strategies. Chronic stress from work lowers the ability to think, reason, or control one’s emotions which causes cognitive impairment and makes it difficult to make decisions or manage emotions (Arnsten and Shanafelt, 2021). In combination with MS’s lack of balance between work and life, her lack of control makes her feel weak, adding to a cycle that makes coping and dealing with stress even more difficult.

Individual Differences and Mental Health Case Study

Liked This Case Study? Hire Me Now

Alan White 10 Years | MSc

The more tasks that MS takes on leads not only to emotional fatigue but also to cognitive overload, further reducing her ability to effectively manage stress. High responsibilities in a job also come with adverse effects as it is known to increase cortisol levels, which leads to anxiety, fatigue, and emotional regulation (Andreadi et al. 2025). Distortions such as self-imposed pressure and blindly depicting a situation. These coping mechanisms are detrimental to mental health as they lead to increased emotional dysregulation, giving MS a greater risk of negative coping strategies, such as binge eating. Aligning with the cognitive dissonance due to burnout, she feels suffocated and unable to leave work. MS is in a situation where she assumes she must continue acting as if she cares while internally battling with the notion of being extremely passionate about the role leading to greater internal conflict and distress.

MS presents with binge-restrict cycles, characteristic of emotional and disordered eating patterns. MS has an insatiable desire to eat “unhealthy” foods and then feels guilty and eats very little after. The CBT model suggests that maladaptive thought patterns result in disordered eating behaviours (Schaffer et al. 2024). MS suffers from stress which always brings negative automatic thoughts followed by an emotional response (guilt, anxiety) and some consequent behaviour. This cycle continues to repeat itself and increases her distress highlighting the role of individual differences in mental health. Research suggests that stress-induced binge eating is one of the ways to cope with emotional dysregulation (Smith et al. 2021). During high stress, the brain engages in reward-seeking, causing food which is high in calories to feel good. The guilt after the binge reinforces the restriction that follows. Furthermore, MS’s orthorexic tendencies are also shown in her rigid classification of foods into “healthy” and “unhealthy”. These cognitive distortions increase the level of anxiety around food and heighten the likelihood of disordered eating.

M.S.’s difficulty managing her eating habits results in cognitive dissonance because it is in opposition to the image of the disciplined, strong-willed person she perceives herself to be. In simpler terms, her self-discipline collides with her uncontrollable craving for food. Cognitive Dissonance Theory argues that people feel discomfort when their actions do not align with their beliefs, often causing them to change either their actions or views (Harmon‐Jones et al. 2024). In MS's case, the dissonance results in feeling guilty, engaging in self-criticism, and trying to strictly control her diet. While her effort of not eating is in an attempt to regain control, ironically, it makes binge eating worse, therefore worsening the cycle. Research on CBT suggests that self-perception conflicts are also relevant contributors to esteem and perfectionism issues (Khossousi et al. 2024). In this case, M.S. appears to derive a disproportionate amount of self-esteem from control and achievement, making her “failure” in terms of eating catastrophically distressing.

Memo has tried to find help, but after their concerns were ignored, they have become more hesitant to seek further aid. These encounters help to illuminate her suffering in further detail, especially as previous research suggests that certain types of therapeutic encounters can be so invalidating, that they discourage help-seeking altogether (Bergen et al. 2022). CBT would categorize her negative core beliefs concerning help-seeking. Such assumptions are likely to maintain her aversion to professional help and to unravel the distress she experiences. MS's reluctance in referring her to a dietitian indicates that she is further deeply afraid of being dismissed or misunderstood. The CBT paradigm assumes that negative past experiences shape present thinking reliance on the professionals has only strengthened these negative help-seeking beliefs alongside low self-esteem (Pearson, 2021). With regards to the Cognitive-Behavioral Model, MS's difficulties can be understood as stemming from stress-related maladaptive self-ideas, emotional dysregulation, and reinforcement of dysfunctional eating patterns.

Methods to Validate Interpretation

To guarantee that the analyses concerning MS's experiences are correct, it is necessary to utilize accurate interpretation of MS experiences through evidence-based assessment techniques. Within confirmation of her distress, workplace-related stress, disordered eating behaviours, and cognitive dissonance are examined as possible factors through the use of standard psychological instruments, diagnostic definitions, and qualitative data.

Evaluating MS’s cognitive schemas, emotional pathology, and behavioural reactions requires a systematic clinical interview with a trained mental health professional. While doing so the therapist can utilize cognitive-behavioural interviewing techniques with a focus on MS’s perception towards work-related stress, eating behaviours, self-image, and previous mental health interactions. Automatic processes, maladaptive assumptions, and emotional eating patterns can be revealed through open-ended questions (Brown et al. 2024Recognising these individual differences ensures that evaluation and treatment plans are tailored effectively to her specific mental health needs. Along with these, self-report instruments can capture meaningful information regarding MS’s psychological status. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is useful in determining an individual’s level of stress and their capacity to cope with it. While the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) investigates binge eating, restrictiveness and distress over food, it also partakes in such evaluation (Alexander et al. 2024). Other tools include the Cognitive Distortions Scale (CDS) which diagnoses the presence of over-exaggeration, perfectionism, and dichotomous thinking as well as the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) determines the rate of occupational burnout, emotional exhaustion, and diminishing work performance.

In assessing whether MS's eating habits meet clinical requirements, the DSM-55 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) and ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases serve as criteria guidelines (Who.int, 2025). Binge Eating Disorder (BED) in the DSM-5 is defined by recurrent episodes of binge eating that are accompanied by a sense of distress, but without compensatory behaviours, such as purging. Even though MS is within the healthy weight range, she is experiencing episodes of uncontrollable eating followed by guilt which suggests subclinical BED. She, however, does not perform compensatory behaviours which distinguishes her from bulimia nervosa. Because MS meets some, but not all full criteria for eating disorder diagnosis of distressing subclinical conditions, MS may fall under Other Specified Feeding or eating disorder (OSFED), a category for atypical diagnosis that is still clinically significant (Krug et al. 2023).

While assessing MS, both qualitative and quantitative approaches have their pros and cons. For example, standardized self-report questionnaires provide measurable data about stress, cognitive distortions, and eating behaviours (Doom et al. 2024). In this case, stress and cognitive distortions along with eating behaviours self-reported by MS can be compared to clinical standards and results retrieved objectively. These methods, however, might miss the complexity of MS’s emotional distress and her feelings of control over the situation. With qualitative approaches like clinical interviews and journal exercises, MS’s thought processes along with the emotional struggles she encounters can be deeply understood. The amalgamation of both approaches would provide an all-encompassing understanding of MS’s mental health. It is equally relevant to address possible biases and limitations in the evaluation of MS's condition. Self-report strategies may suffer from response bias, especially when MS is too ashamed to accurately explain his behaviours or excessively explains them. Sometimes clinician bias interferes with propers assessments because of prior knowledge that MS’s concerns were usually ignored by clinicians who did not consider her eating patterns important. To manage these biases, it is imperative to use self-report methods and clinical data and observations. Moreover, MS’s difficulties might be better understood through time-based assessment of their onset, duration, and frequency. Through the use of clinical interviews, regular assessment instruments, and the diagnosis of a case with a blend of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, the comprehensive validation of MS mental health issues is possible.

Possible Support and Treatment Options

Based on the interpretation of MS’s struggles through a cognitive-behavioural lens, several treatment and support options could help address her stress, disordered eating behaviours, and emotional well-being. Given her work-related burnout, emotional distress, and maladaptive coping mechanisms related to food, an integrative approach combining psychological interventions, lifestyle modifications, and workplace adjustments would be most beneficial. This section explores these potential interventions while critically evaluating their effectiveness.

The primary psychological treatment that would be indicated for MS is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, which is often used in the context of managing stress and disordered eating. CBT assists patients in recognizing negative thought patterns that lead to emotional pain (Hay et al. 2022). For MS, this therapy could address her control and self-discipline cognitive distortions by changing her understanding of losing control over eating to being “a personal failure.” Moreover, CBT could help her recognize stressors within her workplace that are more harmful and help her find more adaptive ways to cope that do not involve food restriction or binge eating. CBT has been demonstrated in the literature to be very helpful in controlling binge-eating activities and associated disorders. It is reported that many patients undergoing CBT experience decreases in the number of binge-eating incidents and improvements in emotional self-control (Moghimi et al. 2022). Nonetheless, one drawback of CBT is that it requires the patient’s involvement and effort, which might be difficult in light of MS’s busy work schedule and time constraints.

Another useful treatment option might be Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), which increases psychological flexibility while reducing experiential avoidance (Zakiei et al. 2021). ACT is especially useful for MS, as she feels a great deal of guilt and self-judgment about her eating habits because ACT helps people accept difficult emotions rather than try to avoid or suppress them. MS’s self-worth is tied to controlling her perfectionistic beliefs, and ACT has the potential to separate those rigid beliefs by fostering self-worth through mindfulness and values-based action. There is proof that ACT is beneficial for coping with stress, burnout, and maladaptive eating behaviour (Urbón and Salavera, 2023). ACT's downside is that it can be hard for people to use all the strategies of acceptance with which they wholeheartedly agree since MS has long relied on self-discipline as a tool of coping.

Therefore, anyone in distress would find MBSR techniques as a great addition to the everyday routine. The combination of active meditation and other stress-relieving methods, such as MBSR, will winch out very effectively when it comes to those people suffering from a stressful and exhausting workplace like MS. Studies suggest that MBSR is very effective in fighting symptoms of anxiety, depression, and burnout (Conversano et al. 2021). Lowering the level of stress MS undergoes daily would greatly help her regulate her eating habits by becoming more in tune with the body’s hunger and fullness signals. Reduced impulsive binge episodes would help the individual seek balance and overcome emotional distress. The results of MBSR rely heavily on consistent implementation, which, given her busy lifestyle, could prove difficult. If maintaining a commitment to guided mindfulness sessions proves hard for MS, she could rely on simpler options like meditations or breathing exercises that are easier to integrate into her schedule.

Concerning psychological interventions, and if MS’s distress becomes overwhelming, medical or psychiatric support could be considered. While she does not meet the criteria at the moment for a clinical eating disorder, a psychiatric consultation might establish whether she has some level of anxiety or depression which could be contributing to her problems. It has been reported that in some cases, used to treat anxiety and depression, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) aid in reducing binge-eating behaviours Due to improved impulse control and mood regulation of those patients (Colombo et al. 2021). In any case, medicine should not be the primary course of action but should only be considered to help relieve MS’s emotional distress. There are many reasons to be cautious about psychiatric medication, and one of the most important is that they do not aspect of the problem that is causing her so much strife, meaning that without therapy she may continue to suffer from distorted perceptions and stress-induced ailments.

As MS faces distress due to workplace stress, it is vital to make lifestyle and workplace changes. The constant stress along with feeling burnt out is related to higher rates of emotional exhaustion, poor mental health, and other negative coping strategies (Edú-Valsania et al. 2022). To avoid the buildup of stress, MS can start using the delegate approach at work. She might also want to implement stronger work-life boundaries, like not answering work emails at night or taking breaks during the work day. Research indicates better mental health outcomes with less job strain and greater flexibility in the work environment (Shiri et al. 2022). These modifications, however, depend on external elements including the organizational culture of the firm and MS’s readiness to push for change. If MS is feeling guilty about assigning work to her colleagues, therapy might help in changing her views regarding responsibility and self-identity.

In addition to job-related modifications, self-care activities should also be encouraged to strengthen MS’s emotional coping skills. Ample attention is needed to make work enjoyable and engaging; this includes physical exercise, creative art endeavours, and socialization (Kumar et al. 2024). These activities, apart from relieving stress, help restore emotional equilibrium. Active engagement in regular physical exercise is shown to relieve stress and enhance emotional regulation, thus it could be an important part of MS’s coping skills. On the contrary, if MS is dealing with perfectionism in terms of health and fitness, there would have to be caution that working out does not turn into another self-inflicted pressure point.

Dealing with MS’s eating habits goes deeper than simply asking her to eat healthy as her previous mental healthcare providers suggested. Besides dietary modifications, therapeutic approaches such as intuitive eating counselling can be beneficial towards improving MS's dietary habits. The concept of intuitive eating is to encourage people to eat as per their body’s hunger and satiety signals rather than inflexible food rules to help reduce binge eating and the related guilt that follows (Jańczyk et al. 2025). If MS acknowledges the need for assistance with her eating patterns, working with a psychologist who is an expert in these matters can be more helpful than a dietitian when her problem is mainly psychological.

When analyzing the effectiveness of these methods, it's clear that they all have pros and cons. psychological approaches like CBT, ACT, and MBSR have some mental-based strategies that attend to MS’s cognitive distortions and stress behaviours. However, these approaches require MS to be motivated to participate in therapy for a long duration. While psychiatric aid has some benefit in reducing non-disabling distressing symptoms, it should never replace the therapeutic intervention of choice. Adjustments in the workplace along with self-care activities are important in managing chronic stress (Barnett and Homany, 2022). However, the work context for MS poses some barriers. Lastly, psychological and behavioural approaches should be the focus of attention for nutrition rather than simplistic approaches of just changing diets.

Conclusion

In conclusion, MS’s case illustrates the braiding of work-related issues, stress, and abnormal eating patterns intertwined with cognitive dissonance. Applying the principles of the cognitive-behavioural theory, it is possible to analyze her difficulties in terms of unhelpful coping strategies formulated in response to unhealthy levels of professional demands, emotional burnout, and self-expectations. It appears that the stress she undergoes adds to her feelings of losing control over eating, which leads to greater self-blame and negative evaluation, thus fueling the cycle of self-imposed food deprivation followed by binge eating. Furthermore, her previous interactions with mental health clinicians were rather dismissive, and that has contributed to her reluctance to get help. It is pertinent to be theory-driven in addressing the challenges that MS poses. Psychological methods like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) have sophisticated techniques for enhancing emotional regulation, stress reduction, and re-framing negative thoughts. Moreover, self-care efforts and workplace changes can mitigate feelings of burnout, while counselling on intuitive eating assists in fostering a more positive approach to eating disorder distress. Most people experiencing symptom deterioration approach psychiatrists however therapy remains as the main therapeutic option. The situation proves that medical interventions for mental health need to move past basic dietary recommendations to suit each patient uniquely. Healthcare providers working with mental health patients must understand that eating behavior is complex alongside stress responses because this knowledge supports their delivery of effective scientific treatment.

References

• Alexander, T., Burnette, C.B., Cory, H., McHale, S. and Simone, M., 2024. The need for more inclusive measurement to advance equity in eating disorders prevention. Eating disorders, 32(6), pp.798-816.
• Andreadi, A., Andreadi, S., Todaro, F., Ippoliti, L., Bellia, A., Magrini, A., Chrousos, G.P. and Lauro, D., 2025. Modified Cortisol Circadian Rhythm: The Hidden Toll of Night-Shift Work. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(5), p.2090.
• Arnsten, A.F. and Shanafelt, T., 2021, March. Physician distress and burnout: the neurobiological perspective. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 96, No. 3, pp. 763-769). Elsevier.
• Barnett, J.E. and Homany, G., 2022. The new self-care: It’s not all about you. Practice Innovations, 7(4), p.313.
• Bergen, C., Bortolotti, L., Tallent, K., Broome, M., Larkin, M., Temple, R., Fadashe, C., Lee, C., Lim, M.C. and McCabe, R., 2022. Communication in youth mental health clinical encounters: Introducing the agential stance. Theory & Psychology, 32(5), pp.667-690.
• Brown, D.J., Hagger, M.S. and Hamilton, K., 2024. A qualitative investigation of individuals’ lay representations of habit. Psychology & Health, pp.1-22.
• Colombo, D., Díaz‐García, A., Fernandez‐Álvarez, J. and Botella, C., 2021. Virtual reality for the enhancement of emotion regulation. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28(3), pp.519-537.
• Conversano, C., Orrù, G., Pozza, A., Miccoli, M., Ciacchini, R., Marchi, L. and Gemignani, A., 2021. Is mindfulness-based stress reduction effective for people with hypertension? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 years of evidence. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(6), p.2882.
• Doom, J.R., Deer, L.K., Mickel, T., Infante, A. and Rivera, K.M., 2024. Eating behaviors as pathways from early childhood adversity to adolescent cardiometabolic risk. Health Psychology, 43(6), p.448.
• Edú-Valsania, S., Laguía, A. and Moriano, J.A., 2022. Burnout: A review of theory and measurement. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(3), p.1780.
• Harmon‐Jones, E., Matis, S., Angus, D.J. and Harmon‐Jones, C., 2024. Does effort increase or decrease reward valuation? Considerations from cognitive dissonance theory. Psychophysiology, 61(6), p.e14536.
• Hay, P., Palavras, M.A., da Luz, F.Q., dos Anjos Garnes, S., Sainsbury, A., Touyz, S., Appolinario, J.C. and Claudino, A.M., 2022. Physical and mental health outcomes of an integrated cognitive behavioural and weight management therapy for people with an eating disorder characterized by binge eating and a high body mass index: a randomized controlled trial. BMC psychiatry, 22(1), p.355.
• Jańczyk, N., Jankowska, M., Baran, K., Winkowska, A., Mędrysa, K., Pokrzepa, J.J., Presak, M., Blecharz, G., Szwech, J. and Pograniczny, M., 2025. The Art of Eating: Nourishing Instincts and Balancing Intuitive Eating. Quality in Sport, 38, pp.58248-58248.
• Khossousi, V., Greene, D., Shafran, R., Callaghan, T., Dickinson, S. and Egan, S.J., 2024. The relationship between perfectionism and self-esteem in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, pp.1-20.
• Krug, I., Fernández-Aranda, F., Ghahraman Moharrampour, N. and Rozenblat, V., 2023. Outcome: Other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED). In Eating disorders: An international comprehensive view (pp. 1-15). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Kumar, V., Pavitra, K.S. and Bhattacharya, R., 2024. Creative pursuits for mental health and well-being. Indian journal of psychiatry, 66(Suppl 2), pp.S283-S303.
• Moghimi, E., Davis, C., Bonder, R., Knyahnytska, Y. and Quilty, L., 2022. Exploring women's experiences of treatment for binge eating disorder: methylphenidate vs. cognitive behavioural therapy. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 114, p.110492.
• Pearson, D.J., 2021. Developing a Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy Treatment Programme Designed to Promote Hopefulness and Self-Esteem in Mental Health Service Users Recently Diagnosed with a Psychotic Illness: A Pilot Study to Explore Service-Users’ Experiences of Accessibility, Engagement and Efficacy. University of Derby (United Kingdom).
• Sarkar, S., Menon, V., Padhy, S. and Kathiresan, P., 2024. Mental health and well-being at the workplace. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(Suppl 2), pp.S353-S364.
• Schaffer, V., Huckstepp, T. and Kannis-Dymand, L., 2024. Awe: A systematic review within a cognitive behavioural framework and proposed cognitive behavioural model of awe. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 9(1), pp.101-136.
• Shiri, R., Turunen, J., Kausto, J., Leino-Arjas, P., Varje, P., Väänänen, A. and Ervasti, J., 2022, May. The effect of employee-oriented flexible work on mental health: a systematic review. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 5, p. 883). MDPI.
• Smith, K.E., Mason, T.B., Schaefer, L.M., Anderson, L.M., Critchley, K., Crosby, R.D., Engel, S.G., Crow, S.J., Wonderlich, S.A. and Peterson, C.B., 2021. Dynamic stress responses and real-time symptoms in binge-eating disorder. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(8), pp.758-768.
• Urbón, E. and Salavera, C., 2023. Emotional Education as Coping Strategy for Exhaustion and Dysfunctional Eating Habits. Social Sciences, 12(8), p.447.
• Who.int (2025), “The ICD-10 Classification” Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/37958/9241544228_eng.pdf [Accessed on: 25.03.2025]
• Zakiei, A., Khazaie, H., Rostampour, M., Lemola, S., Esmaeili, M., Dürsteler, K., Brühl, A.B., Sadeghi-Bahmani, D. and Brand, S., 2021. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) improves sleep quality, experiential avoidance, and emotion regulation in individuals with insomnia—results from a randomized interventional study. Life, 11(2), p.133.