Unit 1 Financial Reporting Assignment Sample

Explore Unit 1 Financial Reporting assignment sample covering sole traders, partnerships, cash flows, error correction, accounting concepts and ratio analysis for strong coursework and exam prep.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Type Assignment
  • Downloads555
  • Pages47
  • Words11671

Task 1: Financial Statements for Sole Traders and Partnerships

This section explains how to prepare financial statements for sole traders and partnerships, including the income statement, statement of financial position, and partnership appropriation and capital accounts, with clear workings and explanations. It covers key adjustments like depreciation, accruals, prepayments, drawings, and interest on capital, helping you understand how to present a true and fair view of the business’s performance and position. This assignment sample follows UK accounting standards and conventions, making it a useful reference for students studying financial reporting and seeking assignment help in uk. Use this structured approach to build confidence in preparing accurate and well-presented financial statements.

Financial Statements for a Sole Trader

Statement of Financial Position at 31 December 20X2

Non-Current Assets

Category Cost (£) Accumulated Depreciation (£) Net Book Value (£)
Equipment & Machinery 100,000 10,000 90,000
Total Non-Current Assets 100,000 10,000 90,000

Adjustments:

  • Depreciation of £10,000 has been deducted from the original cost to reflect wear and tear.
  • The net book value represents the remaining value after depreciation.

Current Assets

Category Amount (£)
Inventory 9,200
Receivables 7,600
Prepayments 600
Bank 4,000
Total Current Assets 21,400
Total Assets £111,400

Adjustments:

  • Receivables include outstanding customer balances that are yet to be collected.
  • Prepayments reflect expenses paid in advance, such as rent or insurance.

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

Current Liabilities

Category Amount (£)
Payables 8,800
Accruals 2,800
Total Current Liabilities 11,600
 Net Current Assets (Total Current Assets - Current Liabilities)  £9,800
Total Assets Less Current Liabilities £99,800
  • The loan is classified as non-current since it is repayable beyond one year.

Non-Current Liabilities

Category Amount (£)
Interest-Free Loan from Dad 6,000
Total Non-Current Liabilities 6,000
Net Assets (Total Assets Less Total Liabilities) £93,800

Adjustments:

  • Drawings reduce the owner’s capital as they represent funds taken from the business for personal use.
  • The closing capital equals net assets, ensuring the balance sheet is balanced.

Financed By:

Category Amount (£)
Opening Capital (1st January 20X2) 75,000
Add: Profit for the Year 19,700
Less: Drawings (Including Goods for Own Use) (900)
Closing Capital £93,800

Note: Closing capital should match the value of net assets.

Income Statement (Profit and Loss Account) for the Year Ended 31 December 20X2

Sales and Gross Profit Calculation

Category Amount (£)
Sales Revenue 160,000
Less: Cost of Sales
Opening Inventory 3,300
Add: Purchases 109,100
Less: Closing Inventory (9,200)
Total Cost of Goods Sold (103,200)
Gross Profit £56,800

Operating Expenses

Expense Type Amount (£)
Rent 24,000
Electricity 3,800
Business Rates 3,400
Depreciation 5,000
Irrecoverable Debts (Bad Debts) 900
Total Expenses (37,100)
Net Profit for the Year £19,700

Explanation of Key Adjustments and Concepts

Period-End Adjustments

Adjustments ensure that the financial statements present an accurate and fair view of the business.

Depreciation

Depreciation spreads the cost of fixed assets over their useful life. The straight-line method is used:

Irrecoverable Debts

A sum of £900 is written off as a bad debt, reducing the trade receivables.

Accruals and Prepayments

  • Prepayments (£600): Paid in advance and recorded as an asset.
  • Accruals (£2,800): Expenses incurred but not yet paid, recorded as a liability.

Owner’s Drawings

  • Drawings of £900 reduce the capital account but do not affect the income statement.

Financial Statements for a Partnership

Partnership: Hodgins & Co.

For the Year Ended 31 December 20X2

Income Statement (Profit and Loss Account)

This statement summarizes the revenues and expenses of the partnership to determine the net profit available for distribution.

Category Amount (£)
Sales Revenue 600,000
Less: Cost of Sales
Opening Inventory 5,000
Add: Purchases 120,000
Less: Closing Inventory (8,000)
Total Cost of Goods Sold (117,000)
Gross Profit 483,000
Less: Operating Expenses
Wages and Salaries 106,000
Rent 42,000
Heating and Lighting 6,000
Sundry Expenses 12,000
Interest on Loan 800
Depreciation:
- Freehold Premises 7,600
- Plant and Machinery 13,800
- Motor Cars 6,000
- Office Equipment 1,600
Total Expenses (195,800)
Net Profit Before Appropriation £287,200

Appropriation Account

The appropriation account shows how the net profit is distributed among partners.

Category Amount (£)
Net Profit 287,200
Less: Appropriations
Interest on Capitals:
- Bell (10%) 12,111
- Booker (10%) 7,322
- Candell (10%) 1,567
Total Interest on Capitals (21,000)
Partner’s Salaries:
- Booker 16,000
Total Salary Expense (16,000)
Remaining Profit to be Shared 250,200
Bell (2/5) 100,080
Booker (2/5) 100,080
Candell (1/5) 50,040
Total Appropriation (250,200)

Partners’ Capital Accounts

Partner Opening Balance (£) Goodwill Adjustment (£) Revaluation Profit (£) Capital Introduced (£) Drawings (£) Closing Balance (£)
Bell 100,000 (20,000) 47,333 - (30,000) 97,333
Booker 60,000 (10,000) 23,667 - (40,000) 33,667
Candell - 12,000 - 50,000 (4,000) 58,000
Total 160,000 (18,000) 71,000 50,000 (74,000) 189,000

Adjustments:

  • Goodwill was valued at £60,000 but was not recorded in the books, resulting in adjustments.
  • The revaluation of assets resulted in a profit split among Bell and Booker as per their old ratio (2/3 and 1/3).
  • Candell introduced a private car valued at £7,000 and capital of £50,000.
  • Bell transferred £20,000 from capital to a loan account.

Partners’ Current Accounts

Partner Opening Balance (£) Interest on Capital (£) Salary (£) Profit Share (£) Drawings (£) Closing Balance (£)
Bell 16,000 12,111 - 100,080 (30,000) 98,191
Booker 12,000 7,322 16,000 100,080 (40,000) 95,402
Candell - 1,567 - 50,040 (4,000) 47,607
Total 28,000 21,000 16,000 250,200 (74,000) 241,200

Adjustments:

  • Interest on capital was credited to each partner.
  • Booker received a salary of £16,000.
  • The remaining net profit was distributed in the agreed ratios.

Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet) as of 31 December 20X2

Assets

Category Cost (£) Accumulated Depreciation (£) Net Book Value (£)
Freehold Premises 210,000 (7,600) 202,400
Plant and Machinery 27,000 (13,800) 13,200
Motor Cars 12,000 (6,000) 6,000
Office Equipment 6,000 (1,600) 4,400
Total Non-Current Assets 255,000 (29,000) 226,000

Current Assets

Category Amount (£)
Inventory 8,000
Trade Receivables 14,000
Bank 19,200
Total Current Assets 41,200

Capital and Liabilities

Category Amount (£)
Partners' Capital Accounts 189,000
Partners' Current Accounts 241,200
Loan from Bell 20,000
Trade Payables 17,000
Total Capital and Liabilities 467,200

Purpose of Preparing Financial Statements (Merit - 1M1)

Financial statements are a fundamental tool used to understand the financial health and performance of a business, including profitability, liquidity, and overall financial stability (Olayinka, 2022). These statements help in maintaining financial discipline by providing the sole traders and partnerships with some structured summary of all financial transactions within a certain period. A business owner can use the income statement to find out how much profit the company is making by evaluating the revenue, the expenses and the net profit from the resulting statement (Rusydi, 2021). The statement of financial position (balance sheet) shows the financial standing of the business by indicating all the assets, liabilities and capital and ensures that the owners and stakeholders can get an idea about the financial situation at a particular time.

Financial statements have an important role in equity sharing and accountability for partnerships (Gardi et al., 2021). In this last, the appropriation account is transparent on how net profit is divided among the shareholders according to preset ratios, salaries and interest on capital. This guarantees fair contributions & withdrawals and stops any disputes about that. Personal investments, withdrawals and profit allocation are kept track of the partners' capital and current accounts in order to see each partner's financial stake in the business (Hawk, 2024). Accurate financial reporting also supports tax compliance due to the fact that, as a business, it needs to follow legal requirements and avoid penalties without raising more questions to the tax authorities.

Financial statements are a very important aspect that is used for decision-making in the organization, financial planning and future growth strategies (Dwivedi et al., 2020). They also enable businesses to know trends, manage cash flow effectively and determine whether a business would want to raise more outside capital. Financial reports are one of the things sole traders and partnerships use to check whether the venture is viable and profitable enough to keep running or whether some gear changes are needed (Andries, Clarysse and Costa, 2021). Financial statements function as a communication tool between the business and external entities like investors, banks, or regulatory bodies, ensuring that all financial transactions are properly recorded and follow standard accounting principles.

The usefulness of Financial Statements to Stakeholders (Distinction - 1D1)

Financial statements have many stakeholders, each using the reports for different reasons. Business owners and managers understand financial statements to measure profitability, track performance, and make data-based decisions on investment, expansion and cost control (Lassoued and Khanchel, 2021). They can study the trends in revenue, expenses and net profit of a business. Then they can know its strengths and weaknesses to implement the strategies for the business’ long-term sustainability.

Financial statements are relied upon by partners to ensure fair profit distribution, assess capital investments, and monitor contributions of an economic nature. The appropriation account allows for transparent profit sharing, the partners’ capital and current accounts to record financial transactions and avert disputes (Morales et al., 2022). Financial records are essential for running a business to maintain trust and accountability with business partners.

Investors and other potential investors analyse financial statements to see that a business is financially stable and can generate returns. Investors decide to allocate their capital (money) and go for adding more capital to the business only if it is profitable and also can maintain the operations. Financial statements are only used by lenders, like banks and financial institutions, to determine the business’s creditworthiness (Makhazhanova et al., 2022). On the balance sheet view, they try to assess the liquidity and solvency of the company so that the industry can pay for its loans and so forth.

Before providing credit terms, suppliers and creditors rely on financial statements to assess a business’s financial health. This element also helps the suppliers trust the ability of a company to meet its short-term liabilities as per the statement of financial position and thus reassures them about timely payments. Government agencies and tax authorities use financial statements to verify compliance with tax regulations and financial reporting standards (Edy et al., 2021). Accurate financial records help all businesses fulfil their tax obligations and lessen the chances of something going wrong when dealing with their taxes.

Employees and trade unions examine financial statements to assess job security, salary potential, and future growth opportunities (Nilsson and Nilsson, 2021). A profitable and financially stable business often provides job security, career advancement opportunities, salary increments, and more. In unprofitable companies, employees can be worried about job cuts or reduced salaries.

Customers and clients engaging in long-term contracts and high-value transactions may be interested in financial statements. A financially strong business establishes confidence in customers that it will be able to stay in business without risk to itself or its service delivery. Businesses can oblige existing and potential corporate clients and government customers who would like to enter any form of contract with them to be financially able to execute agreements (Olayinka, 2022). All stakeholders need to see what the financial statements are about because these are reliable economic data, it will help to assist when making decisions and investors will at least have some trust in the business. Financial reports give businesses analytical insights into profitability, solvency, and long-term viability, assuring credibility, attracting investments, and sustaining operations in a competitive marketplace.

Task 2

2.2 Prepare a statement of cash flows for a specific limited company.

  1. Income Statement for the Year Ended March 31, 2024
Particulars Amount (₹ Crore)
Revenue 2,90,800
Cost of Sales (1,98,000)
Gross Profit 92,800
Operating Expenses
- Selling Expenses (20,000)
- Administrative Expenses (10,000)
Total Operating Expenses (30,000)
Operating Profit 62,800
Other Income 5,000
Finance Costs (2,000)
Profit Before Tax 65,800
Tax Expense (16,450)
Net Profit for the Year 49,350
  • Gross Profit Calculation:
  • Operating Expenses:
    • Selling Expenses: ₹20,000 Crore
    • Administrative Expenses: ₹10,000 Crore
    • Total Operating Expenses: ₹30,000 Crore
  • Finance Costs:
    • Interest paid on loans: ₹2,000 Crore
  • Tax Expense Calculation:
  1. Statement of Financial Position as at March 31, 2024
Particulars Amount (₹ Crore)
ASSETS
Non-Current Assets
- Property and Equipment 1,12,240
- Right-of-Use Assets 78,860
- Intangible Assets and Goodwill 44,990
Total Non-Current Assets 2,36,090
Current Assets
- Accounts Receivable 4,45,610
- Unbilled Revenues 1,53,000
- Invested Funds 4,69,630
- Other Current Assets 90,950
Total Current Assets 11,59,190
Total Assets 13,95,280
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
- Share Capital 3,75,000
- Retained Earnings 6,00,000
- Other Reserves 1,20,000
Total Equity 10,95,000
Non-Current Liabilities
- Long-Term Borrowings 50,000
- Lease Liabilities 70,000
Total Non-Current Liabilities 1,20,000
Current Liabilities
- Trade Payables 80,000
- Short-Term Provisions 71
- Other Current Liabilities 1,00,209
Total Current Liabilities 1,80,280
Total Equity and Liabilities 13,95,280

Workings for Statement of Financial Position:

  • Non-Current Assets Calculation:

Property & Equipment + Right-of-Use Assets + Intangible Assets = 1,12,240 + 78,860 + 44,990 = ₹2,36,090 Crore

  • Total Current Assets:

Accounts Receivable + Unbilled Revenues + Invested Funds + Other Current Assets = 4,45,610 + 1,53,000 + 4,69,630 + 90,950 = ₹11,59,190 Crore

  • Total Liabilities Calculation:

Non-Current Liabilities + Current Liabilities = 1,20,000 + 1,80,280 = ₹3,00,280 Crore

  1. Statement of Changes in Equity for the Year Ended March 31, 2024
Particulars Share Capital (₹ Crore) Retained Earnings (₹ Crore) Other Reserves (₹ Crore) Total Equity (₹ Crore)
Balance as at April 1, 2023 3,75,000 5,50,650 1,10,000 10,35,650
Net Profit for the Year 49,350 49,350
Other Comprehensive Income 10,000 10,000
Dividends Paid (20,000) (20,000)
Balance as at March 31, 2024 3,75,000 6,00,000 1,20,000 10,95,000
  • Retained Earnings Calculation:

Previous Balance + Net Profit - Dividends Paid = 5,50,650 + 49,350 - 20,000 = ₹6,00,000 Crore

  • Total Equity Calculation:

Share Capital + Retained Earnings + Other Reserves = 3,75,000 + 6,00,000 + 1,20,000 = ₹10,95,000 Crore

Notes to Financial Statements

  1. Basis of Preparation

These are our financial statements for Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Limited, prepared in line with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and are in compliance with the regulatory standards as per the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI.) (Bhasin, 2017) The financial statements included in this booklet represent an accurate and fair view of the company's financial performance, position and cash flow about the financial year ending March 31, 2024.

  1. Revenue Recognition

Revenue from contracts with the customer is recognized by reference to the expected consideration at the time at which control of the goods or services is transferred to the customer. The company follows the long-term contracts carried out using the percentage of completion method and short-term service contracts using the point-in-time recognition method (Sari, Anugrah and Nasir, 2020).

  1. Property, Plant, and Equipment (PPE)

Historical costs, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, are used to record property, plant and equipment (Karapavlovic, Obradovic and Bogicevic, 2020). The straight-line method is used to calculate the depreciation on each asset and is time-based based on the useful life of each asset. Accordingly, the estimated useful life of the different asset classes is as follows:

Buildings: 30 years

Plant & Machinery: 10 years

Office Equipment: 5 years

Vehicles: 4 years

  1. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Business acquisitions give rise to goodwill, which is tested yearly for impairment (Hartmann, 2021). Software and patents are other intangible assets, some of which are amortized throughout their reasonably expected helpful life and cover 3 – 7 years.

  1. Depreciation and Amortization Policy

Amortization and depreciation charges are calculated using asset patterns of usage and the expected residual value of ownership (Nechaev, 2020). Annual review of assets for possible indication of impairment and impairment loss recognised in the income statement if the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the recoverable value.

  1. Financial Instruments

The company classifies financial instruments into financial assets, liabilities, and equity instruments by IFRS 9. The key financial assets are trade receivables, cash equivalents, and investments of equity instruments. Financial liabilities include borrowings, lease liabilities, and trade payables (Magli, Nobolo and Ogliari, 2018).

  1. Provision for Doubtful Debts and Trade Receivables

The trade receivables are reported at amortized cost based on the effective interest rate. [Given] Expected credit loss (ECL) models are provided for the records of doubtful debts based on the allocation of books by the risk of turning outstanding receivables (Schutte et al., 2020). The receivables exceeding 180 days are provided with a provision rate of 5% for the year.

  1. Income Taxes

For income tax accounting purposes, the company has a liability method. Temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their tax bases generate deferred tax liabilities (Schutte et al., 2020). For the year, a 25% rate of corporate tax is applied.

  1. Lease Accounting

Under IFRS 16 – Leases, the company recognises lease liabilities, which generate rights of use and corresponding liabilities to the balance sheet (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2019). According to the rules of lease payments, interest expense is recognized in the income statement, while principal repayment is booked as an expense.

  1. Dividend Policy

In FY 2024, TCS declared a final dividend of ₹20,000 crore for its shareholders. The dividend payout stays in sync with the company’s objective of maintaining a balance between a stable dividend payout to the investors and enough capital for business expansion (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2019).

Director’s Report for the Financial Year Ended March 31, 2024

To the Shareholders,

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Limited, the Board of Directors, have the pleasure of presenting the Annual Report of the year ended March 31, 2024 (TCS, 2023). With global economic challenges, the company has achieved strong financial growth, recording total revenue of ₹2,90,800 crore and a net profit of ₹49,350 crore (an increase of 8.2% yearly). Using an increasingly technological landscape, TCS has demonstrated robust operational efficiency and resilience (TCS, 2023).

TCS has continued to expand globally during the year, delivering digital transformation solutions to banking, financial services, retail, healthcare, and telecommunications sectors. These included deploying AI-powered analytics solutions to improve business process efficiency, establishing the TCS Quantum Computing Research Lab to drive quantum computing applications, and enhancing cloud computing services with Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud (Jordan, 2024). The company also made strategic acquisitions in Europe and North America to expand its consulting capabilities.

Besides adding 58 new $100 million revenue clients, TCS built on its enterprise engagement model. The client acquisition remained high, with 98% of business being from existing clients (Jordan, 2024). The company invested ₹5,000 crore in AI, machine learning, blockchain and cybersecurity innovations despite that. Led by its successful TCS Innovation Lab network (the network that identifies opportunities related to new-generation digital solutions and helps these ideas become commercially viable markets), TCS filed 15 new patents in the last 12 months, maintaining its leadership in next-generation digital solutions (Bhattacharya, 2022).

The focus on talent development continued, and the company hired 45,000 new employees globally and maintained an employee satisfaction rating of 91 per cent in internal surveys (Bhattacharya, 2022). It has also invested significantly in AI and cybersecurity training and reskilling programs, so TCS is at the front rank in workforce development and digital expertise.

TCS remained at the forefront of retaining sustainability in its long-term strategy. Over the past three years, the company has reduced carbon emissions by 30%, invested in education programs impacting more than 500,000 students worldwide, and eliminated fossil fuel use in key data centres (Hayat, Islam and Hossain, 2024).

The company has a detailed risk management framework to deal with specific risks, such as cybersecurity threats, regulatory compliance, currency fluctuations, and geopolitical uncertainties. The Board has firmly adhered to the SEBI regulations, IFRS accounting standards, and money laundering policies. The Board has proposed this in the form of a final dividend of ₹20,000 crore, which is at par with the past returns, as well as maintaining a strong capital structure for future investments (Hayat, Islam and Hossain, 2024).

2.2 Prepare a statement of cash flows for a specific limited company

Income Statement for the Year Ended March 31, 2024

Particulars

Amount (₹ Crore)

Revenue

10,00,122

Cost of Sales

(7,50,000)

Gross Profit

2,50,122

Operating Expenses

- Selling and Distribution Expenses

(30,000)

- Administrative Expenses

(20,000)

Total Operating Expenses

(50,000)

Operating Profit

2,00,122

Other Income

5,000

Finance Costs

(10,000)

Profit Before Tax

1,95,122

Tax Expense

(50,000)

Net Profit for the Year

1,45,122

Workings

Particulars

Amount (₹ Crore)

Workings

Revenue

10,00,122

Given Data

Cost of Sales

(7,50,000)

Given Data

Gross Profit

2,50,122

Revenue - Cost of Sales = 10,00,122 - 7,50,000

Operating Expenses

- Selling Expenses

(30,000)

Given Data

- Administrative Expenses

(20,000)

Given Data

Total Operating Expenses

(50,000)

30,000 + 20,000

Operating Profit

2,00,122

Gross Profit - Total Operating Expenses = 2,50,122 - 50,000

Other Income

5,000

Given Data

Finance Costs

(10,000)

Given Data

Profit Before Tax

1,95,122

Operating Profit + Other Income - Finance Costs = 2,00,122 + 5,000 - 10,000

Tax Expense

(50,000)

Profit Before Tax × 25% = 1,95,122 × 25%

Net Profit for the Year

1,45,122

Profit Before Tax - Tax Expense = 1,95,122 - 50,000

Statement of Financial Position as at March 31, 2024

Particulars

Amount (₹ Crore)

ASSETS

Non-Current Assets

- Property, Plant, and Equipment

5,00,000

- Intangible Assets

1,00,000

- Investments

2,00,000

Total Non-Current Assets

8,00,000

Current Assets

- Inventories

1,50,000

- Trade Receivables

1,00,000

- Cash and Cash Equivalents

50,000

Total Current Assets

3,00,000

Total Assets

11,00,000

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Equity

- Share Capital

2,00,000

- Retained Earnings

4,00,000

- Other Reserves

1,00,000

Total Equity

7,00,000

Non-Current Liabilities

- Long-Term Borrowings

2,00,000

- Deferred Tax Liabilities

50,000

Total Non-Current Liabilities

2,50,000

Current Liabilities

- Trade Payables

1,00,000

- Short-Term Provisions

25,000

- Other Current Liabilities

25,000

Total Current Liabilities

1,50,000

Total Equity and Liabilities

11,00,000

Statement of Changes in Equity for the Year Ended March 31, 2024

Particulars

Share Capital (₹ Crore)

Retained Earnings (₹ Crore)

Other Reserves (₹ Crore)

Total Equity (₹ Crore)

Balance as at April 1, 2023

2,00,000

2,54,878

90,000

5,44,878

Net Profit for the Year

1,45,122

1,45,122

Other Comprehensive Income

10,000

10,000

Dividends Paid

(20,000)

(20,000)

Balance as at March 31, 2024

2,00,000

3,80,000

1,00,000

6,80,000

Workings

Particulars

Amount (₹ Crore)

Workings

ASSETS

Non-Current Assets

- Property, Plant, and Equipment

5,00,000

Given Data

- Intangible Assets

1,00,000

Given Data

- Investments

2,00,000

Given Data

Total Non-Current Assets

8,00,000

Property, Plant & Equipment + Intangible Assets + Investments = 5,00,000 + 1,00,000 + 2,00,000

Current Assets

- Inventories

1,50,000

Given Data

- Trade Receivables

1,00,000

Given Data

- Cash and Cash Equivalents

50,000

Given Data

- Other Current Assets

20,000

Given Data

Total Current Assets

3,20,000

Inventories + Trade Receivables + Cash Equivalents + Other Current Assets = 1,50,000 + 1,00,000 + 50,000 + 20,000

Total Assets

11,20,000

Total Non-Current Assets + Total Current Assets = 8,00,000 + 3,20,000

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Equity

- Share Capital

3,75,000

Given Data

- Retained Earnings

4,00,000

Given Data

- Other Reserves

1,00,000

Given Data

Total Equity

8,75,000

Share Capital + Retained Earnings + Other Reserves = 3,75,000 + 4,00,000 + 1,00,000

Non-Current Liabilities

- Long-Term Borrowings

1,00,000

Given Data

- Deferred Tax Liabilities

20,000

Given Data

Total Non-Current Liabilities

1,20,000

Long-Term Borrowings + Deferred Tax Liabilities = 1,00,000 + 20,000

Current Liabilities

- Trade Payables

50,000

Given Data

- Short-Term Provisions

25,000

Given Data

- Other Current Liabilities

50,000

Given Data

Total Current Liabilities

1,25,000

Trade Payables + Short-Term Provisions + Other Current Liabilities = 50,000 + 25,000 + 50,000

Total Equity and Liabilities

11,20,000

Total Equity + Total Liabilities = 8,75,000 + 1,20,000 + 1,25,000

2M1 Evaluate the need to identify and correct omissions and errors before preparing company financial Statements.

Introduction

Preparing financial statements is an essential process for which precision, adherence to accounting standards and transparency are critical. Some financial records errors and omissions will cause misrepresentation of financial health figures, make wrong decisions and later lead to legal abuses (Russo, 2022). Errors in these rates happen, and if not corrected before finalizing financial statements, such reports show a disturbingly 'untrue and unfair' picture of a company's performance and position.

There are various reasons for errors in financial statements, including errors when recording transactions, errors in the classification of accounts, and errors in applying accounting principles (Russo, 2022). These errors can distort a company’s financial reports as well as the company’s credibility if not caught and fixed.

Types of Errors in Financial Statements

Some errors affect the trial balance and errors that do not affect the trial balance.

  1. Errors Affecting the Trial Balance

These errors result in an imbalance in the trial balance,, thereby showing an error. They include:

  • Arithmetical Errors – Occur due to mistakes in addition, subtraction, or transposition of figures.

However, these errors might occur: Ledger Posting Errors, where an amount is wrongly recorded in the ledger accounts (Choudhary, Merkley and Schipper, 2021).

Errors in Double Entry – Errors related to ‘Recording only one side of a transaction’ (either debit or credit).

  1. Errors Not Affecting the Trial Balance

Though the errors do not produce a trial balance discrepancy, they mislead financial users. They include:

Stipulation of the Error of Omission stipulates that when a transaction is omitted from the books, the omission will be regarded as an error (Al Najjar, Ghanem and Higazi, 2024).

When an entry is recorded in the wrong account but still within the same class.

Errors of Judgment – Errors would have occurred, but the accounting system produced the illusion of proper records.

Case of compensating errors (i.e.) Two or more errors cancel each other out so that the trial balance looks correct although mistakes exist (Al Najjar, Ghanem and Higazi, 2024).

Errors of Reversal – In the case of a mistake, if a debit entry is wrongly recorded as a credit, and a credit entry is improperly recorded as a debit.

Examples of Errors and Omissions

Error of Omission

Suppose a company receives an invoice from a supplier for ₹50,000, which is not recorded in the books. This omission means that expenses and liabilities are understated. The correction involves recording the missing transaction as follows:

Account

Debit (₹)

Credit (₹)

Purchases

50,000

-

Trade Payables

-

50,000


Error of Commission

If telephone expenses of ₹10,000 are wrongly debited to the advertising expense account, the total costs may still be correct, but the classification is wrong. The correction requires adjusting the accounts as follows:

Account

Debit (₹)

Credit (₹)

Telephone Expense

10,000

-

Advertising Expense

-

10,000


Error of Principle

A repair expense of ₹15,000 is mistakenly recorded as an increase in machinery value instead of a revenue expense. This overstates fixed assets and understates expenses. The correction involves:

Account

Debit (₹)

Credit (₹)

Repairs Expense

15,000

-

Machinery Account

-

15,000


Compensating Errors

If an equal overstatement of purchases offsets an error in overstating sales revenue by ₹25,000, the trial balance remains balanced, but the gross profit figure is incorrect. Adjustments are needed in both accounts to correct the mistake.

Impact of Errors on Financial Statements

Grave consequences of the presence of uncorrected errors in the financial statements can include:

Misrepresentation of Financial Position

If errors are made with profits, liabilities and assets, the company’s financial health will be affected and can be overstated or understated (Hung, Van and Archer, 2023).

Tax and Legal Implications

If the company is misreporting revenue or expenses, it under or over-pays its taxes and can be penalized by the tax authorities.

Investor and Stakeholder Misinformation

Investors and shareholders use accurate financial data in making investment decisions. Misleading financial ratios can occur due to errors and greatly tarnish financial statements' credibility (Hung, Van and Archer, 2023).

Incorrect Managerial Decisions

Management uses financial data for budgeting, forecasting, and strategic planning. Misallocation of resources and poor business decisions are often a result of errors in financial statements.

Methods for Detecting and Correcting Errors Before Finalizing Financial Statements

Financial professionals rely on several techniques to detect and correct errors to guarantee accuracy (Zlati, Antohi and Cardon, 2019).

Checking whether total debits and credits match is called a Trial Balance Review.

Comparing actual financial figures against budgeted or prior year amounts as Variance Analysis.

Match invoices, receipts, and contracts to accounting entries called Document Reconciliation.

Internal and External Audits – Reviews are done to discover misstatements or discrepancies.

In case of errors that cannot be corrected immediately, the incorrect amount is temporarily held in a suspense account until corrected (Zlati, Antohi and Cardon, 2019).

Using a Suspense Account for Error Correction

  1. If a sales entry of ₹20,000 is mistakenly debited to the purchases account, it can be temporarily recorded in a suspense account until the issue is investigated:

Account

Debit (₹)

Credit (₹)

Suspense Account

20,000

-

Purchases

-

20,000

  1. Once the error is identified, the correct entry can be made:

Account

Debit (₹)

Credit (₹)

Sales Revenue

20,000

-

Suspense Account

-

20,000

Financial accuracy, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder confidence require detecting omissions and errors before finalizing financial statements. Errors against the business can cause misstatements, tax penalties, and wrong financial decisions (Azzali and Mazza, 2020). Companies should adopt internal controls with a suitable control environment, review process, and audit oversight to effectively prevent and correct financial misstatements.

Application and explanation of relevant accounting concepts

Accounting concepts help prepare financial statements in a way that ensures consistency, transparency and accuracy. Financial statements reflect a company's actual and proper financial position, which is ensured by these principles that govern the recording and reporting of financial transactions (Schoenmaker and Schramade, 2023). These concepts need to be applied to IFRS and GAAP financial regulations. Financial statements would not be consistent without these principles as it would be difficult for stakeholders to interpret it and compare the performance of businesses (Lev, 2018).

Accrual Concept

According to the accrual concept, financial transactions should be recorded when they are made, not when cash is received or paid (Lev, 2018). This will ensure that the revenues and expenses will go against the proper accounting period, making the financial performance more accurate. Suppose a company gives services worth ₹50,000 in March but takes the payment in April, then the revenue will be booked in March as it was served in that month. Also, in a business, if a company has paid electricity bill expenses in December but has to pay cash in January, the cost is recorded in December (Burke, 2019). This concept is significant in ascertaining a firm's profitability level and determining whether a firm's financial statements present the business's economic aspect. It provides an idea of the true financial performance of the organization without the distortion that the timing of cash transactions makes to the traditional performance indicators (Burke, 2019).

Going Concern Concept

The going concern condition assumes that the business will continue to operate in the future unless contrary evidence exists. Under this assumption, financial statements reflect a long-term view of the financial position of the company and the valuation of assets and liabilities is also affected (Górowski, Kurek and Szarucki, 2022). If a company were not deemed a going concern, assets would have to be valued at liquidation price rather than historical cost or fair value on a sound basis. This means businesses wouldn’t need to artificially drop asset values or anticipate expenses earlier to deceive investors and stakeholders. When a company is experiencing financial distress or bankruptcy, financial statements must report this information and assets may have to be reported at their realisable value (Zhao, Ouenniche and De Smedt, 2024).

Matching Concept

The matching concept requires that the expenses are booked in the same accounting period as the corresponding revenues. It is to ensure that the reported net income is an actual performance of the business for that particular period (Zhao, Ouenniche and De Smedt, 2024). If the advertising expenses in January are realized through sales in March, then such an expense should have been booked in March instead of January. The principle prevents making a profit overstated or understated, which would lead to the financial statement not reflecting the company's operational efficiency level (Bhimavarapu et al., 2023).

Consistency Concept

The consistency concept states that companies should always apply the same accounting methods and principles to ensure the comparability of financial statements. A change in the depreciation method from a straight line to a reduced balance requires a company to disclose and justify it (Bhimavarapu et al., 2023). This provides consistency to investors, creditors, and analysts regarding how a company performs on an ongoing basis and does not suffer from distortions introduced by frequent changes in accounting policies. Without this principle, financial statements could not be relied upon (Lukason and Camacho-Miñano, 2019). Thus, one could not assess trends or even make a meaningful comparison with other companies in the same industry due to an inability to assume that the values reported were relevant to all.

Prudence Concept

The prudence concept stipulates that accountants should be cautious in recording of revenues and expenses. Simply put, this will simultaneously recognise expected costs and liabilities but only recognise the revenues when realized (Lukason and Camacho-Miñano, 2019). This principle prevents companies from overstating their profits and assets, which could be a misrepresentation to investors. For instance, if a company believes that a client will default on a payment, it should create a provision for doubtful debts rather than letting the default occur (Magli, Nobolo and Ogliari, 2018). Inventory is to be recorded at a lower amount than the cost or the net realizable value.

Materiality Concept

This concept indicates that the financial statements will contain every transaction that may affect the decisions of the stakeholders. The accountants can focus on the material transactions and the insignificant items not considered in the financial analysis (Hussinki et al., 2024). For example, a company does not need to report any minor stationery expenses separately if such fees are not significant in comparison to the operational costs of the company (Hussinki et al., 2024). Moreover, they must report detailed financial items such as capital expenditures, loans, and substantial investments.

Entity Concept

The entity concept requires that a business be considered distinctly from its owners for accounting purposes. That’s why the owner's personal assets and liabilities should not be mingled with the business's financial transactions. A business owner’s use of cash should be recorded as drawings instead of an expense incurred by the business (Carnegie et al., 2022). This principle ensures that the business's financial report will contain only the economic activities of the business itself and will help to have correct information about profitability and the business’s financial health (Thi, Nguyen and Nguyen, 2023). In particular, it is essential because if businesses are looking for loans or investments, it gives the confidence that private matters will not touch the business's finances.

Realization Concept

The realization concept provides that revenue should be recognized only when received, with reasonable certainty of receipt (Napier and Stadler, 2020). It prevents companies from hasty realization of revenue that can inflate their financial performance. If a company gets advance payments for services supplied in the next financial year, the amount should be booked as a liability (unearned revenue). Financial statements would reflect the genuine revenue generation in this way, and none will be allowed to exhibit false income statements (Świecka, Terefenko and Paprotny, 2021). It is essential in businesses where payments are made on a credit basis that the realization principle is that the revenues shown in financial statements are actual earnings and not expectations of future costs.

Dual Aspect Concept

The dual aspect concept is the basis of the double-entry accounting system. It is the foundation for each financial transaction, with two equal and opposite impacts on accounting records (Świecka, Terefenko and Paprotny, 2021). Thus, every debit entry has a corresponding credit, while the reverse is untrue. For example, a company buys machinery worth Rs.5,00,000 on credit. Furthermore, the accounting records will show a rise in the liability account (trade payables account) and an increase in the machinery assets account. This principle helps you ensure that the principle of the accounting equation is kept in place, errors are avoided, and financial reporting is transparent (Barker et al., 2021).

Task 3

3.1 Evaluate the accounting records of a specific organisation.

Income Statement for the Year Ended 31 December 2024

Particulars

Amount (₹ Crore)

Revenue

1,58,381

Cost of Sales

(85,200)

Gross Profit

73,181

Operating Expenses

(16,500)

Operating Profit

56,681

Other Income

3,800

Finance Costs

(2,500)

Profit Before Tax

57,981

Tax Expense

(15,200)

Net Profit for the Year

42,781

Statement of Changes in Equity for the Year Ended 31 December 2024

Particulars

Share Capital (₹ Crore)

Retained Earnings (₹ Crore)

Other Reserves (₹ Crore)

Total Equity (₹ Crore)

Balance as at 1 January 2024

25,000

45,000

9,000

79,000

Net Profit for the Year

-

42,781

-

42,781

Other Comprehensive Income

-

-

1,000

1,000

Dividends Paid

-

(10,000)

-

(10,000)

Balance as at 31 December 2024

25,000

77,781

10,000

1,12,781

Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2024

Particulars

Amount (₹ Crore)

ASSETS

Non-Current Assets

63,000

Current Assets

36,900

Total Assets

99,900

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Equity

85,000

Non-Current Liabilities

9,500

Current Liabilities

11,400

Total Equity and Liabilities

99,900

Ratio

Formula

Purpose

(i) Current Ratio

Current Ratio = Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities

Measures the company's ability to meet short-term obligations using its current assets.

(ii) Acid Test Ratio (Quick Ratio)

Acid Test Ratio = (Current Assets - Inventory) ÷ Current Liabilities

Assesses short-term liquidity excluding inventory, as inventory may not be quickly converted into cash.

(iii) Trade Receivables Turnover in Days (Trade Receivables Collection Period)

Trade Receivables Turnover in Days = (Trade Receivables ÷ Revenue) × 365

Indicates the average number of days a company takes to collect payments from customers.

(iv) Trade Payables Turnover in Days

Trade Payables Turnover in Days = (Trade Payables ÷ Cost of Sales) × 365

Represents the average number of days a company takes to pay its suppliers.

Ratio

Formula

2024 Calculation

2024 Value

2023 Calculation

2023 Value

Current Ratio

Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities

₹36,900 ÷ ₹11,400

3.24

₹35,000 ÷ ₹11,000

3.18

Acid Test Ratio

(Current Assets - Inventory) ÷ Current Liabilities

(₹36,900 - ₹5,200) ÷ ₹11,400

2.78

(₹35,000 - ₹5,000) ÷ ₹11,000

2.73

Trade Receivables Turnover in Days

(Trade Receivables ÷ Revenue) × 365

(₹19,500 ÷ ₹1,58,381) × 365

44.94 Days

(₹19,000 ÷ ₹1,50,000) × 365

46.23 Days

Trade Payables Turnover in Days

(Trade Payables ÷ Cost of Sales) × 365

(₹3,800 ÷ ₹85,200) × 365

16.28 Days

(₹3,600 ÷ ₹80,000) × 365

16.43 Days

Return on Assets (%)

(Net Profit ÷ Total Assets) × 100

(₹42,781 ÷ ₹99,900) × 100

42.82%

(₹40,000 ÷ ₹95,000) × 100

42.11%

Return on Equity (%)

(Net Profit ÷ Total Equity) × 100

(₹42,781 ÷ ₹1,12,781) × 100

37.93%

(₹40,000 ÷ ₹1,07,500) × 100

37.21%

Operating Profit Margin (%)

(Operating Profit ÷ Revenue) × 100

(₹56,681 ÷ ₹1,58,381) × 100

35.81%

(₹54,000 ÷ ₹1,50,000) × 100

36.00%

Asset Turnover Ratio

Revenue ÷ Total Assets

₹1,58,381 ÷ ₹99,900

1.59

₹1,50,000 ÷ ₹95,000

1.58

Debt Ratio

Total Liabilities ÷ Total Assets

₹(9,500 + 11,400) ÷ ₹99,900

0.21

₹(9,000 + 11,000) ÷ ₹95,000

0.21

Equity Ratio

Total Equity ÷ Total Assets

₹1,12,781 ÷ ₹99,900

1.13

₹1,07,500 ÷ ₹95,000

1.13

Current Ratio

Unit 1 Financial Reporting Assignment Sample
Liked This Sample? Hire Me Now
John Taylor
John Taylor 4.5 reviews 7 Years | MBA

Though Infosys does have some strong liquidity, as it is still capable of meeting its short-term obligations, its current ratio has slightly increased from 3.18 in 2023 to 3.24 in 2024. Most commonly, a ratio above 1.5 is healthy, and Infosys's ratio shows that it has an ample amount of current assets as a buffer to liabilities. This increase in cash represents working capital held, with sales higher reflecting the fact the company is good at managing it. However, an excessively high ratio may imply that the company’s assets are not effectively utilized for growth possibilities (Ngoc, Nguyen and Pham, 2023).

Acid Test Ratio (Quick Ratio)

Even after stripping inventory, Infosys’s acid test ratio improved slightly, from 2.73 in 2023 to 2.78 in 2024, which means it has good short-term liquidity. In other words, Infosys has enough cash, receivables or other liquid assets able to pay its short term liabilities. This suggests little reliance on inventory sales for liquidity which is common for a tech company that has limited inventory. The upward indication shows that Infosys could keep a liquid position as operations grew efficiently (Infosys.com, 2021).

Trade Receivables Turnover in Days

From 2023 to 2024, the trade receivables turnover in days became 4.94 days better, indicating that Infosys collects payments from customers faster. In this context, improved collection efficiency suggests better credit policies and customer payment cycles, thereby decreasing bad debt risk. This allows Infosys to reinvest in operations more effectively; therefore, a shorter collection period will help improve Infosys’s cash flow. However, if collection times keep falling far too much, it may reveal that the company is issuing ever more severe credit terms, which could jeopardize relationships with clients (Beck, 2023).

Trade Payables Turnover in Days

While the trade payables turnover saw no change from last year, at a stable 16.28 days in 2024 and 16.43 days in 2023, Infosys stays firm on its supplier payment cycle. This indicates that payment terms for this company have not been extended or shortened, indicating financial stability. Keeping Infosys’s suppliers happy pays by ensuring the firm is paid on time while allowing the firm to negotiate better deals (Chavan, Gowan and Vogeley, 2022). An increase in payable days implies a delay in payments, and a decrease implies that the company is receiving short-term liquidity advantages instead of paying it quickly.

Return on Assets (ROA)

The per cent return on assets was uplifted in 2024 over the previous year, rising to 42.82%, which reflects that Infosys is doing better on using its assets to create profits. The company is earning a lot of profit because of its size and the utilization of its total assets (Prasetya Margono and Gantino, 2021). High ROA implies strong operational efficiency and effective utilization of assets. If this ROA is rising, Infosys is make more profit on every unit of its asset investment, which implies that investments in infrastructure, technology and human capital are providing better returns.

Return on Equity (ROE)

As a result of the improved percentage of the net income versus shareholders’ equity, the return on equity increased from 37.21% in 2023 to 37.93% in 2024. The positive ROE indicates that Infosys is earning more profit for the investors, rendering it attractive. This suggests steady increases are making for adequate profit reinvestment and possible operational improvements. A high ROE is good, but if the ROE gets too high, then this may indicate extreme amounts of leverage (Akhtar et al., 2021). Infosy's low debt level supports that growth is because of operational efficiency and not financial risk.

Operating Profit Margin

Running this metric (i.e., operating profit margin) represents 36.00% in 2023 and 35.81% in 2024. Infosys’s operating costs (expenses) have increased more than its revenue. It may be for a slight dip, which could be because of higher operational expenses, increased labour costs, or more investment in research and development. The margin is substantial, though a decline may signal higher costs than revenue expansion (Weber and Wasner, 2023). The focus for Infosys should be to optimize the expenses best and keep the pricing competitive to ensure the sustainability of the profit margin.

Asset Turnover Ratio

In 2024, Infosys had an asset turnover ratio pegged to 1.59 (1.58 in 2023), implying that Infosys is still capable of doing business efficiently by generating revenues (due to low ratios of total assets to revenue). A stable asset turnover ratio signifies that the company is not expending more for using its assets or underutilizing its assets (Giany Febriyanti, Simon and Dinda Oktavia, 2024). Asset turnover is substantial at 1.2, indicating that Infosys has an optimal investment in assets vis-a-vis revenue generation. If monitored, this ratio should be noted to ensure that the company maximizes efficiency in the manner that the asset is utilized.

Debt Ratio

The amount of debt financed by Infosys also remained unchanged both in 2023 and in 2024 at 0.21, indicating a prudent approach from their side regarding debt fund financing. Infosys has a low debt ratio. Thus, it depends more on one's own equity instead of borrowing, reducing the risk. This stable ratio implies good solvency and limited reliance on external funding. It also allows the company to inject capital for future investment without overleveraging its financial structure (Issa and Gevorkyan, 2022).

Equity Ratio

In both years, the equity ratio remained at 1.13, indicating that Infosys depends largely on shareholder equity rather than liabilities to fund its assets. A key sign of financial strength and stability, a high equity ratio means that Infosys is a low-risk investment for shareholders. A high equity ratio means the company can be financially independent and reduce its vulnerability to a weakening economy or interest rate volatility (Reyad et al., 2022).

Infosys has consistently held its financial and operational stability during both years. A well-balanced financial structure improved profitability, liquidity, and asset management. Profitability ratios continue to look strong. However, rising costs will require watching over as the key to long-term growth. Also, the low reliance on debt lends Infosys considerable resilience, which makes the company better positioned to expand and maintain financial security in the future.

3.2 Make justified recommendations for process improvements to a specific organisation.

Improving Operating Profit Margin via Strengthening Cost Management

From 2023 to 2024 operational costs increased, which reduced Infosys’s operating profit margin from 36.00% in 2023 to 35.81% in 2024. While the falloff is modest, it nonetheless implies that ignoring rising costs would impede longer-run profit. Such a zero based budgeting model can lead to having use of every cost before being allocated. Further reduction of the IT infrastructure maintenance expenses can be achieved by optimising infrastructure costs by reducing the data centres and minimizing the use of the expensive infrastructure by shifting to cost-efficient cloud solutions (Reyad et al., 2022). Reduction in fixed costs will be possible by outsourcing the non-core activities like administrative support and legal services to the specialized agencies while ensuring service quality. Procurement cost savings can also be achieved by renegotiating vendor contracts for IT infrastructure, software licenses, and consulting services to improve the company’s profitability (Fazekas and Blum, 2021).

Improving Trade Receivables Collection to Provide a Better Cash Flow

While trade receivables turnover days had improved from 46.23 to 44.94 during 2024, it indicates a slightly faster collection period. At the same time, the amount of money that is sitting in outstanding invoices is impressive. One way you may encourage faster collections is by introducing early payment discounts for customers who pay within 15 to 30 days. One way to eliminate the delays is to implement AI-powered invoice tracking systems to send automated reminders, track late payments, and escalate collection efforts more efficiently (Kailash Wamanrao Kalare et al., 2024). However, further minimizing the collection risks is strengthening credit control policies through stricter credit checks in line with giving credit and adjusting the credit terms to slow-paying customers. Infosys can also follow factoring services, where Infosys can sell receivables to third parties at a discounted rate to get immediate cash flow and reduce dependence on delayed payments (Infosys.com, 2021).

Optimal Trade Payables Cycle for Supplier Efficiency

In 2024, Infosys’s trade payables turnover in days stood at 16.28 days, consistent with the supplier payment cycle. While extending payment terms would improve the outflow of cash, it illustrates a strong supplier relationship. A conservative key supplier payment of 30-45 days generates additional working capital but doesn’t risk relationships. Dynamic discounting, where suppliers get paid early at a discounted rate, can save costs and maintain stable supply lines (Huang, 2021). Infosys can utilize supply chain financing solutions where the banks offer credit based on supplier invoices, thereby helping it stretch payment cycles without starving the supplier's cash.

Expanding Asset Utilization to Improve Turnover Efficiency

In 2024, Infosys had a stable asset turnover ratio of 1.59, indicating the company’s stable asset utilization efficiency. Nevertheless, more efficiency and profitability can be obtained from existing assets by maximizing revenue generation from existing assets. One of the best ways to boost a productive workforce is by increasing revenue per employee using high-value consulting services, AI-driven automation and enterprise software solutions. Consolidating the underutilized resources and making the most out of cloud workloads can help maximise IT infrastructure utilization (Helali and Omri, 2021). Revenue growth can be fuelled by the expansion of high-margin service offerings such as data analytics, AI consulting and cybersecurity services, which ensures a lower relationship between the revenue and fixed costs.

Strengthening Debt Management While Preserving Financial Stability

Infosys had a low debt ratio of 0.21 in 2023 and 2024, which shows how little Infosys relied on debt finance. While this is good from a financial strength perspective, at the same time, this hints that they are underusing low-cost debt for expansion. Innovation can be funded by debt as a way to initiate strategic growth initiatives such as R&D, acquisitions, and emerging technology investments without depleting cash flow (Bellucci, Pennacchio and Zazzaro, 2023). It can also help refinance high-cost debt or issue corporate bonds at competitive rates in terms of interest-paying and financial flexibility.

AI & Cloud-Based Solutions for Process Automation

Infosys is in the technology industry, and it is vital to increase operational efficiency when it comes to automation and AI adoption. Payroll processing, customer support, and cybersecurity monitoring business process automation with AI technology can reduce overheads and increase the speed of service (Rane et al., 2024). Predictive maintenance driven by AI, predictive of IT infrastructure failures, will result in less downtime and increased productivity. New revenue streams can be created from expanding cloud migration for enterprises that will diminish their dependency on traditional IT service models.

Improving Employee Productivity and Workforce Retention

For Infosys’s long-term survival, retaining and increasing workforce productivity is crucial. Reducing hiring costs can be introduced by introducing AI-powered HR analytics to predict employee attrition and take proactive measures to maintain them (Shobhanam and Sumati, 2023). Digital learning platforms and continuous performance tracking can help enhance employee training programs to guarantee that employee skills development coincides with industry demands.

Discuss the benefits and limitations of ratios

Benefits of Financial Ratios

Improved Financial Analysis and Decision-Making

Financial ratios offer a structured way of examining a company’s financial state to inform decisions made by the stakeholders (Harinurdin, 2023). These ratios are used by investors, creditors, and management to analyse profitability, liquidity, efficiency, solvency, etc. to strategize better.

Comparative Performance Evaluation

Ratios assist businesses in comparing their financial performance over various periods to see whether the values are changing or just a trend. In addition, they support benchmarking against industry competitors, allowing organizations to understand best their standing and what they could improve upon (Abebe, 2022).

Assessing Profitability and Efficiency

Along with the profitability ratios that measure one’s earnings compared to the assets, return on assets (ROA) and net profit margin indicate overall operational efficiency. Asset Turnover and Inventory Turnover are efficiency ratios that indicate how well a company uses its assets to generate revenue (Alarussi, 2021).

Liquidity and Solvency Assessment

Current Ratio and Quick Ratio help a company determine how many short-term assets it holds relative to its short-term liabilities (Alarussi, 2021).

Early Detection of Financial Problems

Financial ratios act like warning lights that alert companies to weaknesses that may become major financial problems if not dealt with at the right moment. Management can take corrective action to avoid financial distress if liquidity ratios decline or leverage ratios increase significantly (Paul and Mukherjee, 2018).

Feeling overwhelmed by your assignment?

Get assistance from our PROFESSIONAL ASSIGNMENT WRITERS to receive 100% assured AI-free and high-quality documents on time, ensuring an A+ grade in all subjects.

Simplified Financial Reporting for Non-Experts

Ratios are a simplified yet effective means for investors and stakeholders without extensive accounting knowledge to interpret financial statements. Ratios can be used because instead of analyzing cumbersome balance sheets and income statements, stakeholders have a quick understanding of economic performance (Paul and Mukherjee, 2018).

Limitations of Financial Ratios

Lack of Consideration for External Factors

Financial ratios are calculated from historical financial information without considering external factors such as economic conditions, inflation, changes in interest rates and political risk (Takamatsu and Lopes Fávero, 2019). Ratios, however, do not indicate that a company will be strong against external challenges.

Variations in Accounting Practices

Comparing ratios to one another may be difficult because different companies have different accounting policies. Even though depreciation methods, inventory valuation (FIFO or LIFO) and revenue recognition policies can vary, revisions in the financial ratios can lead to approximations that complicate benchmarking correctly (Juhro, Syarifuddin and Sakti, 2025).

Limited Use for Future Predictions

Ratios give insights based on previous financial data but will not guarantee that future performance will be the same as last (Juhro, Syarifuddin and Sakti, 2025). Now, a profitable company may not be very long when the industry is disrupted in the future for reasons beyond operational inefficiencies.

One-Dimensional Analysis

Financial ratios alone do not constitute a complete picture of how much of a financial health a company is in. You can get misleading conclusions by studying ratios from management expertise, innovation, brand strength, and competitive positioning (Anderson, Chowdhury and Uddin, 2024).

Difficulties in Interpreting Industry-Specific Ratios

Ratio analysis of some industries poses unique problems of their own. Take, for instance, a technology company with high R&D costs that will report lower profitability ratios, and a retail business with high inventory turnover may look to be highly efficient while both are making thin profit margins (Anderson, Chowdhury and Uddin, 2024).

Potential for Financial Manipulation

Companies may place their earnings or values on the financial statement through earnings management or financial statement manipulation and favourably present the ratios. Ratios are easily distorted by artificially inflating revenue, deferring expenses or altering asset valuations, which can mislead investors and stakeholders (Moramarco, 2023).

3M1 Analyse the usefulness of accounting ratios when evaluating accounting records.

Assessing Financial Performance and Profitability

Accounting ratios help clarify a company’s profitability picture and are of great use in evaluating a company's financial performance. Some ratios like net profit margin, return on assets (ROA), and return on equity (ROE) determine how efficiently a company generates profits from its revenues and assets (Moramarco, 2023). It lets investors and management analyze trends over time to see if profitability is trending up or down. If ROE remains high consistently, the use of shareholders' funds is efficient, and if Net Profit Margin is declining, it means the costs are rising or operations are underperforming (Hussain et al., 2021).

Liquidity and Solvency Measuring for Financial Stability

Liquidity and solvency ratios enable businesses to assess their capacity to meet the short-term and long-term obligations. The Current Ratio and Quick Ratio indicate whether or not a company possesses sufficient liquid assets to cover its short-term liabilities (Hussain et al., 2021). However, a low liquidity ratio may be a warning sign of difficulties with cash flow, resulting in delayed payments and operational problems. Solvency can be achieved through the debt-to-equity ratio and interest coverage ratio, determining how much a company relies on debt financing (Arhinful and Radmehr, 2023). A high Debt-to-equity ratio indicates financial risk; however, a high-interest coverage ratio indicates a firm’s ability to pay off interest on borrowed funds.

Comparative Analysis for Benchmarking Against Industry Standards

One of the key uses of accounting ratios is that they can be used to compare a company’s performance to similar companies within the industry or benchmarks, as well as comparatives, either against historical data, against other companies, or in comparison to other industry norms (Arhinful and Radmehr, 2023). Management can also determine whether the company is operating efficiently by analysing ratios such as Gross Profit Margin and Asset Turnover for other companies in the same industry. Another example would be if the company’s gross profit margin is less than the industry’s, which means pricing, high production cost, or inefficiencies in cost management. A high Inventory Turnover Ratio compared to competitors shows that the firm manages its stock very efficiently (Alnaim and Kouaib, 2023). Conversely, a low ratio could indicate the firm holding too much stock or not selling very well. Ratio analysis offers essential insights for strategic decision-making based on benchmarking.

Identifying Trends and Financial Risk

Ratio analysis determines financial risks and trends before becoming significant problems. Businesses can examine historical ratio trends and identify declining liquidity, increasing leverage, and rising unrecovered asset value above replacement costs (Alnaim and Kouaib, 2023). If the Current Ratio of a company declines consistently, there may be a rise in short-term liabilities or a decline in cash, and immediate corrective measures may be required. Declining Return on Assets (ROA) may indicate that the company's efforts to invest in assets are not generating adequate returns (Breivik et al., 2021).

Simplifying Financial Data for Decision-Making

Accounting ratios aid in decoding complex financial statements for investors, managers, and external stakeholders to arrive at a sensible performance evaluation. Ratio analysis plays a crucial role as many data in financial statements are not easily interpretable (Breivik et al., 2021). For example, knowing how much a company has in total liabilities and assets is insufficient to show financial health unless a company calculates its debt-to-equity ratio. Similarly, the net profit margin cannot be judged by analysing revenue alone. Ratios allow one to simplify financial records, and they are available to help with decision-making without the need for deep expertise in finances (Jenkins, 2024).

Limitations and Considerations When Using Ratios

Accounting ratios can be useful, though they are limited in various ways (Olayinka, 2022). Ratio analysis is affected by variations in the accounting policies, economic conditions and industry-specific factors. Different businesses have different ones to remember, such as depreciation policies, revenue recognition, and inventory valuation techniques, making comparing direct ratios challenging. Secondly, ratios are based on historical financial statements and sometimes do not indicate future performance (Kim, Muhn and Nikolaev, 2024). Companies can also work on any financial figures to portray their chosen ratios in the most favourable light to pull certain kinds of analysis. Ratio analysis should be supported using qualitative assessments, industry comparisons and broader financial reviews to ensure accuracy.

3D1 Evaluate international differences in financial reporting.

International financial reporting is dependent on accounting standards, regulatory environment, economic framework and cultural hue. IFRS and GAAP are the two most used financial reporting systems around the globe (Bathla, Sharma and Kandpal, 2024). There is no uniform convention for doing financial reporting for all systems because companies have their own way of reporting their financial statements, and recognising revenue and value of assets.

The International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) offers International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are principle-based accounting standards. Indeed, over 140 countries use IFRS, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia and many Asian and African countries (Bathla, Sharma and Kandpal, 2024). The IERF framework emphasises fair value accounting, where assets and liabilities are recorded at their current market value instead of historical cost. The revenue recognition model followed by IFRS is a uniform model for revenues across industries so that financial reporting becomes uniform for various industries (Rouvolis, 2022). A second important aspect of IFRS is that it is very transparent about disclosure and financial information, so companies must provide precise details in their notes and explanations in their financial statements.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) is an accounting system based primarily on the United States and is based on the rules (CFI Team, 2019). The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) governs, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission oversees it. Unlike the IFRS, the GAAP relies heavily on existing accounting on a historical cost basis, whereby the assets and liabilities are acknowledged at their original cost of purchase. The revenue recognition rule under GAAP is more structured but less flexible due to specific detailed rules under different industries. For the companies that follow GAAP, there are very strict determinations for how financial statements should be presented, such as reporting separate comprehensive income (CFI Team, 2019). GAAP standardization reduces the risk of misinterpretation but deprives management of the professional judgment it needs to report in the financials.

Differences between IFRS and GAAP impact financial reporting in several ways. The most significant difference regards how assets are valued. The use of fair value measurement for assets under IFRS can lead to more volatile financial statements because of changes in market conditions (Imhanzenobe, 2022). On the other hand, GAAP is primarily based on historical cost, which contributes to stability but may not reflect the current economic value of assets. The other area of difference is inventory valuation. Whereas GAAP permits using the Last In, First Out (LIFO) method, IFRS does not. Thus, IFRS reporting companies may have different cost structures and tax implications than GAAP reporting companies (Imhanzenobe, 2022).

The two frameworks also vary in how they recognize revenue. Under IFRS 15, a single revenue recognition model, IFRS follows a five-step process to recognize revenue across industries consistently (Kvaal et al., 2023). However, GAAP has multiple revenue recognition rules based in the industry, making cross-industry comparisons harder to do. Other areas of variation include financial statement presentation (Kvaal et al., 2023). Comprehensive income and the statement of comprehensive income are required under IFRS and allowed or required under GAAP to present comprehensive income separately or in the income statement.

Due to the differences in financial reporting internationally, multinational corporations face challenges in reporting financials. The two companies shall report significantly different profit margins, interest rates, and liability values as IFRS requires (Kvaal et al., 2023). Without this uniformity, however, investors and analysts have trouble comparing one company’s financial performance to another in global markets. Financial reporting becomes more expensive and complex for companies operating in multiple countries, which must comply with distinct regulatory frameworks (Dudycz and Praźników, 2020). Usually, they have to make dual financial statements in compliance with IFRS and GAAP.

These differences should also be considered when investors and stakeholders evaluate a company's financial statements. The latter may appear more profitable since GAAP and IFRS reporting companies differ between revenue recognition and asset valuation (Dudycz and Praźników, 2020). Investors need to adjust financial figures to compare companies that use different reporting standards in the same terms.

Various efforts are underway to converge the IFRS and GAAP to develop a single global accounting framework (Bengtsson and Argento, 2023). Although the U.S. has not yet adopted IFRS, considerable progress has been made in aligning specific standards, including lease accounting. Ultimately, the objective is greater consistency and comparability in global financial reporting (Bengtsson and Argento, 2023). However, differences in the regulatory environment, business culture, and economic structure exist in different countries.

Besides the requirements of IFRS and GAAP, various financial reporting frameworks are used in different countries. The Chinese Accounting Standards (CAS) adhere to IFRS but are supplemented with new rules for state-owned enterprises and financial institutions (Chen et al., 2020). Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) were primarily based on IFRS but were modified to conform with local business practices; for that reason, India has adopted it. For Japan, the use of Japanese GAAP (JGAAP) differs from IFRS in areas such as impairment testing and goodwill amortization. IFRS applies for listed companies in the European Union, but some local tax and legal requirements result in minuscule provisos to financial reporting across the EU member states (European Parliament, 2024).

Explain the different financial reporting methods and their differences.

The reporting methods differ among countries because of variations in accounting frameworks, regulatory requirements, and economic environments. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) were utilized among the two most commonly used financial reporting methods (European Parliament, 2024). There are different principles for each system of preparing financial statements, revenue recognition, asset valuation, and reporting structure.

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is the globally accepted accounting framework based on the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Over 140 countries use the IFRS, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and many others in Asia and Africa. The IFRS framework is principle-based and provides for professional judgment in financial reporting rather than requiring strict rules (Cabán, 2024). This flexibility allows companies to produce financial statements based on the economic reality of a transaction. Fair value accounting is a key feature of IFRS whereby assets and liabilities are recorded at market value. It also applies the single revenue recognition model of IFRS 15, which standardizes where and how companies across industries can recognize income for their goods or services sold (Gardi, Aga and Abdullah, 2023). IFRS is another key characteristic because it requires companies to disclose with comprehensive disclosure, which demands them to give detailed notes and explanations to prevent obscurity.

References

  • Abebe, A.A. (2022). The effect of IFRS on the financial ratios: Evidence from banking sector in the emerging economy. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2113495.
  • Akhtar, M., Yusheng, K., Haris, M., Ain, Q.U. and Javaid, H.M. (2021). Impact of financial leverage on sustainable growth, market performance, and profitability. Economic Change and Restructuring, 55(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-021-09321-z.
  • Al Najjar, M., Ghanem, M.G. and Higazi, W. (2024). Accounting errors that influence value added tax reporting quality: A study of accounting and regulation. Journal of Governance and Regulation, [online] 13(3), pp.189–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i3art16.
  • Alarussi, A.S.A. (2021). Financial ratios and efficiency in Malaysian listed companies. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 5(2), pp.116–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-06-2020-0014.
  • Alnaim, M. and Kouaib, A. (2023). Inventory Turnover and Firm Profitability: A Saudi Arabian Investigation. Processes, [online] 11(3), p.716. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030716.
  • Anderson, K., Chowdhury, A. and Uddin, M. (2024). Piotroski’s Fscore under varying economic conditions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01331-y.
  • Andries, P., Clarysse, B. and Costa, S. (2021). Technology ventures’ engagement of external actors in the search for viable market applications: On the relevance of Technology Broadcasting and Systematic Validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(6), p.106145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106145.
  • Arhinful, R. and Radmehr, M. (2023). The Impact of Financial Leverage on the Financial Performance of the Firms Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. SAGE Open, 13(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231204099.
  • Azzali, S. and Mazza, T. (2020). Effects of financial restatements on top management team dismissal. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(3), pp.485–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-06-2019-0191.
  • Barker, R., Lennard, A., Penman, S. and Teixeira, A. (2021). Accounting for intangible assets: suggested solutions. Accounting and Business Research, [online] 52(6), pp.1–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1938963.
  • Bathla, S., Sharma, A.K. and Kandpal, V. (2024). Stakeholders’ Response to IFRS adoption/ convergence on accounting quality and disclosures: A bibliometric review of Scopus database. Heliyon, [online] 10(1), p.e23912. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23912.
  • Beck, T. (2023). Access to finance: adaptability and resilience during a global pandemic. Accounting and Business Research, 53(5), pp.565–579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2023.2219153.
  • Bellucci, A., Pennacchio, L. and Zazzaro, A. (2023). Debt financing of SMEs: The certification role of R&D subsidies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90(13), pp.102903–102903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102903.
  • Bengtsson, M. and Argento, D. (2023). International Accounting Convergence and Divergence: Towards a Framework for Understanding De Jure Adoption of IFRS. Accounting in Europe, 20(3), pp.1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2237056.
  • Bhasin, M.L. (2017). Role of Forensic Accounting to Strengthen Corporate Governance: An Empirical Study. International Convergence Management Association, 5(1), pp.17–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.20482/jemm.2017.5.1.1.
  • Bhattacharya, S. (2022). TCS announces to launch quantum computing lab on AWS. [online] TechGig. Available at: https://cio.techgig.com/technology/tcs-announces-to-launch-quantum-computing-lab-on-aws/articleshow_b2b/95846050.cms [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Bhimavarapu, V.M., Rastogi, S., Kanoujiya, J. and Rawal, A. (2023). Repercussion of financial distress and corporate disclosure on the valuation of non-financial firms in India. Future Business Journal, 9(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00248-7.
  • Breivik, J., Larsen, N.M., Thyholdt, S.B. and Myrland, Ø. (2021). Measuring inventory turnover efficiency using stochastic frontier analysis: building materials and hardware retail chains in Norway. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, [online] 10(1), pp.1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2021.1964635.
  • Burke, J.W. (2019). Homepage. [online] Fortune. Available at: https://fortune.com/ [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Cabán, D. (2024). Principles versus rules based standards: Differential impact on accounting quality and relevance. Journal of corporate accounting & finance/˜The œJournal of corporate accounting & finance. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22724.
  • Carnegie, G.D., Ferri, P., Parker, L.D., Sidaway, S.I.L. and Tsahuridu, E.E. (2022). Accounting as Technical, Social and Moral Practice: The Monetary Valuation of Public Cultural, Heritage and Scientific Collections in Financial Reports. Australian Accounting Review, 32(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12371.
  • CFI Team (2019). GAAP. [online] Corporate Finance Institute. Available at: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/accounting/gaap/ [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Chavan, M., Gowan, S. and Vogeley, J. (2022). Collaborative corporate social responsibility praxis: case studies from India. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(2), pp.229–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-06-2021-0216.
  • Chen, C., Lo, K., Tsang, D. and Zhang, J. (2020). Understanding accounting discretion in China: An analysis of fair value reporting for investment property. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(4), p.106766. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106766.
  • Choudhary, P., Merkley, K. and Schipper, K. (2021). Immaterial Error Corrections and Financial Reporting Reliability*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(4), pp.2423–2460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12713.
  • Dudycz, T. and Praźników, J. (2020). Does the Mark-to-Model Fair Value Measure Make Assets Impairment Noisy?: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(4), p.1504. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041504.
  • Dwivedi, R., Prasad, K., Mandal, N., Singh, S., Vardhan, M. and Pamucar, D. (2020). Performance evaluation of an insurance company using an integrated Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Best-Worst Method (BWM). Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), pp.33–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2104033d.
  • Edy, T.I., Yanti, L.D., Aprilyanti, R. and Janamarta, S. (2021). Analysis of the Compliance Level of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Taxpayers after the implementation of Government Regulation Number 23 of 2018. eCo-Buss, 3(3), pp.103–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.32877/eb.v3i3.203.
  • European Parliament (2024). Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and ... [online] Europa.eu. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/LSU/?uri=oj:JOL_2002_243_R_0001_01 [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Fazekas, M. and Blum, J. (2021). Improving Public Procurement Outcomes Review of Tools and the State of the Evidence Base. [online] Available at: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/656521623167062285/pdf/Improving-Public-Procurement-Outcomes-Review-of-Tools-and-the-State-of-the-Evidence-Base.pdf.
  • Gardi, B., Abdalla Hamza, P., Sabir, B.Y., Mahmood Aziz, H., Sorguli, S., Abdullah, N.N. and Al-Kake, F. (2021). Investigating the Effects of Financial Accounting Reports on Managerial Decision Making in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. [online] papers.ssrn.com. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3838226.
  • Gardi, B., Aga, M. and Abdullah, N.N. (2023). Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting Quality: The Mediation Role of IFRS. Sustainability, [online] 15(13), p.9869. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139869.
  • Giany Febriyanti, Simon, Z.Z. and Dinda Oktavia (2024). The Effect of Liquidity, Leverage, Efficiency, and Inflation on Financial Performance. Research of Finance and Banking, [online] 2(1), pp.1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.58777/rfb.v2i1.212.
  • Górowski, I., Kurek, B. and Szarucki, M. (2022). The Impact of a New Accounting Standard on Assets, Liabilities and Leverage of Companies: Evidence from Energy Industry. Energies, [online] 15(4), p.1293. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041293.
  • Harinurdin, E. (2023). The Influence of Financial Ratio and Company Reputation on Company Stock Prices Financial Sector. Proceedings, [online] 83(1), p.47. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083047.
  • Hartmann, B. (2021). Current value as relational becoming: the case of goodwill impairment testing. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-08-2020-0140.
  • Hawk, B.E. (2024). Family, Partnerships and Companies. SSRN Electronic Journal, [online] 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4690369.
  • Hayat, M.A., Islam, S. and Hossain, M.F. (2024). Securing the Cloud Infrastructure: Investigating Multi-tenancy Challenges, Modern Solutions and Future Research Opportunities. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 16(4), pp.1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2024.04.01.
  • Helali, L. and Omri, M.N. (2021). A survey of data center consolidation in cloud computing systems. Computer Science Review, 39(13), p.100366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100366.
  • Huang, X. (2021). Financing Disruptive Suppliers: Payment Advance, Timeline, and Discount Rate. Production and Operations Management, 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13597.
  • Hung, D.N., Van, V.T.T. and Archer, L. (2023). Factors affecting the quality of financial statements from an audit point of view: A machine learning approach. Cogent Business & Management, [online] 10(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2184225.
  • Hussain, S., Nguyen, V.C., Nguyen, Q.M., Nguyen, H.T. and Nguyen, T.T. (2021). Macroeconomic factors, working capital management, and firm performance—A static and dynamic panel analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00778-x.
  • Hussinki, H., King, T., Dumay, J. and Steinhöfel, E. (2024). Accounting for intangibles: a critical review. Journal of accounting literature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-05-2022-0060.
  • Imhanzenobe, J. (2022). Value relevance and changes in accounting standards: A review of the IFRS adoption literature. Cogent Business & Management, [online] 9(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2039057.
  • Infosys.com (2021). TO ALL STOCK EXCHANGES BSE LIMITED NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. [online] Available at: https://www.infosys.com/investors/documents/form-20f-press-release-11jun2021.pdf [Accessed 27 Jul. 2024].
  • Issa, S. and Gevorkyan, A.V. (2022). Optimal corporate leverage and speculative cycles: an empirical estimation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, [online] 62(3), pp.478–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.06.002.
  • Jenkins, A. (2024). Inventory Turnover Ratio: Trouble or Paradise? [online] Oracle NetSuite. Available at: https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/inventory-management/inventory-turnover-ratio.shtml [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Jordan, E. (2024). Generative AI (Gen AI) for Business weekly update#13. [online] Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/@eugina.jordan/generative-ai-gen-ai-for-business-weekly-update-13-192dd5167054 [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Juhro, S.M., Syarifuddin, F. and Sakti, A. (2025). Inflation, Exchange Rates, and Interest Rates. Inclusive Welfare, pp.323–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0051-9_10.
  • Kailash Wamanrao Kalare, Bhagat, D., Kapil Kamalakar Jajulwar, Bhave, R., Raut, S.V. and Sanjay Dorle (2024). The Power of Intelligent Automation. Advances in business information systems and analytics book series, 6, pp.27–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3354-9.ch002.
  • Karapavlovic, N., Obradovic, V. and Bogicevic, J. (2020). The use of historical cost and fair value for property and plant and equipment measurement: Evidence from the Republic of Serbia. Ekonomski anali, 65(227), pp.95–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.2298/eka2027095k.
  • Kim, A., Muhn, M. and Nikolaev, V. (2024). Financial Statement Analysis with Large Language Models. [online] arXiv.org. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17866.
  • Kvaal, E., Löw, E., Farkas, Z.N., Panaretou, A., Renders, A. and Sampers, P. (2023). Classification and Measurement under IFRS 9: A Commentary and Suggestions for Future Research. Accounting in Europe, pp.1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2253808.
  • Lassoued, N. and Khanchel, I. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Earnings Management: An Evidence from Financial Reporting in European Firms. Global Business Review, 12, p.097215092110534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211053491.
  • Lev, B. (2018). The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it. Accounting and Business Research, [online] 48(5), pp.465–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1470138.
  • Lukason, O. and Camacho-Miñano, M.-M. (2019). Bankruptcy Risk, Its Financial Determinants and Reporting Delays: Do Managers Have Anything to Hide? Risks, 7(3), p.77. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7030077.
  • Magli, F., Nobolo, A. and Ogliari, M. (2018). The Effects on Financial Leverage and Performance: The IFRS 16. International Business Research, 11(8), p.76. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v11n8p76.
  • Makhazhanova, U., Kerimkhulle, S., Mukhanova, A., Bayegizova, A., Aitkozha, Z., Mukhiyadin, A., Tassuov, B., Saliyeva, A., Taberkhan, R. and Azieva, G. (2022). The Evaluation of Creditworthiness of Trade and Enterprises of Service Using the Method Based on Fuzzy Logic. Applied Sciences, 12(22), p.11515. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211515.
  • Morales, P., Flikkema, M., Castaldi, C. and Man, A.-P. de (2022). The effectiveness of appropriation mechanisms for sustainable innovations from small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 374(13), p.133921. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133921.
  • Moramarco, G. (2023). Financial-cycle ratios and medium-term predictions of GDP: Evidence from the United States. International Journal of Forecasting. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.05.007.
  • Napier, C.J. and Stadler, C. (2020). The Real Effects of a New Accounting standard: the Case of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Accounting and Business Research, [online] 50(5), pp.474–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1770933.
  • Nechaev, A. (2020). Analysis Of The Calculation Of Depreciation In Modern Conditions. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.57.
  • Ngoc, T., Nguyen, X.H. and Pham, K. (2023). The Effect of Capital Structure on Firm Value: A Study of Companies Listed on the Vietnamese Stock Market. International Journal of Financial Studies, [online] 11(3), pp.100–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030100.
  • Nilsson, K. and Nilsson, E. (2021). Organisational Measures and Strategies for a Healthy and Sustainable Extended Working Life and Employability—A Deductive Content Analysis with Data Including Employees, First Line Managers, Trade Union Representatives and HR-Practitioners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), p.5626. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115626.
  • Olayinka, A.A. (2022). Financial Statement Analysis as a Tool for Investment Decisions and Assessment of Companies’ Performance. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 4(1), pp.49–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v4i1.852.
  • Olayinka, A.A. (2022). Financial Statement Analysis as a Tool for Investment Decisions and Assessment of Companies’ Performance. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 4(1), pp.49–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v4i1.852.
  • Paul, P. and Mukherjee, P.M. (2018). A Critical Analysis of the Financial Efficiency of the Steel Industry in India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, [online] 12(3-4), pp.242–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510x17696651.
  • Prasetya Margono, F. and Gantino, R. (2021). INFLUENCE OF FIRM SIZE, LEVERAGE, PROFITABILITY, AND DIVIDEND POLICY ON FIRM VALUE OF COMPANIES IN INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 10(2), pp.45–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.12775/cjfa.2021.007.
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2019). IFRS 16 Leases expands the balance sheet | Disclose. [online] PwC. Available at: https://www.pwc.ch/en/insights/disclose/24/ifrs-16-leases-standard-expands-the-balance-sheet.html [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Rane, N., Paramesha, M., Choudhary, S. and Rane, J. (2024). Partners Universal International Innovation Journal (PUIIJ) Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Advanced Business Strategies: A Review. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Advanced Business Strategies: A Review, [online] 2(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12208298.
  • Reyad, H.M., Zariyawati, M.A., Ong, T.S. and Muhamad, H. (2022). The Impact of Macroeconomic Risk Factors, the Adoption of Financial Derivatives on Working Capital Management, and Firm Performance. Sustainability, 14(21), p.14447.
  • Rouvolis, S. (2022). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Exploring Financial Evidence from Listed Companies in the US. Open Journal of Accounting, 11(04), pp.283–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2022.114014.
  • Russo, K. (2022). What are the risks of inaccurate financial reporting? [online] Oracle NetSuite. Available at: https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/accounting/inaccurate-financial-reporting.shtml [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Rusydi, M. (2021). The Impact of CEO Narcissism Behavior on Firm Performance through Earnings Management. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 4(1), pp.53–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v4i1.164.
  • Sari, I.M., Anugrah, R. and Nasir, A. (2020). Effect of Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance. JOURNAL OF AUDITING, FINANCE, AND FORENSIC ACCOUNTING, 8(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.21107/jaffa.v8i2.7449.
  • Schoenmaker, D. and Schramade, W. (2023). Reporting and Investor Relations. Springer texts in business and economics, pp.497–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35009-2_17.
  • Schutte, W.D., Verster, T., Doody, D., Raubenheimer, H. and Coetzee, P.J. (2020). A proposed benchmark model using a modularised approach to calculate IFRS 9 expected credit loss. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), p.1735681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1735681.
  • Shobhanam, K. and Sumati, S. (2023). AI-Powered Workforce Analytics: Maximizing Business and Employee Success through Predictive Attrition Modelling. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 19(3), p.203. doi:https://doi.org/10.23940/ijpe.23.03.p6.203215.
  • Świecka, B., Terefenko, P. and Paprotny, D. (2021). Transaction factors’ influence on the choice of payment by Polish consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, [online] 58, p.102264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102264.
  • Takamatsu, R.T. and Lopes Fávero, L.P. (2019). Financial indicators, informational environment of emerging markets and stock returns. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(3), pp.253–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-10-2018-0102.
  • TCS (2023). Integrated nnual Report Backdrop: TCS Gitanjali Park Campus, Kolkata, India. [online] Available at: https://www.tcs.com/content/dam/tcs/investor-relations/financial-statements/2023-24/ar/annual-report-2023-2024.pdf [Accessed 19 Feb. 2025].
  • Thi, H., Nguyen, H.-B. and Nguyen, V.C. (2023). Analysis of factors affecting the adoption of IFRS in an emerging economy. HELIYON, [online] 9(6), pp.e17331–e17331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17331.
  • Weber, I.M. and Wasner, E. (2023). Sellers’ inflation, Profits and conflict: Why Can Large Firms Hike Prices in an emergency? Review of Keynesian Economics, 11(2), pp.183–213.
  • Zhao, J., Ouenniche, J. and De Smedt, J. (2024). Survey, Classification and Critical Analysis of the Literature on Corporate Bankruptcy and Financial Distress Prediction. Machine Learning with Applications, [online] p.100527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100527.
  • Zlati, M.L., Antohi, V.M. and Cardon, P. (2019). Correction of Accounting Errors through Post Balance Sheet Event Analysis for Romanian Companies. Economies, 7(2), p.29. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7020029.

Recently Downloaded Samples by Customers

Unit 2 Core Financial Management Assignment Sample

Task 1 Business Report Introduction Financial management implies to the process of planning, acquiring, managing and controlling...View and Download

U14856 Business and Tourism Management Assignment Sample

Introduction to Business and Tourism Management Assignment The enterprise is about the initiative to manage and create novel...View and Download

The Impact of COVID - 19 on the UK Tourism Sector Assignment Sample

Introduction Get free samples written by our Top-Notch subject experts for taking assignment help uk services...View and Download

BTM5EIT Entrepreneurship in Tourism Assignment Sample

Introduction: Entrepreneurship in Tourism Entrepreneurship refers to process of creating, establishing and managing the new...View and Download

Organizational Behaviour Help for Academic Success Assignment Sample

Introduction Get expert assistance with our well-researched content. Assignment Helper ensure originality, accuracy, and...View and Download

Medication administration Assignment Sample

Introduction The purpose of this reflection is to demonstrate the clinical skill of medication administration and relate it to...View and Download

Get 55% Off on Black Friday - Limited Time Academic Offer