NUR3045 Innovation to Transformation in Nursing Practice Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads564
• Pages20
• Words5045

Introduction: Innovation to Transformation in Nursing Practice

This study will analyses the increase in poor cleanliness within the nursing role in a Lincolnshire operating theatre. The goal statement of this study is to enhance cleanliness in the nursing role within a Lincolnshire operating theatre from 80 percent to 95 percent in a six month time frame with the help of SMART goals frameworks. The current conditions of Lincolnshire will be discussed with the help of 5 why framework. The rootcause4 analysis will discussed with the help of fishbone diagram and the finding of 5 why framework and fishbone diagrams will be also discussed in this study. The countermeasures implications and different implementation plan will also demonstrated in this study in an effective way which will be help to resolve the problem statement and achieve the goal. The implementation plan will be discussed with the utilisation of PDSA cycle (plan, do, study, and act) and some suggestions will be also mentioned to resolve the issue.

Reference materials and sample papers are provided to help students understand assignment structure and improve academic skills. We, as the best assignment helper offer guidance while maintaining original work. The NUR3045 Innovation to Transformation in Nursing Practice sample highlights clear structure, skill application, and reflective academic discussion. These resources are intended solely for study and reference purposes.

Background and Context

Operating theatres require high cleanliness standards to block healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and protect patient security and obtain positive surgical results. The deterioration of clean practices among Lincolnshire operating room staff has established major concerns about safety protocols and national standard adherence (Osagwu et al., 2024). This issue is reflected in studies like NUR3045 Innovation to Transformation in Nursing Practice, which emphasize the role of innovative nursing strategies in improving clinical outcomes. The risk of obtaining surgical site infections (SSIs) climbs to 20% of the total Healthcare-Associated Infections found in the UK because of poor cleaning standards. Following infection prevention protocols exactly as described by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) can eliminate SSIs to the extent of 50%. 

The justification behind the problem

The protection of patients together with complying with existing laws and regulations depends on essential improvements. According to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 healthcare organizations must establish clean and safe environments to stop cross-infection risks (Main, 2022). Noncompliance with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 can trigger enforcement actions by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) during its standard hygiene assessments. The IPC guidelines from NHS England focus on training and monitoring procedures to ensure high cleanliness standards as stated in their guidelines. 

The condition of patient safety along with healthcare results undergoes a substantial negative influence.

Inadequate cleaning practices result in the development of SSIs which halts acute care procedures and drives up both medical expenses and patient death statistics along with extended ICU admissions (Oakley, 2024). The development of SSIs in patients quadruples the chance of hospital readmission while simultaneously increasing their need of intensive care by 60%. Complicated infections in surgical patients may progress to sepsis which becomes fatal. 

Drivers for Change

1. A sterile environment improves patient safety as well as total care quality by decreasing infections.
2. The healthcare facility maintains compliance with CQC rules alongside other relevant organizations through standards requirements that protects its reputation from penalties.

Problem statement

The standard of operating theatre cleanliness in Lincolnshire hospitals has deteriorated substantially among nursing staff throughout recent months. The operating theatre needs clean conditions because they stop infections thus they help protect patients properly and result in positive surgical outcomes. Employee practices that fail to follow hygiene guidelines and incorrect instrument sterilization along with variable adherence to standard procedures have recently come into view (Wildman, 2022). Issues in infection control procedures present both major health threats to patients and negative impacts on hospital reputation and greater risks of surgical complications.

Various factors potentially influence these events including insufficient staff training together with staffing shortages which lead to both staff exhaustion and diminished oversight and also absent continuous monitoring and policy reinforcement of infection controls. The findings align with NUR3045 Innovation to Transformation in Nursing Practice, which demonstrates how structured innovation and staff development in nursing can address similar systemic issues. The situation worsens because healthcare personnel do not receive proper explanation of their roles or sufficient systems to hold them accountable. COVID-19 has made resources more scarce which created additional work for staff while causing them to focus less on high cleanliness standards.

Hospital patients feel severe outcomes when cleanliness standards remain low which results in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and extended hospital durations and additional healthcare expenses alongside possible death (Green, 2022). A comprehensive evaluation of current procedures along with a proper analysis of knowledge gaps and non-compliant areas needs to be followed by specific interventions to boost cleanliness standards. Healthcare providers can restore and sustain high cleanliness standards in Lincolnshire’s operating theatres through enhancements in training together with clear communication and increased accountability measures.

Goal statement (SMART GOAL)

Specific	Measurable	Achievable	Relevant	Time based
The intervention aims to enhance nursing role cleanliness through better adoption of infection control and hygiene procedures in Lincolnshire operating theaters. The establishment of training improvements alongside best practice awareness boosting and a new feedback and monitoring system will reach this achievement.	The initiative will reach a successful outcome as measured through audits and staff evaluations and patient outcome reviews which establish cleanliness protocol adherence at more than 95% starting from 80% baseline.	During six months of standardized safety protocols alongside systematic monitoring activities and refresh training classes for infection prevention nurses achieve practical outcomes.	Throughout practice of sterile environmental procedures the organization achieves its patient safety improvement goal through infection prevention methods.	The goal encompasses reaching 95% compliance within six months yet periodic checks for assessment must occur every two months towards future improvement through necessary adjustments.

Action Plan

1. The healthcare employee will complete needed education about infection prevention along with hygiene standards through mandatory training which must be conducted in repeated manner.
2. The facility of healthcare sector must perform daily cleanliness audits while conducting random spot-checks for monitoring all protocol adherence.
3. A feedback system need to be created which mainly stimulates constructive attention to employee while recognizing those staff who maintain consistent compliance standards.
4. Clear Guidelines need the development of standardized checklists as well as protocols for cleaning and sterilization process which distribution should happen to all employees.
5. The results of audits and staff feedback will guide periodic reviews for continuous improvement which leads to practice refinements.
6. These strategies allow Lincolnshire hospitals to enhance sustainability of superior cleanliness standards which leads to better patient safety and improved care quality.

Root cause analysis

Root cause analysis (RCA) establishes a vital problem-solving method that locates the fundamental reasons behind management problems affecting both processes and systems and final results. RCA enables the examination of supporting elements that result in infection control and hygiene practice weakness in Lincolnshire operating theatres (Oakley, 2024). The analysis identifies the main factors behind inadequate cleanliness in nursing practice by applying both the Fishbone Diagram (Ishikawa Diagram) and 5 Whys Technique tools.

NUR3045 Innovation to Transformation in Nursing Practice Assignment Sample

Liked This Sample? Hire Me Now

Louise Adams 6 Years | MSc

Fishbone Analysis

Potential causes of problems can be organized through the Fishbone Diagram also known as the Cause-and-Effect Diagram into specific main groups. The analysis targets the elements which lead to unsatisfactory cleaning standards in Lincolnshire operating theatre facilities.

Categories Analyzed:

• People (Staff and Training): Staff members receive inadequate training sessions about infection control procedures as part of their ongoing development. Staff members possess varying levels of understanding about the current best procedures. Staff members who experience fatigue and burnout provide insufficient attention during their work. Low staff morale and lack of motivation to adhere to cleanliness protocols.
• Processes and Procedures: Hospital personnel don't follow standard operating procedures (SOPs) because these guidelines were outdated or confusing. Inconsistent monitoring of compliance with hygiene protocols. The organization lacks standardized checklists for performing cleanliness maintenance work in high-risk zones.
• Equipment and Materials: The shortage of sterilized equipment and cleaning supplies exists in the workplace. Poor maintenance of sterilization equipment. Limited access to personal protective equipment (PPE) due to supply shortages (Aschroft and Oakeshott, 2022).
• Environment: Rapid procedures occur because of elevated patient numbers together with heavier workloads. Operating procedures need to be shortened due to insufficient cleaning time between each session. Poor allocation of cleaning responsibilities across shifts.
• Management and Leadership: Insufficient emphasis on infection prevention in performance evaluations. A breakdown of cleanroom cleanliness expectations exists between hospital leaders and nursing staff. Lack of accountability and reinforcement of hygiene practices.
• Measurement and Monitoring: The organization conducts few audits and performance assessments to detect non-compliance areas.

The Fishbone Diagram reveals several essential findings about the problem: The analysis reveals that the problem has multiple components which extend across four domains that include limited staff proficiency and supervisory involvement and procedural shortcomings and financial constraints. Evidence shows that insufficient training combined with inconsistent oversight and weak accountability systems stood out as main factors affecting the ability to improve cleanliness performance in this context.

5 Whys Technique Analysis

The 5 Whys RCA method functions as an easy-to-use screening instrument that maintains power through multiple "why" queries to access genuine problem origins (Griffante, 2024). The investigators used 5 Whys as their primary method to identify the underlying causes of unclean conditions in Lincolnshire operating theatres.

Problem Statement: Healthcare cleanliness in Lincolnshire operating rooms has deteriorated to dangerous levels for patient safety.

Key Findings from the 5 Whys:

The primary reason for unclean facilities identified by the 5 Whys analysis rests in insufficient regular training combined with insufficient professional development (Roberts, 2023). The shortage of time to deliver training emerges because staff face heavy workloads and excessive patient numbers as well as insufficient resources which reveals fundamental organizational issues that demand action at both administrative and regulatory levels.

The investigation through Fishbone analysis alongside 5 Whys creates these results.

• Similarities: The two methods demonstrate that insufficient training represents a common foundational cause. The lack of proper monitoring functions as a contributing element that appears throughout different sections of the analysis. Analysis results match regarding insufficient resources and heavy workload responsibilities which strengthens the evidence that understaffing leads to diminished cleanliness practices.
• Differences: Through its organized structure the Fishbone Diagram shows multiple interconnected factors within one system which creates better visual representation. The additional problems include equipment supply shortages along with communication breakdowns between staff members and operational process issues (Jiang et al., 2021). Through the 5 Whys Technique healthcare workers identify one continual chain of motives which reveals that lack of training occurs due to low professional priority.

Main Causes Identified from RCA Analysis

• Inadequate and Infrequent Training: When refresher courses are insufficient students develop incomplete knowledge that affects their consistent execution of cleanliness protocols. Nursing staff practices remain outdated because mandatory CPD on infection prevention is absent.
• Lack of Continuous Monitoring and Feedback: Staff members are unable to detect deviations from standard procedures because auditing happens infrequently and in real time. Audits conducted regularly enable proper reinforcement of cleanliness protocols which would otherwise remain inconsistently followed.
• Staff Fatigue and Resource Constraints: Staff workload became excessive because of high patient numbers together with insufficient staffing while contributing to substandard adherence to hygiene processes (Dongnadeng and Taneerat, 2023). Extreme exhaustion together with burnout disorder make workers perform poorly which leads to critical mistakes during healthcare processes.
• Inconsistent Accountability and Reinforcement: Without defined penalties for non-compliance healthcare staff implement cleaning protocols in an erratic manner (Rahmana, et al., 2021). When cleanliness responsibilities aren't clearly defined among the staff there is an increased likelihood of disunified work approaches.

Broader Implications of Identified Causes

• Impact on Patient Safety: Less than proper facility hygiene raises patients' surgical site infection (SSI) probabilities while it extends medical procedures and drives up healthcare system fees. Medical research demonstrates SSIs make up 20% of healthcare-acquired infections while also causing a mortality increase of 3% percent.
• Regulatory Compliance and Reputation: Health providers who do not follow standards and regulations listed in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and CQC standards run the risk of inspections and financial penalties together with loss of public trust. Healthcare services experience decreased respect from patients because of unhandled cleanliness problems which produce negative treatment results for patients (Ferguson et al., 2021).
• Financial Implications: Microbes that are preventable through infection protocols escalate national healthcare expenses by £700 million each year throughout the entire UK territory (Downs et al., 2021). Healthcare facilities that prevent infections by keeping their premises clean will create major savings that free up staff and funding resources.

Countermeasure identification

A structured evidence based methodology is adopted to ensure that the identified countermeasures effectively target the root cause and driven to sustainable developments. Approaches similar to those outlined in NUR3045 Innovation to Transformation in Nursing Practice emphasize continuous professional development and systematic monitoring as key strategies to improve compliance and patient safety. This method consisted of the following key stages:

Step 1: Prioritizations of root causes with the use of pareto analysis

Main objective: Focus on the most effective factors contributing to poor cleanliness that, if properly addressed, would yield the highest impact.

A pareto Analysis (80/20 rule) was adopted to rank the identified root causes on the basis of that impact and frequency and root causes contributing to 80 percent of the problem were prioritized for immediate action.

Result: Employees’ fatigue and resource allocation, lack of continuous feedback and monitoring, inadequate and infrequent training are top 3 causes identified for intervention.

Step 2: Benchmarking and brainstorming best practices

Objective: Generate a broad range of potential countermeasures along with benchmark against best practices in infection control and prevention.

Method: Brainstorming sessions were mainly conducted with multidisciplinary, consisting of theatre managers, infection control specialists and nursing employees. Best practices from international and national guidelines, including WHO and NICE standards, were reviews to identify different effective strategies.

Result: A list of potential countermeasures was compiled, with an emphasis on aligning solutions with different evidence based practices (Breitnauer, 2022). Proposed countermeasures

Evaluation of Countermeasures Using Forcefield Analysis

The selection of two crucial countermeasures resulted from a Root Cause Analysis together with Countermeasure Identification process designed to remedy the declining cleanliness levels observed in Lincolnshire operating theatres (Bali, 2024).

Proposed Countermeasures

Mandatory Refresher Training and Continuous Professional Development (CPD)

The goal of this countermeasure is to build staff expertise in infection control through ongoing training sessions with performance evaluations for all nursing caregivers at regular intervals.

Key Elements:

• Bi-annual refresher training sessions.
• Quarterly knowledge assessments.
• Introduction of mandatory CPD hours on infection prevention.

Introduction of Regular Cleanliness Audits and Spot Checks

The organization must enforce sustained protocol compliance through scheduled monitoring and immediate feedback processes alongside needed corrections.

Key Elements:

• Audits and spot checks will serve as scheduled monthly procedures together with unannounced spot checks.
• The provision of a standardized checklist follows CQC and NICE guidelines.
• Staff receives quick feedback together with protocols to resolve non-compliance situations.

Forcefield Analysis: Comparing the Strength of Countermeasures

The decision-making tool Forcefield Analysis measures the relative power of driving forces versus those which restrain the success likelihood for a chosen solution (Oakley, 2024). The evaluation scale uses five values that range from one to five to determine the intensity of each parameter so the proposed countermeasures can be effectively compared against one another.

Comparison and Decision

The total assessment score of +6 demonstrates that both countermeasures possess equivalent influence between driving and restraining forces. Regular Cleanliness Audits and Spot Checks prove to be the better selection as a countermeasure because they meet expectations for implementation feasibility and sustainability and yield positive effects on patient outcomes (Brandon, 2022).

1. Immediate and Measurable Impact:

Regular audits produce immediate feedback data for implementing quick corrective actions thus they enable faster improvement of cleanliness compliance levels (Narayanamurthy et al., 2021).

Organizations use this approach to recognize compliance issues immediately so they can resolve them before problems worsen.

2. Sustained compliance through accountability

• Daily audit promote a culture of accountability, assuring that cleanliness standards are managed in consistent wat.
• Spot checks prohibited complacency by reinforcing adhrence across different shifts.

3. Cost burden and lower time compared to training

• While training needs dedicated resources and time, audits can be integrated into regular operations with minimal disruptions
• The audits of cleanliness mainly rely on existing processes and employees, mking them easier to maintain along with scale.

Countermeasure analysis

The approach of enforcing periodic training together with continuous career development (CPD) for staff and scheduled assessments of the theatre cleanliness formed the basis of addressing the deteriorating standards in Lincolnshire operating theaters. The training program for staff improvement consists of two annual education sessions combined with three-month assessments and required infection control education modules totaling 12 hours (Catalan, 2023). Using this method fulfills both NICE and CQC standards together with staff confidence enhancement while minimizing surgical site infections (SSIs). The application of this approach creates obstacles from scarce time resources and higher expenses along with difficulties in gaining acceptance to transformation. Research through Forcefield Analysis revealed refresher training would create positivity (+6) yet implementation timing (6–12 months) and operational disturbances became barriers to its success (Chadwick, 2023). Regular Cleanliness Audits alongside Spot Checks enable users to detect non-compliance at once while requiring immediate action and maintaining ongoing accountability. A program of monthly audits together with random spot checks and standardized checklists following CQC guidelines promotes a framework for continuous organizational advancement. The assessment of this approach through FFA generated a positive impact (+6) while demonstrating faster and quantifiable methods for cleanliness enhancement.

Implementation plan

Following the 6-month timeframe the implementation plan introduces Regular Cleanliness Audits and Spot Checks with the purpose of raising cleanliness compliance from 80% to 95%. The system guarantees both protocol adherence and responsible follow-up along with gowning and droplet precaution practices (Hao and Shi,, 2023).

Phase 1: Planning and Preparation (Weeks 1–4)

• A dedicated audit team must be established to conduct inspections while including both senior nursing staff and infection control specialists within its member composition.

• The development of audit checklists should integrate CQC and NICE infection control guidelines to create uniform tools for objective assessment procedures.

• Regular compliance checks and official audits are scheduled to occur on a monthly basis together with periodic weekly random checks.

Phase 2: Training and Communication (Weeks 5–8)

• A proper education program should introduce staff members to the audit system and demonstrate their functional responsibilities and cleaning standard requirements.

• The audit team needs to receive training in checking technique along with how to deliver positive information to enhance its effectiveness.

• A communication strategy will enable us to maintain transparent dialogue because we need to respond to employee concerns while developing organizational responsibility.

Phase 3: Implementation and Monitoring (Weeks 9–24)

• Operations should begin their first audit activities and specify what elements need enhancement.

• Staff should receive audit results immediately to see their areas of success as well as actionable recommendations for improving their weak areas.

• The program tracks changes in cleanliness compliance thus enabling necessary changes in the audit scheduling or audit objectives.

During weeks 25–26 the evaluation procedures as well as continuous improvement practices take place (Phase 4).

• Review Performance includes evaluation of the 95% target milestones while examining data collected from audit activities (Yang et al., 2021).

• Review the process by making enhancements to address recurring problems to maintain long-term improvements.

• The standardized approach maintains steady adherence to governance standards and improves both safety for patients and infection prevention practices.

PDSA Cycle

Implementation of any plan that aims to bring about changes and innovation within the current structure must first be implemented. Potential solutions must then be tested utilizing small-cycle testing known as "Plan, Do, Study, Act" (PDSA) cycles. Measuring the effects of changes is crucial for confirming which particular change has had an impact. In the similar way, implementation plans, which have been adopted to check Regular Cleanliness Audits and Spot Checks, have been tested for the best outcome. 

Plan

The problem or area that needs improvement is defined by "PLAN" in this model. Next, in the continuous term, find potential solutions or modifications. Then presents a strategy for testing the modification, along with techniques for gathering data. 

Here in the stated context, this particular section will define the problem of operating theatre cleanliness in Lincolnshire hospitals which has deteriorated substantially among nursing staff, in order to bring improvement. After recognizing the plan proper solution required to be implemented, like establishment of audit for having check over infection control specialists and senior nursing (Peate, 2022). Conduction of staff training programmes, bringing communication strategy which will enable to maintain transparent dialogue among the staff and the clients. The implementation strategy aims to increase cleanliness compliance from 80% to 95% by introducing Regular Cleanliness Audits and Spot Checks after the 6-month period. Along with gowning and micro safety measures, the system ensures responsible follow-up and procedure conformity.

Do

This section discusses the small-scale implementation of the proposed modification in order to generate new concepts. The next step in evaluating the process is to carry out the test, adhering to the specified strategy.

Implementation of the planned solutions over the current situation for bringing changes on a small scale, is the main thing to represent here. Here in this respect an audit team has been enacted to have proper checks on the nursing and other associated staff within the structure of the operating theaters. For the provision of consistent tools for unbiased evaluation processes, audit checklists should incorporate CQC and NICE infection control principles. Along with occasional weekly arbitrary checks, monthly formal audits and routine inspections of compliance are planned.

 Inspection of the different strategies required as to measure the impact and the outcome in order to bring out the disciplinary act over the existing structure. Within the existing structure nursing-stuff should be complied with irrespective works within scheduled and structured process. This step will help in bringing the changes within the existing stuff and operating theater in respect of maintaining cleanliness.

Study

In order to evaluate the effects of the modification to the current operating theater setup, this stage will gather and examine data. The procedure will determine what was learned and what needs to be implemented by comparing the outcomes with the predictions. 

Since the decline in hygienic practices among Lincolnshire operating room staff has raised serious issues regarding safety procedures and conformity to national standards, the current working theater will be reorganized using fresh strategies. A number of procedures have been started that yield attainable results, such as the use of infection prevention refresher training workshops combined with systematic monitoring activities, standardized safety protocols, and checklists that are implemented for six months. These strategies will be tested and checked within this step in order to have knowledge regarding the effect having on the problem-solving process. 

After examining the strategies used, it has been observed that, in the current situation, nurses are not adhering to the correct cleaning procedures due to the strain of a heavy workload. Certain personnel are not receiving adequate study and informational training. Given the state of the modern technological world, the hospital's training program is out of date. Additionally, management has prioritized other areas, ignoring the lack of resources that directly affect the nursing staff's role in maintaining hygiene and the significance of infection control and hygiene.

Act

One must choose whether to embrace, modify, or reject the change based on the study and the strategies offered in this stage (Babikian,2021). If the improvement proves effective, it will be implemented more widely. If not, the best course of action will be to improve the strategy and repeat the cycle.

Here in this step all the strategical implementations will be tested and studied and then based on the results effective strategies will be applied for improvement in the operating theater structure. And if nothing valuable comes out then again this cycle will be replayed to bring effective measures. Therefore repeated training based on the education about infection prevention and hygiene standards should be checked periodically for assessing quality of performance among the \nursing staffs and the other authorities (Gkouliaveras et al., 2025). Regular cleanliness audits while conducting random spot-checks for monitoring protocol adherence considering the facilities provided to the patients. The outcomes of audits and employee input will direct periodic inspections for ongoing advancement, which results in improvements to practices. By using these strategies, hospitals in Lincolnshire are able to maintain high standards of cleanliness, which improves patient safety and the grade of care. In a case where none of the above checks offer positive findings, this cycle will be repeated in order to get better results.

Conclusion

It has been concluded from the above study that cleanliness is an important aspect in every healthcare center’s operational theater and within the overall structure. As these service centers are responsible for giving and securing lives of the people. But in some cases it has been observed that lack of training, assessment and proper check has brought imbalance within the structure. Here, this particular project focuses on bringing improvement by moving compliance percentages from 80% to 95% by the end of six months within deteriorated cleanliness of the operating theatre in Lincolnshire. Several aspects are being adopted in order to meet the objectives. Firstly problems are being discussed to find the exact way out for improvements. Current scenarios are being presented through different analyses like root cause analysis, fishbone analysis, categories analysis and so on. Based on these aspects, implementation of better strategies to bring back the normal terms and cleanliness within the operating theater had been noticed. Therefore, in order to improve cleaning standards, particular measures must be implemented after a thorough assessment of present practices, a correct analysis of knowledge gaps, and a review of incompatible areas. 

Recommendations

Organization must perform ongoing cleanliness inspections together with spontaneous random checks

• The healthcare organization should perform monthly formal audits and weekly random spot checks to verify continuous adherence to infection control protocols.

• The assessments must use standardized checklists that follow CQC as well as NICE guidelines to ensure objective evaluation and consistent assessment methods.

The facility must develop a team solely responsible for audits and feedback processes.

• Senior nursing staff members should join infection control specialists to perform audits while giving immediate feedback.

• The team assigned for audits must receive proper training which enables them to inspect cleanliness criteria properly while also developing solution-oriented suggestions.

The organization needs to build a clear communication system through which audit reports can be shared.

• Regular distribution of audit results to nursing staff creates both an environment of accountability and ongoing improvement initiatives.

• The organization needs to create an electronic system which will record audit outcomes alongside treatments and performance metrics.

Enhance Staff Awareness and Engagement

• Nursing employees should learn about cleanliness protocols together with their responsibility to set high standards.
• The organization should motivate staff members to maintain accountability levels through a mix of open exchanges and team-based solutions.

The organization should maintain ongoing training sessions which must be accompanied by competency assessment systems.

• Providing regular training sessions about infection control methods along with cleanliness standards helps team members to better practice best safety methods (Minkler et al., 2021).
• The organization should conduct quarterly assessments to verify that healthcare providers maintain both knowledge and competence involving hygiene protocols.

Monitor and Evaluate Progress

• We need to evaluate the punctuality of clean compliance measurements to verify a 95% rate by six months since starting at 80%.

• The organization should change its strategies according to audit results to create sustainable long-term performance enhancements.

References

• Aschroft, M. and Oakeshott, I., 2022. Life support: The state of the NHS in an age of pandemics. Biteback Publishing.
• Dongnadeng, H.A. and Taneerat, W., 2023. A service development model for public hospitals in Thailand characterized by Muslim practices. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 24, pp.53-70.
• Doyle, B., 2023. Sick or Healthy? The Urban North Between the Wars. Northern History, 60(1), pp.94-116.
• Ferguson, D., Harwood, P., Allgar, V., Roy, A., Foster, P., Taylor, M., Moulder, E. and Sharma, H., 2021. The PINS Trial: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing a traditional versus an emollient skincare regimen for the care of pin-sites in patients with circular frames. The Bone & Joint Journal, 103(2), pp.279-285.
• Green, P., 2022. The role of the Royal Air Force Deployed Readiness Preparation Team in the UK. Primary Dental Journal, 11(1), pp.58-65.
• Griffante, A., 2024. For the sake of the children: The Lady Muriel Paget’s Mission to the Baltic States (1920–1922). European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire, 31(4), pp.565-583.
• Main, J., 2022. Ethel Gordon Fenwick: Nursing Reformer and the First Registered Nurse.
• Oakley, A., 2024. Teaching girls about housework. In The Science of Housework (pp. 23-43). Policy Press.
• Oakley, A., 2024. The Science of Housework: The Home and Public Health, 1880-1940. Policy Press.
• Osagwu, M., Okobi, E. and Ekor, E., 2024. Postoperative infections: risk factors, prevention, and management strategies. Int J Med Sci Dent Res, 7, pp.52-76.
• Roberts, A., 2023. Plastic Surgery in Wars, Disasters and Civilian Life: The Memoirs of Professor Anthony Roberts OBE. Frontline Books.
• Wildman, S., 2022. ‘Were they to have petticoat government in the hospital?’The reform of nursing in nineteenth-century Lincoln. Women's History Review, 31(5), pp.741-759.
• Peate, I., 2022. Advanced clinical practice at a glance. John Wiley & Sons.
• Gkouliaveras, V., Kalogiannidis, S., Kalfas, D. and Kontsas, S., 2025. Effects of Climate Change on Health and Health Systems: A Systematic Review of Preparedness, Resilience, and Challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(2), p.232.
• Babikian, C., 2021. “Partnership Not Prejudice”: British Nurses, Colonial Students, and the National Health Service, 1948–1962. Journal of British Studies, 60(1), pp.140-168.
• Chadwick, E., 2023. Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; with Appendices. BoD–Books on Demand.
• Breitnauer, J., 2022. How the Black Death Gave Us the NHS.
• Hilton, C., 2021. Civilian lunatic asylums during the First World War: a study of austerity on London's fringe (p. 294). Springer Nature.
• Downs, M., Blighe, A., Carpenter, R., Feast, A., Froggatt, K., Gordon, S., Hunter, R., Jones, L., Lago, N., McCormack, B. and Marston, L., 2021. A complex intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in nursing homes: a research programme including the BHiRCH-NH pilot cluster RCT. Programme Grants for Applied Research, 9(2), pp.1-200.
• Hussein, M., Pavlova, M. and Groot, W., 2023. An evaluation of the driving and restraining factors affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation standards: a force field analysis. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 16(2), pp.167-175.
• Rahmana, A., Fauzy, M. and Suyono, A.M., 2021. 5 Why Analysis Implementation To Detect Root Cause Of Rejected Product (Study At Aerospace Industry). Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), pp.1691-1695.
• Jiang, L., Sun, X., Ji, C., Kabene, S.M. and Keir, M.Y.A., 2021. PDCA cycle theory based avoidance of nursing staff intravenous drug bacterial infection using degree quantitative evaluation model. Results in Physics, 26, p.104377.