Leadership PDP & OKR Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads540
• Pages9
• Words2330

Introduction

Leadership is crucial in determining success within an organisation, influencing the development of people, integrating of teams and accomplishing of organizational goals (Cai, 2023). For students seeking help writing assignments on leadership strategies, this analysis provides key frameworks. From the videos presented it is clear that leadership is not only about commanding but about inspiring, and helping people find their meaning and focus within an organization. Managers have to have the right tools to base their assessments and effectively facilitate performance improvement of employees.

This assignment, drawing insights from Lars Sudmann's emphasis on self-leadership and Dave Hallinon's framework of Objectives and Key Results (OKRs), aims to explore two crucial aspects of leadership: assigning staff personal targets for their performance and the use of the Personal Development Plan (PDP). This report demonstrates the relativity of purposeful goals and self-leadership theory by outlining different leadership behaviours and best practising methods.

Selection of a Leader

Dave Hallinon contributes a great deal to the team, including containment of operations and management of responses as a manager at LAS. Cuddyer is also responsible for health protocol matters, organizing fast responses and morale booster during key incidents. An analysis of his performance based on gaps that exist shows that he has several good qualities. Moreover, Dave pays a lot of attention to appropriate interpersonal communication, shows successful leadership in terms of handling emergencies and implementing important decisions swiftly and being a great team player. Nevertheless, they include poor ability in the development of strategic long-term improvements to operations, weak technical skills in data analysis and sub-optimal abilities in assigning tasks during periods other than emergency.

Peer evaluation also supports this evaluation, acknowledging his strong crisis management skills, but identifying areas of significant potential improvement of strategic thinking and delegation methods. The next tool adds to the analysis by offering a broad perspective of his work appraisal received from different subordinates, peers, and supervisors, by means of the 360-degree feedback.

Evaluating Individual Performance

Self-Evaluation

Benchmarked self-appraisal guides leaders such as Dave to assess and evaluate themselves in terms of efficiency and effectiveness on the job as well as the organisation. Most of the recommendations are in line with what Lars Sudmann has proposed on self-leadership and where leaders need to be in a position to critique their decisions and the outcome (Sudmann, 2016). For Dave self-assessment can include how he has managed crises, motivated his workers, and managed the delegation of tasks.

The process corresponds to the Kolb’s (1984) model of experiential learning in which reflection plays a major role. Since Dave can know the openings in his technical competencies such as in data analytics, he can pursue for training to improve those areas. Such an approach ensures that they feel responsible to develop themselves because the whole initiative is organized by themselves.

Structured Frameworks: OKR stands for Objectives and Key Results

John Doerr’ s OKRs makes it easier to create structure and measurable goals to assess Dave’s performance. OKRs, short for Objectives and Key Results, allow for setting goals and measuring results by numerical indicators (Doerr, 2018). For example, goal that Dave may have is increase availability of, and response times for, ambulances in his team; these must have specific measurables like cutting average response time to 15% and planning and adoption of new scheduling systems should not take more than six months.

As boarding Illustrate by Doerr (2018) with Google’s OKRs instance, What’s the goal, shows how well they fit to align personal objectives with organizational objectives. In the case of OKRs, it makes sure that all that Dave does is driven by the mission of LAS to make sure that all that is done is openly and accountably done. Furthermore, by comparing his work to these results, Dave can pinpoint where more effort is needed to get better outcomes.

Performance Gap Analysis

Current Performance

Strengths:

As also visible in the case, Dave proves an outstanding performer on all aspects of team management, including morale, coordination, and common decision making during emergencies. He possesses good skills on interpersonal relations; particularly his ability to deal with instances where he can inform his team that we are pawns in someone else is game.

Gaps:

Thus, development needs to embrace long-term organisational planning, deeper expertise in the use of data analysis tools such as Tableau, ensuring that programme components are delegated throughout organisational functioning, and adequate training in terms of speaking in public and giving presentations.

Skill/Responsibility	Current Proficiency (1-5)	Desired Proficiency (1-5)	Gap	Assessment of Gap	Impact on Role	Priority Level
Strategic Planning	2	5	3	Limited ability to analyze market trends, set long-term goals, and align business strategies with LAS's objectives.	Affects the ability to contribute to long-term business success.	High
Data Analytics (Tableau)	1	4	3	Lacks the ability to analyze data effectively, extract insights, and make data-driven decisions.	Hinders operational efficiency and innovation.	High
Task Delegation	3	5	2	Struggles with distributing tasks efficiently, leading to workload imbalance.	Reduces team efficiency and increases stress levels.	Medium
Public Speaking/Presentation	2	4	2	Lacks confidence in articulating ideas clearly and persuasively to stakeholders.	Limits influence, reduces clarity in communication, and weakens stakeholder engagement.	Medium

Critically Assess Development Vehicles

Coaching/Mentoring: Dave’s development requires invaluable coaching and mentoring. However, coaching focuses on specific problems and gives advice from experienced managers. This makes it more personal so he can get better at his planning and delegation skills. On the other hand, Dave has an opportunity for mentoring to learn from the experiences of the mentor. These two things not only give Dave an accelerator to his professional growth but also speed up his learning and decision-making through shared wisdom and insights. A limitation of the effectiveness of mentoring is that the mentor may not be available or be compatible with Dave’s needs.

Structured Training Programs: Dave’s specialisation in special training courses like spreadsheet Tableau and other analytics tools build up Dave’s technical skills. Later these programmes give a structured learning environment so that there is an overall record of all the important points to be learned. However the first time away from daily operations may cause Dave's workflow to take a pause as well as affect the team dynamic.

On-the-Job Learning: Projects from the launch of LAS’s new ambulance scheduling system to daily operations provide Dave with a forum in which he can immediately teach new knowledge to LAS’s operational needs. This also meets the time-bound and operational requirements of an immediate organization while delivering clear cuts in terms of cost and efficiency. On-the-job learning has the effect of developing practical skills and problem-solving abilities related to LAS's challenges. Though Dave’s progress might be faster without structured programs or external guidance, there could be gaps in his theoretical knowledge that structured training may otherwise help to fill.

Peer Learning Groups: This leads to Case sharing and collective problem-solving. Interdisciplinary exchange is promoted through the use of peer learning groups, and skill development is combined in a cost-effective way. By sharing their experiences and best practices regarding LAS, Dave can receive a range of diversity of perspectives and innovation at resolving common challenges faced within LAS. However, the impact of peer learning groups depends on a willingness to participate and the high quality of interactions among the group members.

Implementing a Personal Development Plan (PDP)

Development Area	Current State	Desired Outcome	Action Plan	Resources Needed	Timeline	Success Indicators
Strategic Planning	Limited strategic foresight.	Develop and implement strategic plans.	Attend a strategic planning workshop and shadow a senior manager.	Workshop materials, mentor availability.	4 months	Submission of a strategic plan aligned with LAS goals.
Data Analytics Skills	Minimal proficiency in Tableau.	Generate accurate data reports.	Complete an online Tableau course and apply learning in monthly reports.	Course access, mentorship from a data analyst.	3 months	Creation of accurate and actionable reports.
Task Delegation	Inconsistent delegation practices.	Confidently delegate effectively.	Observe delegation techniques of a senior manager and implement a framework.	Senior manager mentorship.	5 months	Positive team feedback on task delegation.

Explain Monitoring of the PDP

The activity feedback and periodic review of PDP will apply in the monitoring process to identify progress with the success factors highlighted for Dave. Mentor or line manager weekly meetings will monitor his progress in each of the areas. The objectives as well as the key results will be checked bi-weekly using OKRs as guide on how to monitor. For instance, the objectives adopted with regard to strategic management development for Dave will include developing an outline of the strategic plan as well as submitting the final strategic plan within four months.

Leadership PDP & OKR Assignment Sample

Liked This Sample? Hire Me Now

Mark Brown 3 Years | MSc

Information on improvement on delegation and leadership will be collected through feedback mechanisms including 360-degree feedback where he and his team, colleagues and supervisors will be asked to provide feedback on the improvement. Monthly progress reports on data analytics will be written to identify the use of skills newly learned. : The PDP will be reviewed at least once a year or as and when changes to the job, available resources or specific goals occur and it will reflect the organization’s goals.

Case Study/Example

Review of Current Level of Performance

In the first stage, there is an assessment of the existing skills that Sarah possesses. Sarah’s manager applies the assessment tool known as Gap Analysis to determine how she measures against the needs of the managerial position.

• Absence of good communication skills particularly in presenting ideas to top management (Gamiljj and Rahman, 2021).
• As it is executed to reflect on the subject Self, Lars Sudmann, Sarah is also made to evaluate herself and come up with strengths and weaknesses she may think needs working on. This gives the presumed development beneficiaries a sense of ownership in the development process.

Step 2: Setting Objectives

Sarah’s objectives are set by having a guideline from the OKR model by Dave Hallinon. The objectives are meaningful, and lofty and correlate with a person’s goals and desires as well as with the goals of the company. For example:

Objective 1: Improve the level of time organization to ensure the completion of work according to the set timeline (Cakir and Adiguzel, 2020).

Key Result 1: Meet 95% of targets within the next three month’s work deadlines.

Key Result 2: Perform a time management workshop not later than a month.

Objective 2: Enhance the area of communications and presentations.

Key Result 1: Within the next two months, create one fully developed presentation for senior management.

Key Result 2: Get a minimum of 7/10 in a team feedback poll on the clarity of the communication.

Objective 3: These workers need to build leadership skills in order to undertake delegative authority.

Key Result 1: Request the other team members to handle 30% of her assignments in the succeeding project cycle.

Key Result 2: The senior employee should facilitate two team-building workshops per three months.

Step 3: Develop the Action Plan

Properly to these targets, an extensive activity map is developed. The plan outlines specific actions, resources, and timelines:

Time Management: Sarah participates in a two-day training on time management and uses one of the task list applications (e.g., Asana) to sort her assignments.

Communication: She takes a public speaking class and practices her speeches in front of her teams with feedback from other members during the meetings.

Leadership: Sarah follows a senior manager in an organization to learn how to delegate and then leads group discussions to improve teamwork.

Step 4: Monitoring and Feedback

Sarah's weekly evaluations are conducted biweekly. These meetings are regular, most often involving a focus group, and they are also unobtrusive and flexible regarding the modifications that can be made concerning the PDP (Mishra, 2018).

Conclusion

This paper presents how the use of a personal development plan (PDP) is indeed an effective way for personal development as well as for organizational development. When matched with a self-organizing map, practical goal-setting, and constant feedback, leaders can resolve the workers’ issues, teach them how to get past barriers and assist in fostering their full talents. These have been well illustrated by the strategies shown by Lars Sudmann and Dave Hallinon as shown below. He also points out methods of self and other evaluation, insisting on self-leadership as a key to change. On the other hand, Doerr’s OKR approach provides definitions and quantification to make meaningful development objectives acceptable and useful.

References

• Barauskaite, G. and Streimikiene, D. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance of companies: the Puzzle of concepts, Definitions and Assessment Methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), pp.278–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2048.
• Business Balls (2010). Performance Appraisals - BusinessBalls.com. [online] Businessballs.com. Available at: https://www.businessballs.com/team-management/performance-appraisals/.
• Cai, J. (2023). Effects of Leadership Styles and Organizational Strategy to Enhance Performance Efficiency. Journal of enterprise and business intelligence./Journal of enterprise and business intelligence, 3(1), pp.12–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.53759/5181/jebi202303002.
• Cakir, F.S. and Adiguzel, Z. (2020). Analysis of Leader Effectiveness in Organization and Knowledge Sharing Behavior on Employees and Organization. SAGE Open, [online] 9(4), pp.1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914634.
• Chanana, N. and Sangeeta (2020). Employee engagement practices during COVID‐19 lockdown. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2508.
• Frémeaux, S. and Pavageau, B. (2020). Meaningful Leadership: How Can Leaders Contribute to Meaningful Work? Journal of Management Inquiry, 31(1), p.105649261989712.
• Gamiljj, Y. and Rahman, I.A. (2021). Studying the relationship between causes and effects of poor communication in construction projects using PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Facilities Management, [online] 21(1), pp.102–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-04-2021-0039.
• Hayes, P., Bearman, C. and Gyles, D. (2022). A guide to non-technical skills in emergency management. [online] acquire.cqu.edu.au. CQUniversity. Available at: https://acquire.cqu.edu.au/articles/book/A_guide_to_non-technical_skills_in_emergency_management/21747908.
• Lloyd, J. (2022). Infrastructure Leader’s Guide to Google Cloud. Apress eBooks. Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-8820-7.
• Mishra, L. (2018). Focus Group Discussion in Qualitative Research. TechnoLearn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), pp.1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5223.2016.00001.2.
• Rad, H.S., Alipour, R. and Jafarpour, A. (2023). Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: a case of Wordtune application. Interactive Learning Environments, 5(4), pp.1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170.
• Sergeeva, N. and Kortantamer, D. (2021). Enriching the concept of authentic leadership in project-based organisations through the lens of life-stories and self-identities. International Journal of Project Management, 39(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.001.
• Ullah, Z., Álvarez-Otero, S., Sulaiman, M.A.B.A., Sial, M.S., Ahmad, N., Scholz, M. and Omhand, K. (2021). Achieving Organizational Social Sustainability through Electronic Performance Appraisal Systems: The Moderating Influence of Transformational Leadership. Sustainability, 13(10), p.5611. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105611.
• Zulaikha Al-Saadi, Wafaa Al-Maawali, Ibrahim, H. and Ibtisam Al Rushaidi (2023). The Perceived Affordances and Challenges in the Newly Introduced OKR-Based Performance Appraisal System in an Omani HEI. Springer, 13(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231179632.