Addressing High Rates Of Missed Appointments In Local Physiotherapy Clinics Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads561
• Pages12
• Words2955

Introduction

Problem Description

No-show rates are a problem within physiotherapy services and have an impact on the provision of care. Research has indicated that any gap in the physiotherapy regime increases the length of time needed to get back to normal, increases the cost of treatment and therapy, and delays recovery and other complications. Estimations have it that in the UK, up to 10% of physiotherapy appointments are missed every year meaning that additional time is thrown away and precious healthcare resource is stretched even further (NHS England, 2024). Patients, on the other hand, experience delays in their programs and care making their quality of life lower and developing more chronic illnesses. Availability of medical appointments is also lost and healthcare providers incur costs as they incur expenses every time, they have empty slots on their schedule and have to incur the cost of rescheduling every time an appointment is missed (Marbouh et al., 2020). Students using assignment help writing can better understand the consequences of no-show rates and the importance of reducing missed appointments to improve healthcare efficiency. This not only affects the individual outcome of a particular patient but also concerns a general disruption of services and is therefore a highly relevant issue.

Background

Skipped sessions are an international concern across healthcare but their impact is more detrimental in physiotherapy because the treatment is sequential and requires patient involvement. Available data from the NHS reveals that out of 307 million scheduled sessions 15.4 million of slots people fail their appointments every year, therefore implying large losses and over-arching inconvenience (NHS England, 2019). Some of these are due to increased inefficiency in communication mechanisms, technical difficulties and forgetfulness of patients further complicating the problem. The issue frustrates the efficiency of unlocking equitable and timely care, which is one of the priority objectives of the Long-Term Plan of the NHS.

Rationale

The QI project in this case will focus on timely follow-up of patients not to attend their appointments through appointment reminders, flexible timelines and better patient enlightenment. The theoretical foundation of this intervention is anchored on the Health Belief Model which suggests that perceived barriers and benefits affect patient behaviour (Hagger et al., 2020). This project removes self-identified barriers to attending appointments for example, people who have issues arranging transport or face other logistical challenges and it focuses on a positive reinforcement of attendance to treatment programmes to increase these rates and hence, enhance patients’ outcomes.

Addressing High Rates Of Missed Appointments In Local Physiotherapy Clinics Assignment Sample

Liked This Sample? Hire Me Now

Douglas Lockwood 8 Years | MSc

Aim

The QI project goal is to enhance patient attendance to physiotherapy sessions by decreasing the rate of missed appointments by at least 20% in 6 months.

Methods

PDSA cycle

This QI plan will follow the PDSA cycle to help lower missed physiotherapy appointments at an NHS clinic (Set, Bailey and Kumar, 2022). The project will involve a structural and cyclical evaluation to determine the impact of different interventions across different periods.

Plan

In this phase, the problem of non-admittance for failure to keep an appointment is analyzed, and particular measures to prevent such occurrences are developed. The team will implement the following interventions:

Appointment Reminders: Patients will also be notified using text or mail a day before their due date for appointments.

Flexible Scheduling:  Other potential benefits for patients comprise new time slots being offered in the case of personal choice of time by the patient.

Patient Education: Messages regarding the value of showing up for physiotherapy appointments and possible repercussions to one’s health if they do not will be shared.

Do

In this phase, the planned interventions will be piloted to a selected sub-sample of the patients who are most likely to miss the appointments. The initiatives will continue to be implemented and their efficacies assessed.

Study

To assess the effectiveness of the interventions the results of intervention strategies will be evaluated after a set period. Some important healthcare activity indicators are several occasions that appointments have not been honoured, satisfaction indicators, and feedback (Lloyd et al., 2023). Analysis of data collected during the study will be done to establish whether the interventions have contributed to the decrease in no-shows.

Act

Alterations to the intervention strategy will be made during the Study phase, in light of the results obtained. Best practices will be introduced for the overall patient population whereas ineffective or suboptimal practices will be modified or dropped.

Data Collection Methods

For missed appointments and patient interactions monitoring the project will also incorporate the clinic’s EHR to determine the scheduled and cancelled physiotherapy sessions (Filipec and Brumini, 2019). Data will be collected over two periods including pre-intervention and post-intervention phases cross-sectional study using two different samples. Further data will be collected by assessing the feedback collected from the patient feedback questionnaires and several responses received from the appointment reminder that will subsequently be evaluated based on the engagement levels. It will also aid in the measurement of the rate of patient’s response to reminders and if they are more responsive to changes in appointment dates.

Data Analysis Methods

Quantitative analysis will be performed in terms of percentage missed appointment rates which will be subjected to statistical tests of difference before and after the intervention (Rana, Gutierrez and Oldroyd, 2021). Quality data will be gathered utilizing questionnaires, which will offer information on the patients’ experience and attitude toward the intervention. Any variations arising from the patients themselves, such as age or socio-economic status, or from external factors such as flu season will be either included or excluded depending on the specific study requirements.

Ethical Considerations

Among ethical issues, the primary concerns will be confidentiality of data and patient consent. Patients will be informed about appointment reminder communications and consent to receive the information will be sought. All patient data will be stripped of any features that will identify the patient, and hence the data collected will not demand any ethical compliance.

Discussion

This quality improvement project is aimed at decreasing the number of no-show patients in physiotherapy inpatients in a hospital environment using several strategies. Some of the main reasons for patients’ failure to attend their appointments are poor patient compliance or inadequate follow-up, and practical issues (Reinhard Busse, 2019). This intervention will address these by ensuring that a reminder in this context through text and email will be well instituted while on the other hand, the option of rescheduling will be an easy tool found in the column. Moreover, with the help of the PDSA, the clinic will observe the effectiveness of these interventions and may alter them when needed (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2023). Met-patient involvement, better communication, and multiple opportunities to reschedule are other strategies that need to help the intervention greatly reduce no-show rates. When implemented in conjunction with enhanced clinic monitoring and processes of the data-driven ongoing improvement of service (Cascini et al., 2021). It holds the capacity to reduce the number of people who fail to show up for their appointments and in the process realise better patient outcomes and organizational productivity.

Introducing efficient rescheduling procedures makes treatment plan appointments less burdensome to attend at a more desired time thus, leaking patient involvement with the health sector. The implementation of PDSA cycles used in this project also allows for a clear organisational structure to guide the learning process and allow changes to be made as and when required to support success. Schwebel and Larimer (2018) have found that such interventions as sending automated text messages, emails or calls can reduce the no-show rate within outpatient clinics and physiotherapy departments. When barriers to rescheduling are removed they need to allow patients more flexibility and enhance the retention level (Liu et al., 2019). However, the special feature of this work is that all these steps are done simultaneously using text and email, rescheduling, and PDSA cycle reminder checks. This places numerous benefits over efforts that are approached from a single perspective or are likely to have limited effectiveness.

The expected outcome of the intervention is high for the patient and the healthcare organisation. From the patient’s perspective, the urge to receive these reminders and the presence of a straightforward option to reschedule will eliminate the stress as well as confusion most patients experience when they realize they have failed to honour their appointments (Dutruel, Hecht and Nadja Kadom, 2023). Patient-assisted navigation will help the patients feel that they are being supported during their treatment, leading to increased compliance with the requirements of the therapy. For physiotherapists, the reduction in the number of missed appointments would mean that many planned appointments will not be missed hence helping in planning of work and other productive work to be done (Fatoye et al., 2023). This will enable the provision of services in efficient and effective progression to include standard patterns, decrease gaps in service and also provide service for newcomers. For interventions from a systems perspective, improved efficiency in a clinic can be accomplished, by voiding extra spending and time lost (Canolle et al., 2022). In equal regard, it will enable the healthcare system as a whole to reap higher benefits due to efficiency and organization brought about by a reduction in several patients who fail to show up for their appointments.

However, a few challenges may hamper the success of the intervention even with the expectation of several positives. The use of additional reminders or having to change appointments might present a problem with the patients refusing to receive more reminders (Woodcock, 2021). The patients may feel pressured or do not know how to use the rescheduling application. Therefore, the intervention may not be as effective as planned (Chung et al., 2019). Furthermore, staff engagement and following up on the developed intervention can be a challenge. The unexpected reason is that if the physiotherapists do not provide rescheduling options in an organized manner or fail to incorporate these new processes into their practice then the intended intervention may not reach its optimum level (Gleadhill et al., 2022). Other practical issues, including technical problems concerning the reminder system or problems in handling requests for rescheduling appointments,s might be a major obstacle to the success of the intervention.

Limitations

However, several limitations can be pointed out for the proposed intervention. One of the most prominent limitations is the external validity of the findings. This research is being conducted in one physiotherapy department in a hospital and findings may not generalize to other clinics or any other health facility. Therefore, patients and organizational characteristics, as well as the local features of singular clinics, such as size or resources, might in some way affect the outcome of this particular intervention. In addition, though the intervention employs best practices supported by research, it lacks provisions for the mitigation of all extraneous variables including the overall health of the patient, economic status, or other environmental factors like access to public transport (Ehrman et al., 2024). Such biases will be minimized by keen observation of contextual variables and modification of the intervention process.

Conclusion

Continued compliance of patients and staff with the reminder procedures together with resource support towards the continuation of the reminder system and rescheduling plans will be determinants of the sustainability of the intervention. As text and email reminders are fairly inexpensive compared to the other components of this intervention and since rescheduling is equally uncomplicated, this intervention could be delivered on a sustained basis. However constant supervision and intervention will be required to retain high efficiency for each of them. The majority of these directives can be applied in other physiotherapy departments or other health care districts es,pecially in out-patient facilities where missed appointments are rife. That is the reason why the proposed approach is suitable to be scaled, and it can be implemented in various contexts, for example, as different specialities or in various healthcare centres dealing with the analogous problems associated with patient attendance. The effectiveness of this particular intervention may lead to the application of these approaches to the entire healthcare system across the board to eliminate missed appointments.

Future Steps

The next step in research may concern itself with the effects of this type of intervention on the patient, including the benefits to be gained from more frequent attendance. Further, the assessment of the durability of the reminder and rescheduling system would be informative for further work on its effectiveness and possibilities for expansion. Similar and future research can also accentuate the specificity of the intervention by considering other communication techniques, or by including the patient’s preferences in treatment to further improve the experience and impact of the approach.

Declaration

I confirm that no software tools, including Generative AI (GAI) applications, were used in the development and completion of this assessment.

References

• Canolle, F., Antonić, D., Nova, A.C., Goncharuk, A., Melo, P., Raposo, V. and Vinot, D. (2022). Advancement of Efficiency Evaluation for Healthcare. Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Person-Centered Healthcare, pp.91–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79353-1_6.
• Cascini, F., Santaroni, F., Lanzetti, R., Failla, G., Gentili, A. and Ricciardi, W. (2021). Developing a data-driven approach in order to improve the safety and quality of patient care. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(9), p.667819. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.667819.
• Chung, S., Martinez, M.C., Frosch, D., Jones, V.G. and Chan, A.S. (2019). Patient-Centric Scheduling Practices: Implementation of Health Information Technology to Improve the Patient Experience and Access to Care (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/16451.
• Dutruel, S.P., Hecht, E.M. and Nadja Kadom (2023). Patient-Centered Radiology Communications: Engaging Patients as Partners. Journal of the American College of Radiology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2023.10.009.
• Ehrman, R.R., Malik, A.N., Haber, B.D., Glassman, S.R., Bowen, C.A., Korzeniewski, S.J., Bauer, S.J. and Sherwin, R.L. (2024). The role of place-based factors and other social determinants of health on adverse post-sepsis outcomes: a review of the literature. Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency Medicine, 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/femer.2024.1357806.
• Fatoye, F., E Afolabi Olubukola, Tadesse Gebrye, Oyewole, O.O., C. Fatoye, Francis Oluwafunso Fasuyi and Chidozie Emmanuel Mbada (2023). Missed Physiotherapy Appointment and Its Influence on Cost, Efficiency and Patients’ Outcomes. PubMed, 36(1), pp.3–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2023.2586.
• Filipec, M. and Brumini, G. (2019). Attitude of physiotherapists toward electronic health record in Croatia. Archives of Physiotherapy, [online] 9(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-019-0062-7.
• Gleadhill, C., Bolsewicz, K., Davidson, S.R.E., Kamper, S.J., Tutty, A., Robson, E., Da Silva, P.V., Donald, B., Dooley, K., Manvell, J., Manvell, N., Delbridge, A. and Williams, C.M. (2022). Physiotherapists’ opinions, barriers, and enablers to providing evidence-based care: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Services Research, [online] 22(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08741-5.
• Hagger, M.S., Cameron, L.D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. and Lintunen, T. (2020). The Handbook of Behavior Change. Cambridge University Press.
• Liu, J., Xie, J., Yang, K.K. and Zheng, Z. (2019). Effects of Rescheduling on Patient No-Show Behavior in Outpatient Clinics. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(4), pp.780–797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0724.
• Lloyd, R., Munro, J., Evans, K., Gaskin-Williams, A., Hui, A., Pearson, M., Slade, M., Kotera, Y., Day, G., Loughlin-Ridley, J., Enston, C. and Rennick-Egglestone, S. (2023). Health service improvement using positive patient feedback: Systematic scoping review. ProQuest, [online] 18(10), p.e0275045. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275045.
• Marbouh, D., Khaleel, I., Al Shanqiti, K., Al Tamimi, M., Simsekler, M.C.E., Ellahham, S., Alibazoglu, D. and Alibazoglu, H. (2020). Evaluating the impact of patient no-shows on service quality. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, [online] 13(13), pp.509–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S232114.
• Melnyk, B. and Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
• NHS England (2019). NHS England» Missed GP appointments costing NHS millions. [online] England.nhs.uk. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/2019/01/missed-gp-appointments-costing-nhs-millions/ [Accessed 13 Jan. 2025].
• NHS England (2024). NHS England» NHS AI expansion to help tackle missed appointments and improve waiting times. [online] www.england.nhs.uk. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/2024/03/nhs-ai-expansion-to-help-tackle-missed-appointments-and-improve-waiting-times/ [Accessed 13 Jan. 2025].
• Rana, J., Gutierrez, P.L. and Oldroyd, J.C. (2021). Quantitative Methods. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, [online] pp.1–6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_460-1.
• Reinhard Busse (2019). Improving healthcare quality in Europe : characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies. Copenhagen: Who Regional Office For Europe.
• Schwebel, F.J. and Larimer, M.E. (2018). Using Text Message Reminders in Health Care services: a Narrative Literature Review. Internet Interventions, [online] 13(13), pp.82–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2018.06.002.
• Set, K.K., Bailey, J. and Kumar, G. (2022). Reduction of the No-Show Rate for New Patients in a Pediatric Neurology Clinic. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.09.001.
• Woodcock, E. (2021). Barriers and Facilitators to Automated Patient Self-Scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/28323.