Get free samples written by our Top-Notch subject experts for taking online Assignment Help services.
Amazon crisis: Inaction is not an option
With 2019 being a devastating year for Amazon, we have already been quite late to look back on this catastrophe, though being late is better than never. With each hectare of lungs of the earth, Amazon is destroyed, which accelerates rainforests closer to collapse. Though its flames have stopped by 2019, its tears tend not to stop among its biodiversity, starting from killing wildlife, destroying local communities and indigenous people, and not to forget worsened climate change.
Deforestation in Amazon has been increasing at a speed of light with 2021 witnessing the highest catastrophe in last 15 years, having a surge of 22% of deforestation as compared to 2020. Ironically enough, the more cataclysmic this rainforest of Amazon becomes the lower responses it is obtaining from us, and hence, surpassing its tragic boundary. However, we seem to forget that the more trees are torn down, the higher oxygen-starved this planet will be. Serious concerns are noticed considering spread of fires in Amazon, which has not failed to threaten its very existence as the largest tropical forest. It has devastated 500 indigenous people along with homelessness to 34 million people and thousands of plants and animals. This is where relevance of our answers comes forth, as, Do we want muted speakers to lose their homes?
Amazon unquestionably plays a pivotal role in climate regulations in South America. On one hand, it stimulates rainfall regime of this particular region, while on the other hand, Amazon fire pushes spider-web-like biodiversity to the edge of a cliff. Even after coming in contact with walls, dejection reaches its height with Europe being shy away from its responsibility. With no cogent legislation to put an end to products related to deforestation in the EU market, only exhibits its inaction, which definitely is not an option anymore. Affected Amazon will be more vulnerable to concerns, such as floods, droughts, and others leading to this Earth becoming no more a conducive place to live. Hence, biodiversity is a key to living in glee.
Remembering Amazon’s significance, it is a call for governments to act for this forest with proposed bills to stop deforestation-driven products. The government’s promise can be a formal ally against catastrophic climate. It cannot be denied that the loss of Amazon is a loss of our fight against climate change. Nevertheless, one must not forget that with every little action comes a reaction, and hence, remembering Amazon’s once again thriving, all can be a part of solution. Together we, of course, can make a difference, which will facilitate living rights on this planet. Whether it is calling for federal governments, who have been idle for quite some time, to stand for biodiversity, or standing with local communities in these challenging times, and simply spreading words - Amazon crisis needs our actions.
People’s being a part of change is what Amazon demands. Our commitments towards conservation through refraining from unsustainable practices, supporting indigenous people have become more significant now than ever. Even little steps of exempting from consumption of soy, timber, beef, and more can break our active connection with destruction. If we do not move soon, end is near.
This editorial is a brief text, which is intended to persuade a sceptical audience, who is not aware of increasing concerns of climate change, which is fuelled by devastations prevailing in Amazon. Remembering a recent tragic occurrence of Amazon fire, this editorial piece has been a call for the Government’s actions along with all the green panthers’ attentions across economies concerning conservation of biodiversity. By using various examples of measures with regard to one’s actions, this piece tries to convince readers about their small actions can protect ecosystem for everyone’s good.
I have used a number of jargons, such as ‘close to collapse’ and ‘living in glee’ that can be facilitated biodiversity, to engage audiences regarding devastations taking place in Amazon, which is driving future of this planet astray. Inclusion of facts concerning Amazon fire, increase in deforestations, and destruction of biodiversity is intended to build trust among audience, who are not aware of this cataclysmic situation. According to Thompson (2020), synthetic personalisation is considered a rhetoric device, which can raise emotions of an audience, and thus, persuasive power of digital storytelling can be fortified. I have incorporated synthetic personalisation throughout my editorial by using ‘our’ and ‘we’, to foster a collective comfort zone between authors and readers. Thus, conveying a message of concern related to destruction driven by increasing deforestation in Amazon, resulting in tragic biodiversity could be easy to rouse emotions on a personal level. Moreover, I found that my intention to call for even small acts for every tree-hugger could be conveyed more effectively with an integration of synthetic personalisation.
Apart from literary tools, I have emphasised biodiversity by using similes, where I have connected biodiversity to ‘spider-web’, which becomes weak while breaks. Parmonovna (2021) opined that similes in language could engage native readers by conveying a deeper meaning to reach actual intention of a piece. It implies that our inactions along with Governments being shy away from their responsibilities in wake of Amazon fire and rising deforestations largely contribute to collapse of lives as well as this earth. Use of a handful of alliterations is placed to exhibit a lower formal air throughout this piece, and thus, assists to allow a wider scope for deeper communication and thinking. For instance, alliterations, such as ‘closer to collapse’, ‘trees are torn down’ reflect levels of catastrophe, while ‘ally against catastrophic climate’ sheds light on actions with regard to Government, which can be saviour.
According to Dehé and Braun (2020), information-seeking questions demand direct answers, whereas rhetorical questions allow one to imply meaning, which goes beyond literal. In order to retain some pragmatism, I have incorporated a rhetorical question, which can play a significant role in emotional expressions of readers, who will try to connect by answering the question, ‘Do we want muted speakers to lose their homes?’. Rhetorical questions, indeed, do not need any answers, and hence, I wanted to implant a seed of concerns regarding devastations in Amazon in readers’ minds. Along with that, use of quantifiers, such as ‘all can be a part of solution’ mirrors a generalisation of a mass audience. Thereby, intention of this editorial to call for everyone’s actions to conserve nature by taking part even in small acts can be conveyed effectively as well as exponentially. This strategy can be influential enough in improvement of the climate system along with improvement of knowledge for audience about climate.
Textuality of this piece can be arguably persuasive, considering language chosen not only to deliver information but also to place value on information and opinion that are clearly inferred. This inference creates issue in maintaining proper strategy for gathering opinion from others. Most importantly, considering grievousness and severity of rising deforestations in Amazon rainforest, which has been contributing to collapse of biodiversity, I have used metaphors, such as ‘speed of light’ to invoke emotions of readers. Furthermore, I find that use of these phrases can allow a mass audience to connect better, while application of symbols, such as ‘edge of a cliff’ assists to delve deep than a surface of literary meaning. According to Nurova (2021), signs and symbols reflect standards of language, while language analogies, such as metaphors are a linguistic expression, which can relate to emotions of readers. Thus, I believe that use of these linguistic tools throughout my editorial piece enables readers a wider spectrum for logical and rational thinking concerning the Amazon crisis.
Remembering the fact that this brief piece would be featured in a magazine or newspaper, audiences coming from distinct backgrounds can have varied perspectives. Hence, I think a good grasp of actual concern is to be conveyed, as only then one’s intention can be shaped towards sustainable practices, and not to become a part of destruction. Parallelism is about not only repeating words or phrases, but also sheds light on meaning residing throughout a literary piece (Amjad et al. 2020). Therefore, I used parallelism in the very second paragraph to fortify a comprehensible understanding among readers regarding what awaits us if we do not act now towards conservation of Amazon rainforests. By connecting deforestation with an oxygen-starved planet, a reader can readily grasp severity of this devastation.
I have ended my piece with an Aristotelian appeal of pathos, which is intended to use emotions of readers to persuade them. According to Goldin (2020), ethos, logos, and pathos work together as integrated components of a single rhetoric argument or speech. For instance, logos are already dispersed throughout my piece. For this, I have not only relied on statistical data, such as an increasing rate of deforestation in Amazon but also incorporated destructions extended to indigenous people and local community along with animals of this region. I have concluded my editorial with use of pathos, which is intended to evoke emotional expressions and invoke a sense of repulse. This is where I find that my call for action in response to Amazon crisis becomes justifiable, as loss of Amazon rainforests due to our inactions, surely pushes the end of this planet closer.
Amjad, M., Ajmal, M., Rubab, I. and Naseer, A., 2020. Teaching English Poetry through Parallelism and Deviation for Improving Students’ Interpretative Skills. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(13), pp.2077-2090.
Dehé, N. and Braun, B., 2020. The prosody of rhetorical questions in English. English Language & Linguistics, 24(4), pp.607-635.
Goldin, O., 2020. Pistis, Persuasion, and Logos in Aristotle. Elenchos, 41(1), pp.49-70.
Nurova, U.Y., 2021. The Emergence and Development of Ethnolinguistics. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 8.
Parmonovna, N.I., 2021. The Art of Translating Similes in the Works of Central Asian Writers. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(2), pp.1230-1235.
Thompson, R., 2020. English language and multimodal narrative. In The Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities (pp. 456-471). Routledge.
Wwf.eu, 2019. The Amazon is burning. Europe must not shy away from its responsibility. Viewed on 28/01/2022 <https://www.wwf.eu/?351991/WWF-statement-on-devastating-forest-fires-in-the-Amazon>
Wwf.org.uk, 2022. 5 THINGS YOU CAN DO TO HELP THE AMAZON RAINFOREST. Viewed on 28/01/2022 <https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/ways-help-amazon-rainforest>
Get Better Grades In Every Subject
Submit Your Assignments On Time
Trust Academic Experts Based in UK
Your Privacy is Our Topmost Concern
offer valid for limited time only*
