MOD009380 International Project Management Execution Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads537
• Pages14
• Words3567

Introduction

Sizewell C project is a new nuclear power generating station planned in the UK with a view of ensuring the enough electricity supply and move away from fossil energy sources. It is, therefore, a mega-project whereby several financial, technological, regulatory, and environmental risks are attached to it. This plan has a full support of both the government of UK and private investors and seeks to produce electricity that is almost carbon friendly for about 6 million homes which would in turn help in decreasing the use of fossil fuels. However, due to its size, scope, and involvement of stakeholder, it also has many execution risk that must also be catered for.

Reference papers and examples support students in understanding structure and advancing academic abilities. We supply help in assignment writing while maintaining full originality. The MOD009380 International Project Management Execution Assignment Sample demonstrates structured analysis, risk evaluation, and schedule feasibility that is intended purely for learning and reference.

This paper critically assesses major parts of the Sizewell C Project with emphasis on the factors such as project scope, risk and schedule. It uses some of the project management theories and method to analyse these challenges and come up with recommendations. This report covers five sources of complexity and one risk factor for the project and an assessment of all aspects of schedule feasibility for the project. Various assumptions have been made wherever necessary and all the assumed facts are clearly mentioned in this part of the report.

Task 1: Project Complexity and Risk Management

Complexity Factors in the Sizewell C Project

Regulatory and Legal Complexity

The construction of the nuclear power station is bound by various national and international regulations of the country. The planning process of the Sizewell C Project is challenging since it has to meet the UK nuclear regulations, environmental legislations, and global safety standards. The OFNR and the EA both impose several cheques that have to be conducted before construction, which results to several contingency measures. Hence, the acquisition of planning permits and consultations prolong the process because most local communities and environmental organisations will resist the project.

MOD009380 International Project Management Execution Assignment Sample

Liked This Sample? Hire Me Now

George Bennett 7 Years | MSc

The theories of project management like stakeholder theory by Freeman (1984) assert that it must be understood that different stakeholders must be managed addressing the need of government agency, environmentalist, and the community (Pereira, Varajão & Takagi, 2022). The challenge comes in the form of balancing of interests of key stakeholders, legal frameworks, and project Phases/periods of project deliverables on the same project. Such delays may result in the approval issues hence leading to high financial risks, time consumption and expensive budgets, therefore the necessity of compliance essentials.

Financial and Budgetary Constraints

More often, mega projects such as the Sizewell C are confronted with financial issues arising from the high level capital outlay. Overall the cost of such a project has been estimated to cost between £20-£30 billion, which will be sourced through grants in aid, private sector, and possible levies to be imposed on consumers (Chee, 2023). There are certain financial risks such as cost control, inflation, variation in interest rate, and government policies which have a direct way of influencing the feasibility of the project.

Traditional cost control methodologies in large projects can be applied through the methods; such as the Earned Value Management that describes the performance by comparing the costs incurred to what was expected. This is because high prices of materials, shortage of labour or emergence of other regulatory requirement may pose a threat to the financial feasibility of the project (Seiß & Bargstädt, 2021). This is why a proper financing strategy, retaining reserve budget, and selection of appropriate investment oil and gas partnerships do matter.

Supply Chain and Logistics Management

So the supply chain of a nuclear power station construction is long and very specific in terms of the equipment and technologies used in the process. Other requirements including, nuclear-grade steel, reactor components as well as the safety systems would have to be sourced from different countries – raising more dependency on suppliers. The result is that such elements as geopolitical risks or owning to the problems in transportation and shortage of skilled workforce which can slow down the project’s schedule.

There are two SCRM models that can be used to address supply risks through the evaluation of possible disruptions and the identification of their corresponding remedies (Louzi et al., 2022). For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the supply chain to (show that even in the best of planning, anything can be disrupted). In essence, Sizewell C Corporation needs to adopt varied sourcing techniques, strategic procurement management, and digitised supply chain to tackle issues of complexity.

Environmental and Social Considerations

The construction of the power plant has generated several controversies regarding its impact on the environment including the wildlife within the area and coastal erosion among others. Critics in this category comprise environment enthusiasts and other stakeholders who often demonstrate against potential hazards of damaging natural living spaces and jeopardising the ecosystems in neighbourhoods around the proposed locations (Oluseye et al., 2023). Furthermore, the deployment incorporates also tremendous land purchase and enhancing the infrastructure which may bring legal issues and social contradiction.

These are important complexities that the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) framework can address in light of exercising proper monitoring and only carrying out the project where key considerations have been made on the impact of the project an environmentally sustainable manner and also on the possibility of achieving the universally agreed sustainable development goals (SDGs) (Amirtash, Jalal & Jelodar, 2021). It is thus advisable for Sizewell C to involve the community through implementing measures such as the launching of conservation programmes including the endowment of biological diversity conservation measures, the integration of renewable energy, and public participation measures. However, behaviour that best addresses the economic goals, on the other hand, has been a difficult task to achieve a more sustainable environment, which is another major challenge that has to be faced.

Technological and Engineering Challenges

Here is a description of Sizewell C project: Sizewell C is a third-generation nuclear power station hence involves the use of some complex nuclear technology and thus would be implemented with high technical input from engineers of the industry. It is worth to say that the nuclear reactors involve a set of design, construction, and proper functioning and they operate within certain safety requirements (Sment & Ho, 2021). Any kind of failure in technology is likely to result in time delay, costs escalation or at the worst outcome, risks to safety.

On the complexity of technology management, there is the Technology Readiness Levels system that cheques the readiness of Technologies for broad application. Since the nuclear power plants include many innovations, digital twin, and even the automated control system, it is essentials that all of the technological parts are adequately tested and approved before implementation. For that matter, training and knowledge management are crucial in avoiding complications related to a shortage of talent and human mistakes.

Risk Identification and Mitigation

Downside Risk Analysis

However, the most apparent social risk which is directly connected with the Sizewell C Project is the disruption of the supply chain due to logistical and technological nature of the project. Since, the major equipments, nuclear grade material, other key components, and workforce are imported and a highly technical knowledge in the construction power reactor is required. Then the project is contingency to be delayed, and the cost may fluctuate, and quality of work could be a serious concern (Aroral, 2021). Another aspect that contributes to this is that geopolitical conditions, trade barriers and means of transport delays the delivery of some materials which could be very essential.

This last one could cause issues like schedule overruns and extra expenditures, as well as the possibility of not meeting the requirements of the regulatory framework. This was particularly evident in the events that led to the nuclear meltdown of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant mostly triggered by nuclear infrastructure delays due to shortages of materials and regulatory issues among other factors. Each of the supply chain elements is highly integrated; therefore, any slight ripple within the supply chain element affects other elements and consequently delays the entire programme.

Risk Rating

The supply chain disruption risk possible can be easily assessed by utilising the Risk Assessment Matrix that is as follows:-

Probability: High – many events that will prompt disruptions are; global supply chain, inflation, and other geopolitical aspects.

Impact: Severe – This is true because large-scale construction projects such as those in the construction industry are very sensible to time horizons as well as cost horizons.

Proximity: Short to Medium Term – These risks may take place when conducting procurement and during construction phases.

Recommended Mitigation Strategies

The following are mitigation measures that should be encouraged by the project team in an effort to reduce the effect of supply chain disruptions:

1. Diversification of Source – pointing to the policy of relying on as many suppliers and particularly from other parts of the globe (Lalmi, Fernandes & Souad, 2021).
2. Inventory Buffering – This is the saving of large stocks of certain resources in order to ensure that the business will not run out in case there are some momentary holds-up.
3. Material Sourcing Efficiency – This is done by making early purchase commitments and making long-term contracts with suppliers.
4. Real-time tracking – By escalating supply chain visibility to provide real-time information to see if there are any risks that can be solved adeptly (Ika & Munro, 2022).
5. Local Supplier Development –This is a policy whereby resources and funds are used to build capacity of domestic suppliers to be relied on rather than the external contacts.

Thus, the measures outlined above have the potential to increase supply chain reliability for Sizewell C in order to minimise dependency risks and carry on with the project in spite of unpredictability.

Task 2: Schedule and Requirements Management

Probability Calculation for Phase 1.5 Completion

Analysis of Gantt chart and Provided Durations

Evaluations associated with the Phase 1.5, Outage Parking and Access are divided into four types of tasks.

1. Excavation and Earthworks (3–5 months)
2. Laydown Area Permeable Paving (2–4 months)
3. Infrastructure Connection (Lighting & Road Markings) (1–3 months)
4. Landscaping (2–3 months)

The best-case scenario has been estimated at 3 months, the worst-case scenario is 4 months and the most conservative case is 5 months and the most pessimistic completion time is 15 months. Hence, estimating from the data recorded above, the most likely time of completion is 11 months (3 months + 3 months + 1 month + 2 months).

To determine the probability of executing Phase 1.5 within 27 months, apply PERT (Programme Evaluation Review Technique).

Probability Calculation Using PERT

PERT estimates project duration using the formula:

TE = (O + 4M + P) / 6

Where:

O = Optimistic duration (8 months)

M = Most likely duration (11 months)

P = Pessimistic duration (15 months)

TE = (8 + 4 (11) + 15) / 6

= 57 / 6

= 9.5 months

The standard deviation (σ) is calculated as:

σ = (P - O) / 6 = (15 - 8) / 6

= 1.17 months

To identify the probability of completing the phase within 27 months, calculate the Z-score:

Z = (X - TE) / σ = (27 - 9.5) / 1.17

 = 17.5 / 1.17

= 14.96

Interpretation

The calculated Z-score is 14.96 which means that the probability of passing Phase 1.5 within 27 months is almost 100%. This indicates that within one year the phase will be very much completed even if there are such delays that may be incurred.

Recommendations on Tender Review

Discussion of Calculated Probability and Implications

The risk assessment for the Phase 1.5 in the Sizewell C Project; Outage Parking and Access paints a picture of quite high probability of success with the project expected to be completed in the cut down 27 months period. If the most pessimists’ option is chosen with the expected completion time of 9.5 months and the standard deviation of 1.17 months, then the project is already within the schedule.

This means that factors that have been known impede development such as delays in procurement of materials, shortages labour and or regulatory constraints will not hugely impact the length of the project. However, even though the likelihood ratios stand high to ensure timely completion, external risks factors for instance; environmental conditions, legal issues, and supply chain have to be put into consideration in the tenders.

From the project management point of view, for example, the probability of the timely completion of the construction is high; therefore, Sizewell C Corporation can work on minimising the costs of the project and ensuring that the project meets high quality levels without having to worry about costly measures that may be required to complete the construction in case the probabilities of several extreme scenarios are actualized (Takagi & Varajão, 2022). This insight can be used in analysing bids prepared by the contractors, and to identify the most appropriate tender from them.

Recommendations for Sizewell C Corporation

As a result of the probability analysis and taking into account considerations of projects risks, the following recommendations for Sizewell C Corporation while reviewing tenders are made:

1. Prioritizing Cost-Effectiveness without Compromising Quality

However, based on the analysis of the probability of meeting the deadline, it is evident that it is high enough therefore the emphasis should be placed on the aspect of value for the money paid. Hence, contractors who give a keen price, technical creativity in construction and cost-effective use of resources should be awarded premium consideration. Nonetheless, the lowest bids should be evaluated to cheque for compliance with requirements of quality delivery and regulatory compliances.

2. Requiring the Contractor to Have Reliability and Issue-Freedom Record

Of the identified risks, timing risks seem least probable despite the need for the best contractors, who have dealt with nuclear infrastructure projects in the past. First, Sizewell C should assess the companies’ past work experience, contractor risk, and credibility, and financial status (Kaufmann & Kock, 2022). Companies who are known to have performed poorly in recent past such as being the contractors who have a history of taking a lot of time to complete their projects, contractors who have had safety issues and have had budget overruns should be avoided.

3. Contract Structuring with Performance-Based Incentives

To ensure that the company does not experience any risk that had not been foreseen in the contract, there should be provision of bonus and penalty that is based on achievement of performance. Proper incentives such as bonuses for early completion and sanctions such as penalties to be incurred in cases where such schedules are revised sharply upward will also help in avoiding complacency and contractor-induced crisis. This it helps in ensuring that the contractors do not relent on the quality of work or time expected from them.

4. Risk Diversification through Multiple Contractors

Sizewell C construction should replicate this approach by selecting several firms to execute the planned at various phases of construction. This experience is useful in diversifying the company’s supply, and it helps it in avoiding risks such as contractor malpractice, strikes or shortages in the supply chain. An appropriate and meaningful division of responsibilities between, the outsourcing contractor and the contracting party will enhance project sustainability.

Task 3: Presentation and Professionalism

Living up to the chosen and developed tone, being professional in the writing and presentation of the report and making sure that all of the involved parts fit together well. A good consultancy report is important in the communication process when presenting findings made during the conduct of a given company’s project. Consequently, the presentation has to reflect a top tier consultancy company due to the high-stakes of the Sizewell C Project in terms of the flow of the presentation if not the accuracy and graphic layout.

Professional Presentation of Information

The report embraces the use of formal language, heading and sub-heading as well as, arrangement of ideas to enhance understanding by the stakeholders. Technical data and probability estimation with risk analysis can be backed with the help of various theories and methods, so the decisions are theoretically grounded (Narayanan & Huemann, 2021). Moreover, brief writing, division into sections, as well as authors’ general conclusions also play the role of maintaining clarity.

Visual Aids and Data Representation

As project management is based on numerical and strategic analysis, charts, Gantt diagrams, risk matrices, and probability models should be used in effective communication of project statistics. It also helps in simplifying key findings to non-technical personnel so that they can help in the decision making process.

Cohesion and Logical Flow

To elaborate, it can be stated that each part of the given report is closely connected to one another, and all of them contribute to the creation of a rather coherent story. For instance, the project complexity comes up due to risk identification then leads into the probability assessment with the merits of tenders. It is a smooth way of interconnecting topics and makes it easier to grasp different aspects of a project, both the problem and the solution aspect.

Conclusion

Thus, by achieving the clarity, structure, and professionalism standards of getting the message across the consultancy report is presented as well-developed, evidence-based, and visually appealing to the audiences of Sizewell C Corporation and other key stakeholders.

Conclusion and Final Recommendations

The Sizewell C project is characterised as a megaproject that enters a heavily regulated environment and faces risks associated with management of many different issues such as, regulatory, financial, and, logistical, as well as the challenge of environment and technology. The downside risk include supply chain disruption as a result of material dependency from global sources, conflict, and delay in acquiring components.In assessing the probability for Phase 1.5,there is a very high chance of completion on time demonstrating that the schedule of the project was feasible.

The report also stressed the professional, clear and well-structured documentation to aid decision making and leadership in projects.

Final Recommendations for Project Execution

It is important that these strategies should be followed to guarantee success of the Sizewell C Project and are as follows:

Licencing and Publics – Take time to engage the relevant regulators, environmentalists and other stakeholders with a view of ensuring that there is an easier approval process and minimal opposition to the company’s projects (Ribeiro, Amaral & Barros, 2021).

Effective financial and cost management measures should also be taken by use of Earned Value Management (EVM) and contingency budgeting to avoid costs overruns.

Supply Chain Resilience- Some recommendations that may be made include deciding on multiple suppliers to work with, having a set of materials that could be stockpiled in case of a disruption of supply and the use of artificial intelligence to constantly monitor the supply chain for any disruptions.

Cost Plus – The method of choosing contractors who provide quality services with definite strategies of minimising risks instead of hiring contractors based on the price they offer their services at.

Driven Project Tracking – Accomplish effective project tracking, avoid scheduling problems, through the use of BIM and Digital Twin technologies (Barbosa et al., 2021).

Risk and Performance Audits – The project should regularly include the risk performance evaluations, safety inspections and other checkups in order to predict the potential issues for the given project in the long term.

Through these, the following recommendations will help Sizewell C Corporation improve the ability to manage future projects and complete them successfully and on time.

Reference List

Journals

• Amirtash, P., Parchami Jalal, M. and Jelodar, M.B., 2021. Integration of project management services for International Engineering, Procurement and Construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), pp.330-349.
• Aroral, H.K., 2021. Waterfall process operations in the fast-paced world: project management exploratory analysis. International Journal of Applied Business and Management Studies, 6(1), pp.91-99.
• Barbosa, A.P.F.P.L., Salerno, M.S., de Souza Nascimento, P.T., Albala, A., Maranzato, F.P. and Tamoschus, D., 2021. Configurations of project management practices to enhance the performance of open innovation R&D projects. International Journal of Project Management, 39(2), pp.128-138.
• Chee, C.K., 2023. Modern Project Management for Successful Execution of Investment Strategy. In Strategic Management and International Business Policies for Maintaining Competitive Advantage (pp. 76-104). IGI Global.
• Ika, L.A. and Munro, L.T., 2022. Tackling grand challenges with projects: Five insights and a research agenda for project management theory and practice. International Journal of Project Management, 40(6), pp.601-607.
• Kaufmann, C. and Kock, A., 2022. Does project management matter? The relationship between project management effort, complexity, and profitability. International Journal of Project Management, 40(6), pp.624-633.
• Lalmi, A., Fernandes, G. and Souad, S.B., 2021. A conceptual hybrid project management model for construction projects. Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp.921-930.
• Lalmi, A., Fernandes, G. and Souad, S.B., 2021. A conceptual hybrid project management model for construction projects. Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp.921-930.
• Louzi, N., Alzoubi, H.M., Alshurideh, M.T., Ghazal, T.M. and Kukunuru, S., 2022. Psychological & Prototypical Model of Execution Management evaluation for the framework Development. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 5(SpecialIssue2), pp.216-223.
• Mohamed, A.M., 2023. Resource Management and Project Execution (Kampala International University).
• Narayanan, V.K. and Huemann, M., 2021. Engaging the organizational field: The case of project practices in a construction firm to contribute to an emerging economy. International journal of project management, 39(5), pp.449-462.
• Oluseye, O., Binga, B., Ehis, O.G. and Aigbavboa, C., 2023. Effect of anti-corruption systems' logic on corruption manifestations in project planning and execution in Nigeria. Construction Economics and Building, 23(3/4), pp.186-207.
• Pereira, J., Varajão, J. and Takagi, N., 2022. Evaluation of information systems project success–Insights from practitioners. Information Systems Management, 39(2), pp.138-155.
• Ribeiro, A., Amaral, A. and Barros, T., 2021. Project Manager Competencies in the context of the Industry 4.0. Procedia computer science, 181, pp.803-810.
• Seiß, S. and Bargstädt, H.J., 2021. Requirements analysis for a project-related quality management system in the construction execution. In ECPPM 2021-eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (pp. 200-208). CRC Press.
• Shayan, S., Pyung Kim, K. and Tam, V.W., 2022. Critical success factor analysis for effective risk management at the execution stage of a construction project. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(3), pp.379-386.
• Sment, J.N.I. and Ho, C.K., 2021. G3P3 Phase 3 Project Execution Plan. Issue 1 (No. SAND-2021-0151). Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM.
• Takagi, N. and Varajão, J., 2022. ISO 21500 and success management: an integrated model for project management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(2), pp.408-427.