Sepsis Due to Soft Tissue Cellulitis Adults Case Study

• Type Case Study
• Downloads573
• Pages17
• Words4169

Discussion on Sepsis

Sepsis is a clinical syndrome that involves a failure of various organs in the body due to the body’s abnormal response to infection (Sun et al., 2021). This occurs when the immune system of the body is activated to defend the body against disease and in the process activates the inflammatory system throughout the body. It is a universal inflammation process that can cause tissue and organ dysfunction and death if not diagnosed and managed on time, making it a critical topic often discussed in medical Assignment Help resources.

Pathophysiology

Sepsis is a process induced by an organism’s response to an infection and is characterised by a disordered immune response. The organism’s body becomes aware of the presence of an infectious agent and mobilises defences against it (Gyawali, Ramakrishna and Dhamoon, 2019). This immune response is normally seen in our body’s defense against pathogens but in sepsis, the body response is out of control. There is an increase in the production of proteins that trigger inflammation thus causing inflammation in most body tissues (Jarczak, Kluge and Nierhaus, 2021). On the other hand, anti-inflammatory mechanisms are initiated simultaneously and this leads to an issue where one extreme is worsened by the even extreme of the other process. This dysregulation results in increased vascular permeability and hypotension further accompanied by decreased tissue oxygenation and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (Sygitowicz and Sitkiewicz, 2020). The consequence of this damage is a state of shock when organs become non-functioning because of insufficient energy supply.

Epidemiology

Sepsis is by far one of the critical health complications, which affect a large population of people across the globe annually. This is one of the many diseases that claim many lives in hospitals across the world (Garg et al., 2022). Sepsis is most likely to affect old people, babies and people who have weak immune systems, but it is not restricted to them (Abe et al., 2020). Sepsis is relatively more common in developed nations due to the growing tendency of people to develop chronic diseases such as diabetes, obesity, and cancer, as well as due to the ageing population.

Sepsis Due to Soft Tissue Cellulitis Adults Case Study

Liked This Case Study? Hire Me Now

Daniela Marchant 5 Years | MSc

Risk Factors and Possible Causes

Sepsis may arise from any type of infection and can be bacterial, viral, fungal or parasitic in origin. Starting from middle age, are more at risk of developing this condition. Risk factors include obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (Lindström et al., 2021). Reduced appetite and depression may have potential negative impacts on the immune system. Any skin infection such as cellulitis has the potential to result in sepsis if the bacteria get into the bloodstream.

Deterioration if Left Untreated

Sepsis when not well managed is likely to develop into septic shock, which implies hypotension that persists despite fluid inflow and results in poor tissue oxygenation and end-organ dysfunction. This condition may escalate to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) the failure of several organs including the lungs, kidneys, and liver (Raymond et al., 2023). This is normally a very serious condition and in most cases cannot be reversed and leads to the death of the patient. The key to the enhancement of the rate of survival is early diagnosis and management, including the use of antibiotics, fluids, and support in an intensive care unit.

2.1 Assessment and Planning of Nursing Care for Mr. Clarke

2.1.1 Initial assessment utilizing ABCDE approach

A methodical strategy to evaluate and treat individuals with acute illness is offered by the ABCDE approach. This method is essential for determining and treating the extent of Mr Clarke’s sepsis.

Evaluation of airways

First, make sure the airway of Mr Clarke is free and unobstructed. Since his response to voice, it is likely that his airway is patent. Make sure he can independently keep his airway open and be ready to help with airway care in case required.

Evaluation of breathing

With a respiratory rate of 28 breaths/minute, Mr Clarke may be experiencing respiratory distress. 90% saturation in oxygen is less than the typical range of 94% to 98%. Keep a regular eye on the respiratory condition of Mr clerk along with modifying his oxygen therapy to keep his saturation level at a healthy range.

Evaluation of circulation

Mr Clarke has hypotension that is 89/46 mmHg blood pressure and tachycardia (115 bpm heart rate). These results imply impaired circulation most likely as a result of hypervolemia and vasodilation brought on by sepsis. Resuscitation of Intravenous fluid is one of the immediate therapies used to treat hypotension and improve tissue perfusion. Regularly check heart rate along with body pressure to assess treatment response and modify fluid therapy as necessary (Sosnowski et al., 2022).

Evaluation of disability

The fact that responses of Mr Clarke to voice signal is that his degree of consciousness has to be watched. Assessing the score of GCS (Glasgow coma scale) Mr Clarke is required along with looking for any transformation within his neurological condition. Keep an eye out for symptoms of altered mental condition or disorientation as these could be signals of consequences like septic encephalopathy or increasing sepsis (Namgung et al., 2022).

Exposure to the source of the infection

Look for any indication of growing cellulitis like high swelling necrosis or redness on the left thigh of Mr Clarke which is the infection site. For treatment to be effective, the infection source must be located. In order to verify that entire possible infection sources are identified in the treatment plant and to lead targeted treatments of antibiotic therapy get cultures for the diseased area (Wright et al., 2020).

By utilizing this ABCD initiative for the initial assessment a comprehensive assessment of the condition of Mr Clarke is ensured facilitating early and appropriate actions.

2.1.2 Addressing Mr Clarke's preferences and needs

In order to customize care for Mr Clarke, a comprehensive strategy that takes into account his medical background, personal preferences and emotional well-being must be used. Given that sepsis may trigger variations in the level of blood glucose, type-2 diabetes Mr Clarke necessitates close monitoring. His current pressure including his depression symptoms and Mr Clarke’s wife's illness emphasize the requirement of receiving psychological help and perhaps seeking the assistance of Mental Health professionals. It is important to honour the desire of Mr Clerk to stay involved in life and his close relationship with his wife by providing frequent updates on her health and in case feasible, permitting him to speak with her. His diminished appetite means that he needs nutritional aid which working with a dietitian would assist with (Evans et al., 2021). All things considered, Mr Clerk should receive patient-centred care that respects his views and preferences while seeing to his emotional and physical requirements.

2.2 Implementation of Nursing Care

The main objective is to handle sepsis and stop future deterioration based on the result of the evaluation. The goals of the effective care plan ought to be to stabilize the vital symptoms of Mr Clerke, manage the infection along lessen sepsis’s systemic effects. The first thing to do is start sepsis procedures which involve giving oxygen therapy, broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluid resuscitation, all the while constantly evaluating his reaction to treatment.

Moreover, Mr Clarke needs to have his type-2 diabetes closely monitored in order to prevent complications such as hyperglycemia that can exacerbate the consequences of sepsis. Maintaining glycemic control requires routine insulin administration and blood glucose testing. In addition, Mr Clarke's complete recovery depends on treating his depression. Encouraging him psychologically and even enlisting the aid of a Mental Health specialist can enhance his emotional health and level of participation in his treatment.

2.3 Evaluation of Nursing Interventions

Applying pharmacological interventions

Broad-spectrum antibiotics need to be provided after detecting the sepsis to treat the underlying illness. Antibiotic selection needs to be governed by regional guidelines and modified in response to cultural outcomes. In order to lower septic socks risk and associated consequences prompt administration is essential.

It is imperative to monitor the level of blood glucose of Mr Clarke, particularly in light of the stress reaction linked to sepsis. By giving insulin in accordance with a procedure of slide scale, blood glucose can be kept below the desired range producing the risk of complications from hyperglycemia and improving sepsis results (Seok, Jeon and Park, 2020).

Moreover, IV fluids need to be provided to Mr Clerke to increase tissue perfusion and restore his circulating volume to address his hypotension. His urine production and blood pressure will be monitored and in case the hypotension does not go away the fluid therapy will be adjusted and a vasopressor may be required (Seccombe, 2022).

Applying non-pharmacological intervention

It is necessary to give Mr Clerke more oxygen to keep his saturation level within the usual range as of his inadequate saturation level of oxygen. It is crucial to continuously monitor the saturation level of oxygen to evaluate the therapy’s performance and modify the administration of oxygen as necessary.

Additionally in order to make sure Mr Clarke gets appropriate energy as per his requirement for recuperation, nutritional supplementation is crucial. It may be necessary to consult a dietician for specialized guidance, especially with regard to treating his diabetes (Echevarria et al., 2021). Patient awareness can assist Mr Clerke to take care of his health after discharge by emphasizing the medication adherence value, identifying sepsis symptoms and making lifestyle changes.

2.4 Reevaluation and Ongoing Care Adjustments

Continuous assessment and assessment are necessary for significant nursing care to make sure that interventions are tailored to the changing requirements of patients. Sufficient monitoring is necessary to detect early symptoms of patient deterioration and assess the performance of treatment initiatives. It is also important to continuously observe the essential and vital symptoms of Mr. Clerke including his BP, saturation level of oxygen, temperature respiratory rate and heart rate in order to crack his development and his response to the treatment. Safety signs including CRP level and WBC must also be observed to gauge the degree of the body’s response to infection and therapy (Bleakley and Cole, 2020).

Evaluating Mr Clarke's response to the effective treatment incorporates determining the stabilization of his health as a measuring result including antibiotic treatment, resuscitation of fluid and oxygen administration. In case there is a positive reply showing that the existing treatment strategy is functioning his essential symptoms will get better and his symptoms of sepsis will go down. In the event that nothing improves or in case the situation worsens significant strategies need to be improved. This could in tales altering the treatment of antibiotics by considering cultural results or high fluid resuscitation in the treatment of persistent hypertension (Barrett, 2020). In order to provide the patient with significant care Mr clake’s care must be re-evaluated utilizing input provided by the MDT group, which is made up of experts with knowledge of Mental Health challenges diabetes care and infectious diseases who can provide shrewd analysis and suggest modifications to the strategy of care. Revising Mr Clarke's specific requirements allows for a significant initiative for his care particularly in relation to the challenges of Mental Health that he going through with continuous control of sepsis and diabetes (Driessen et al., 2020). Continuous meetings with the MDT group and significant communication initiatives are crucial to ensuring that interventions are consistently in accordance with Mr Clarke’s situation while supplying satisfactory results.

2.5 Identify medications administered for acute physical health issues

Safe and secure medication delivery is crucial to Mr Clarke, particularly in light of his comorbidities and complex disease. Compliance with safety protocols as well as drug administration guidelines is crucial to minimize errors while improving treatment performance. This consists of adhering strictly to the pharmaceutical administration’s five rights which are the right dose, right patient, right route, right time and right drug to reduce hazards.

It takes care to manage possible side effects particularly when giving insulin and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Antibiotics might result in allergic responses or gastrointestinal problems while the therapy through insulin requires close monitoring of the level of blood glucose to prevent hypoglycemia. Mr Clerke has to be taught by nurses how to identify these adverse influences and when to get care (Bos et al., 2023).

It is necessary to routinely examine and record the prescription regime of Mr Clarke along with cross-reference it with any other therapy he could be getting in order to ensure adherence to safe medicine standards. When it comes to treating polypharmacy in individuals who have several chronic illnesses this is very crucial (Martínez et al., 2020). In order to minimize negative drug interactions while promoting patients' health and safety, significant communication is required with MDT for care coordination and guarantees that all group members have enough awareness about the patient's medication plan.

Identification of the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) for Mr. Clarke

The members of the multidisciplinary team, involved in the management of Mr. Clarke are the physicians, the nurses, the wound care specialist, the pharmacist, the dietician the social worker and the psychologist. While being admitted, the team will properly address and treat his sepsis or a high possibility of having sepsis, diabetes, issues with nutrition, and active mental illness. Before discharge, the MDT will re-evaluate him about recovery and risks for complications.

Communication that occurs amongst members of the MDT must be efficient. The requirement of meeting as well as comprehensive and laconic documentation guarantees that all participants have the same understanding of the further work (MacMillan et al., 2019). Some tools that can be helpful for efficient and structured communication include, for instance, SBAR tools that include the following; Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (CDC, 2024). It is also necessary to maintain communication with Mr. Clarke and his family members. Explaining his ailment, and the plans intended for his treatment and allaying every fear they may develop makes them trust both the physician and play an active role in his treatment.

Communication Strategies with the MDT

There are different ways through which interprofessional working can be enhanced and one of these is through Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) working and for that to be effective communication needs to be fostered. In the case of Mr. Clarke who suffers from sepsis, diabetes, and depression, developing straightforward and organized communication is crucial in the involvement of different caregivers.

Among the tools used for promoting efficient professional communication, the roles of the interdisciplinary team and the application of the SBAR communication model should be mentioned (Shahid and Thomas, 2018). SBAR gives out information in an orderly and concise manner without the complex information being passed on to the listener (Müller et al., 2018). When talking to the MDT regarding the condition of Mr. Clarke, SBAR makes sure that all members hear and comprehend the information in the same way. For example, when giving an update to the team on the condition of Mr. Clarke, the SBAR tool assists in passing on the signal, the narrative, the current findings and the plan.

Another important approach is the holding of regular MDT meetings. These meetings should be held regularly especially when there are important developments of Mr.Clarkes’ condition for instance during admission and before discharge (Taberna, 2020). In these meetings everybody can present what he observed, what concerns him and what ideas he has. This approach helps meet all the care needs of the patient, from the sepsis treatment process to psychological health (Lamprell et al., 2019). To reach such an environment each member’s opinion must be important and taken into account.

Communication with the Patient

Communication with Mr. Clarke is also very significant as of those within the MDT. From this perspective, communication should be understandable, empathetic, and patient-oriented. It is necessary to determine the consciousness and awareness of the patient about his disease and the process of its treatment. His capacity to assimilate information may also be affected due to dizziness and weakness so clarification should be clear and concise (Tetsuya Yumoto et al., 2024). This means that the use of medical terms should be minimized or when they are to be used they ought to be explained with a lot of accompanying detail. It is important to always follow up with Mr. Clarke, especially in his understanding of the information that was given.

Because of Mr. Clarke's depressed state, and recent living changes that include his wife’s transfer to a nursing home, one needs to consider a compassionate approach to communication. Another is that of Mr Clarke and his active involvement in the process of decision-making. Regardless of this, he should be helped to make decisions in areas of his health sector insofar as he is capable. This includes the choice of treatment, the possible consequences on his health and quality of life, the concordance with his decision and his beliefs.

Engagement with the Family/Caregivers

Working with Mr. Clarke’s family, especially his son Jason, is an important principle of interprofessional relations. Mr. Clarke also, as the next of kin of Jason, can help his father during and after the rehabilitation process and if necessary can make some decisions on Mr. Clarke’s behalf because of his state. It is important to remain open and honest when dealing with the family in this case Jason (Soukup et al., 2023). He should be, on a routine basis, informed about his father’s status, the ongoing treatment and management methods. These updates should be given in simple terms and in such a way that Jason will comprehend the circumstances (Soukup et al., 2023). There is no need to use complicated or medical terminology as was the case with Mr. Clarke, and one should always ensure that they understand before proceeding.

It is also imperative that Jason be engaged with care planning. This is done by explaining to Mr. Clarke his preference and ensuring that Jason has expressed an opportunity to raise his worries and observations. For instance, Jason, being close to his father, may observe shifts in the father’s emotional state or motor skills that the MDT did not know about and such information is vital in the management process. It also means that more attention should be paid to Jason’s emotional needs as a patient (Wihl et al., 2021). In this case, stress arises since taking care of a dear one suffering from a severe disease is overwhelmingly tasking. Before discharge, the healthcare team should recognize that Jason might be experiencing stress and is likely to refer him to counselling services or support groups.

Documentation of Care and Communication

The communication within and between the client, the clinician other involved caregivers and the organisation should be well documented and documented correctly. Any encounter with Mr Clarke, Jason, and the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) should be well noted in the EHR (Kwame and Petrucka, 2021). Critical information that needs to be documented is any discussions that take place in the MDT format, any changes in Mr. Clarke’s condition and where relevant, decisions made concerning his management.

Record keeping is also important especially when dealing with the patients and their families (Bjerkan, Valderaune and Olsen, 2021). These notes should consist of the points covered in the discussions, the concern demonstrated by both Mr Clarke and Jason as well as the evidence given the former by the latter. This documentation makes it possible for all the members of the team to be acquainted with the patient’s and the family’s views and make sure that the details are incorporated into the care plan.

References

• Abe, T., Yamakawa, K., Ogura, H., Kushimoto, S., Saitoh, D., Fujishima, S., Otomo, Y., Kotani, J., Umemura, Y., Sakamoto, Y., Sasaki, J., Shiino, Y., Takeyama, N., Tarui, T., Shiraishi, S., Tsuruta, R., Nakada, T., Hifumi, T., Hagiwara, A. and Ueyama, M. (2020). Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations: sepsis prognostication in intensive care unit and emergency room (SPICE-ICU). Journal of Intensive Care, 8(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00465-0.
• Barrett, K. (2020). Care of the Acutely Ill Adult. [online] Google Books. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ANUBEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA225&dq=Safety+signs+including+CRP+level+and+WBC+must+also+be+observed+to+gauge+the+degree+of+the+body%E2%80%99s+response+to+infection+and+therapy+of+patients+with+the+sepsis+in+uk&ots=rxKyGgLDZs&sig=DOvMuetztMSwqn5aI_tne1ZYcPc [Accessed 3 Sep. 2024].
• Bjerkan, J., Valderaune, V. and Olsen, R.M. (2021). Patient Safety through Nursing Documentation: Barriers Identified by Healthcare Professionals and Students. Frontiers in Computer Science, [online] 3(1), pp.1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.624555.
• Bleakley, G. and Cole, M. (2020). Recognition and management of sepsis: The nurse’s role. British Journal of Nursing, [online] 29(21), pp.1248–1251. doi:https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.21.1248.
• Bos, M., Schouten, J., De Bot, C., Vermeulen, H. and Hulscher, M. (2023). A hidden gem in multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review on bedside nurses’ activities in daily practice regarding antibiotic use. JAC-antimicrobial resistance, [online] 5(6), p.dlad123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad123.
• CDC (2024). Hospital Sepsis Program Core Elements. [online] Sepsis. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/sepsis/hcp/core-elements/index.html [Accessed 3 Sep. 2024].
• Driessen, R.G.H., Heijnen, N.F.L., Hulsewe, R.P.M.G., Holtkamp, J.W.M., Winkens, B., van de Poll, M.C.G., van der Horst, I.C.C., Bergmans, D.C.J.J. and Schnabel, R.M. (2020). Early ICU-mortality in sepsis – causes, influencing factors and variability in clinical judgement: a retrospective cohort study. Infectious Diseases, 53(1), pp.61–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2020.1821912.
• Echevarria, C., Steer, J., Wason, J. and Bourke, S. (2021). Oxygen Therapy and Inpatient Mortality in COPD Exacerbation. Emergency Medicine Journal, 38(3), pp.170–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-209257.
• Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C.M., French, C., Machado, F.R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H.C., Schorr, C., Simpson, S., Wiersinga, W.J., Alshamsi, F., Angus, D.C., Arabi, Y., Azevedo, L., Beale, R., Beilman, G. and Belley-Cote, E. (2021). Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Critical Care Medicine, [online] 49(11). doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
• Garg, R., Tellapragada, C., Shaw, T., Eshwara, V.K., Shanbhag, V., Rao, S., Virk, H.S., Varma, M. and Mukhopadhyay, C. (2022). Epidemiology of sepsis and risk factors for mortality in intensive care unit: a hospital based prospective study in South India. Infectious Diseases (London, England), [online] 54(5), pp.325–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2021.2017475.
• Gyawali, B., Ramakrishna, K. and Dhamoon, A.S. (2019). Sepsis: the Evolution in Definition, Pathophysiology, and Management. SAGE Open Medicine, [online] 7(7), pp.1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119835043.
• Jarczak, D., Kluge, S. and Nierhaus, A. (2021). Sepsis—Pathophysiology and therapeutic concepts. Frontiers in Medicine, [online] 8(1), pp.1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.628302.
• Kwame, A. and Petrucka, P.M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: Barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing, [online] 20(158), pp.1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2.
• Lamprell, K., Arnolda, G., Delaney, G.P., Liauw, W. and Braithwaite, J. (2019). The challenge of putting principles into practice: Resource tensions and real‐world constraints in multidisciplinary oncology team meetings. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13166.
• Lindström, A.-C., Eriksson, M., Mårtensson, J., Oldner, A. and Larsson, E. (2021). Nationwide case–control study of risk factors and outcomes for community-acquired sepsis. Scientific Reports, 11(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94558-x.
• MacMillan, A., Rudinsky, D., Han, G., Elliott, J.O. and Jordan, K. (2019). Multidisciplinary Approach to Improve Sepsis Outcomes. Journal for Healthcare Quality: Official Publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality, [online] 41(4), pp.220–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000166.
• Martínez, M.L., Plata-Menchaca, E.P., Ruiz-Rodríguez, J.C. and Ferrer, R. (2020). An Approach to Antibiotic Treatment in Patients with Sepsis. Journal of Thoracic Disease, [online] 12(3), pp.1007–1021. doi:https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.01.47.
• Müller, M., Jürgens, J., Redaèlli, M., Klingberg, K., Hautz, W.E. and Stock, S. (2018). Impact of the Communication and Patient hand-off Tool SBAR on Patient safety: a Systematic Review. BMJ Open, [online] 8(8), pp.1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202.
• Namgung, M., Oh, J., Ahn, C., Kim, C.W., Lee, H. and Kang, H. (2022). Association between Glasgow Coma Scale in Early Carbon Monoxide Poisoning and Development of Delayed Neurological Sequelae: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(4), p.635. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040635.
• Raymond, Quinten, V.M., Mathilde, Bouma, H.R. and Ter, J.C. (2023). Predicting deterioration of patients with early sepsis at the emergency department using continuous heart rate variability analysis: a model-based approach. Predicting deterioration of patients with early sepsis at the emergency department using continuous heart rate variability analysis: a model-based approach, 31(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01078-w.
• Seccombe, A.W. (2022). UBIRA ETheses - The decision-making behind a fluid resuscitation prescription and the evidence-based assessment tools that are available to support it: A mixed-methods study. Bham.ac.uk. [online] doi:http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/12477/7/Seccombe2022MScbyRes.pdf.
• Seok, H., Jeon, J.H. and Park, D.W. (2020). Antimicrobial Therapy and Antimicrobial Stewardship in Sepsis. Infection & Chemotherapy, 52(1), p.19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2020.52.1.19.
• Shahid, S. and Thomas, S. (2018). Situation, background, assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) Communication Tool for Handoff in Health Care – a Narrative Review. Safety in Health, [online] 4(1), pp.1–9. Available at: https://safetyinhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40886-018-0073-1 [Accessed 3 Sep. 2024].
• Sosnowski, K., Lin, F., Chaboyer, W., Ranse, K., Heffernan, A. and Mitchell, M. (2022). The effect of the ABCDE/ABCDEF bundle on delirium, functional outcomes, and quality of life in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 138(138), p.104410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104410.
• Soukup, T., Lamb, B.W., James, Sevdalis, N. and Murtagh, G. (2023). Analysis of communication styles underpinning clinical decision-making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings. 14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105235.
• Sun, G.-D., Zhang, Y., Mo, S.-S. and Zhao, M.-Y. (2021). Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Caused by Sepsis: Risk Factor Analysis. International Journal of General Medicine, 14, pp.7159–7164. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s328419.
• Sygitowicz, G. and Sitkiewicz, D. (2020). Molecular mechanisms of organ damage in sepsis: an overview. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 24(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2020.09.004.
• Taberna, M. (2020). The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach and Quality of Care. Frontiers in Oncology, [online] 10(85), pp.1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00085.
• Tetsuya Yumoto, Hongo, T., Obara, T., Kohei Ageta, Toshiyuki Aokage, Kohei Tsukahara, Nakao, A. and Naito, H. (2024). Evolution and Effects of Ad Hoc Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in the Emergency Intensive Care Unit: A Five-Year Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(15), pp.4324–4324. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154324.
• Wihl, J., Rosell, L., Carlsson, T., Kinhult, S., Lindell, G. and Nilbert, M. (2021). Medical and Nonmedical Information during Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care. Current Oncology, 28(1), pp.1008–1016. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010098.
• Wright, T., Hope, V., Ciccarone, D., Lewer, D., Scott, J. and Harris, M. (2020). Prevalence and severity of abscesses and cellulitis, and their associations with other health outcomes, in a community-based study of people who inject drugs in London, UK. PLOS ONE, 15(7), p.e0235350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235350.