Ethical Challenges, Professional Integrity, and Responsible Action in the Workplace
Seeing deforestation by a multinational organization is deeply painful and shocking because it reflects environmental vandalism and the negation of sustainable development worldwide. This activity is damaging to species, exacerbates global warming, and relocates indigenous peoples. The anger stems from the feeling that we are destroying the planet and wasting our potential for future generations who may rely on these ecosystems. This ethical anger can motivate action through protesting personally by joining protests supporting environmental organizations or using the utilization of social media to reveal the bad deeds of the organization. Informer agencies or associations with NGOs to take legal action in contradiction of such performance can help develop the battle against such unsustainability. The proactive type of advocacy matches the concept of reactive ethics since it calls for overcoming adverse practices for the benefit of the larger society.
3 Years | PhD
Realizing that the boss appropriates our creations to pass them off as his or her own will automatically trigger anger because interpersonal and ethical standards have been violated. This situation hurts morale and distances the healthier participant from professional advancement, as their work is dismissed. The courage to act may involve engaging the boss politely to address the issue and correct the behaviour, and if necessary, reporting any incidence of plagiarism through appropriate channels, a concern often discussed in Online Assignment Help UK resources when addressing workplace ethics (Pakizekho and Barkhordari, 2022). Where this occurs, my approach is to follow it up with documented proof to ensure that management, whether human resources or senior leadership, takes the matter seriously. All such actions fall under maintaining ethical reputation, accountability, and professionalism in the workplace.
Witnessing an elderly man being attacked elicits a great deal of anger, out of the defender for the elderly man’s rights and wrongs injustice to be inflicted on such a person (Konings et al. 2022). Such action requires near-immediate courage whether by trying to stop the action gathering a general public to intercede or calling the police. Recording the event in case one will not be at a loss (if it is safe to do so) will serve as evidence inclusive of justice. Moral courage, described in the text, is also focused on the actions taken against harm even if there is personal danger.
This disturbance provokes anger because watching a single policeman being attacked disturbs the principles of law and order. This situation requires a rational and reasonable response in order to avoid further escalation of violence (Sheth, and Parvatiyar, 2021). The choices are trying to intervene with words only, assembling people around to support, and calling the police to ask for more backup if needed. Capturing the event on video helps with follow-up investigations and has people held responsible. There are concerns throughout the text with how ethical issues should be handled with the use of reason so that the individual is not put in harm’s way when contributing to the welfare of all.
Realizing that one is serviced by a dozing doctor taking care of a sick child triggers anger due to the threat to the child’s life feels in danger as well as frustration when one’s expectations of efficiency are betrayed. In such a case, it becomes crucial to take some action in order to protect the child’s health. From getting a second medical opinion an individual can get a better understanding of what is best for the child while filing a complaint formally informing the hospital authorities of the issue on their part. Reporting negligence transforms an incident into documentation by providing evidence that will assist in correcting negligence lapses.
If one receives remunerations from an incapable supervisor to perform a raw piece of work, this provokes anger because it is against one’s professional ethical standards. This scenario erodes integrity and breeds ethical violations/issues and ineffective harm to the institution (Fernando et al. 2022). The courage to act might mean not obeying commands; stressing organizational loyalty, quality, and honesty. Approaching coworkers or reporting the matter to managers can minimize such coercion.
Discriminatory practices that are forced upon an employee by their superior sparks anger due to unfairness, inequity, and unethical employment practices. They should take charge by first making sure they document such misconduct, immediately asserting the wrongdoing, and if possible reporting the matter to the human resource department or any other legal body. Sustaining ethical values protects personal ethical standards and organizational integrity. The material provides examples of standing up against unethical pressures and encourages people to protest against this kind of issue.
Get assistance from our PROFESSIONAL ASSIGNMENT WRITERS to receive 100% assured AI-free and high-quality documents on time, ensuring an A+ grade in all subjects.
Scholars also further categorize perceived injustice into perceived relatives’ injustice, community injustice, and self-injustice, and according to scholars, disinheritance from a close and wealthy relative may lead to the perception of injustice. The anger, however, is elicited by disappointments or perceived family unfairness and upside. Handling of such a case is best handled by taking emotionally fueled hits with rational counterattacks. Applying for legal advice is a stage to confirm that the relative was not pressured, coerced, or manipulated into making that decision. However, if the decision complies with the relative’s desires, and one does not have the idea of coercion, accepting their choice sweetly is the best respect they deserve (Springer, 2017). Whereas at a personal level, ethical considerations involve looking at the self and being considerate of the family in case the two options lead to expulsion, because emotions are certain ways cannot be undone, their importance cannot be overemphasized.
Watching poachers wanting to kill elephants by lacing water sources with poison triggers visceral hatred due to such feelings as indignation for animals and nature. Such actions for instance cause the destruction of habitats, threaten species, and display human apathy toward ecological harmonization (Amadasun, 2020). Courage to act might entail informing conservation authorities or local law enforcement agencies and mobilizing efforts with wildlife organizations to take necessary and fast action. Educating people about the consequences of poaching and helping to prevent the process by protecting the representatives of endangered species will also help permanently. The material stresses that the anger born of empathy does motivate people to fight environmental sin and promote environmentalism to save endangered species.
Being informed that a fellow worker has been offered a promotion on condition of extra-entanglement triggers a sense of injustice and anger for the wrongdoing as perceived under workplace etiquette (Servigne, and Stevens, 2020). This scenario is about harassment and exploitation that must be put down. Keeping the mouth closed is not the best solution here because the colleagues are advising needs to be directed to report the incident to HR or the management. The victim would be encouraged to take some form of action as the support provided ensures that he or she will not be retaliated against. If so, the opportunity should be taken personally by presenting the issue to leadership as a way to reinforce the commitment of the organization to the promotion of ethical standards.
Reference List
Journals
Books
Websites
The concept of the reason for ‘doing the right thing’ should employed that it is the right thing must be done and this is a strong ethical principle. This perception emphasized that the activities required to be guided with the help of moral duties rather than other outcomes (Ng, and Sears, 2020). This perspective stresses the point that action should be taken only due to moral obligations rather than incentives.
In its principle, it encourages behaviors to be motivated by values, ideals, interests, and purpose other than the desire for a reward, fame, or money, or to avoid getting a punishment. This is in concord with Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory, which has it that morality should be better in terms of duty and a principle of duty-based ethics. Ethical correctness for its own benefit guarantees cordiality and non-prejudiced action. For example, in a workplace, eradicating discrimination because it is right increases fairness and equality, regardless of the cost to the person, who is considered to be right. Likely do whistleblowers themselves, since they at times do this highly ethically correct although at personal risk to themselves since self-utility also does not come into it. This same incentive benefits society by boosting trust and the moral fabric of people.
The principle is perfect but practicing it is not because ethical decision-making occurs in the context of uncertainties interests and risks (Septianto et al. 2020). For instance, if an employee has to report abuse by his or her superior. Being ethical, one risks getting into trouble, being fired, or getting killed. In such instances, the corporative conscience is challenged by the actual loss that ethical action entails. Further, social rules and cultural standards regulate what a specific society or group of people reflects as suitable as the right thing to do. What may be moral in one case, may not be moral in another. Such inconsistency makes it difficult to apply standard ethical theories and rules, which again emphasizes the need to balance context sensitivity and consistency.
This principle takes everyone dangerously close to an exclusively teleological view of ethical action, which is not where it is required to head at this point (Rifkin, 2022). Though the premise is that a proper action must not be based on expected returns, it is valuable to assess them. For example, concern for unsafe working conditions is the violative of duty ethical consideration since it contends providing a safe working environment is an ethical obligation of employees; however, it also enhances a safer working environment for all the employees as a means of ethical regulation, reflecting the integration of deontological and consequentialism ethics. In some circumstances, individuals may require further incentive prompting them to adhere to the general ethical principle of doing the right thing, that incentive being, the consequence. For example, environmental activism is not only based on moral considerations but also on the practical view of the future use of environmental resources. Even though the action being taken is legal, the positives that come out of it are even more justified ethically.
The principle is also an example of Empathetic Anger as contained in the course material. Care can be seen as a spur to moral bravery in that a person with care for another is prompted to act against wrong, evil, or abuse. From combating ivory poachers to reporting harassment at work or standing up for an individual who is being pulled down for any one reason or another, empathy creates a moral imperative beyond self-interest (Andrews, 2018). The last perspective discussed in the text complements the examples given, including the activities of the whistleblowers as Joseph Rotblat and Siegfried Sassoon when they endanger their lives to fight against unethical actions. It proved that this principle holds up even today because they were not motivated by self-interest financial gains in the short term but made the right decision based on ethical responsibility.
Perhaps it’s a matter of principle but I do not think that it is wrong to impose some measure of realism over idealism. Ethical decisions take time, energy, and even gall, especially when trying to address systems or when confronted with resistance. Concerns can be documented and support can be sought while at the same time implementing a working proportional strategy when it comes to ethics dilemmas, following all the information acquired in the course.
Reference List
Journals
Books
Websites
This is so because whilst an individual decision-maker has the requisite ethical duty to perform, the same cannot be said of members in collective decision-making. For anyone who would be making a decision it comes with full responsibility for the decision made both ethically and legally. They need to make sure that their decision is ethical given that there is no passing of the buck here. This general accountability entails that the individual needs to assess the consequences of his decisions with the consent of his/her professional and personal ethics. In the case of the collective decision, each member of the group bears the ethical consequences of decision-making. Although such an arrangement optimizes the participation and cooperation of each person, it also has the effect of bending the shares to be held accountable (Herkert et al. 2020). This is especially the case when the group pressures, either conformity, hierarchy, or groupthink force them to ignore their own conscience and conform to the others’ decisions. Every member of the collective has personal responsibility for adherence to the ethical norms. Though one may act in accordance with a group decision and contribute equally to the production of unprofessional work, one is not released from any kind of blame harassment to the team.
When the decision interrupts the ethical standards
If a collective decision is unethical it is wrong such as fabrication, prejudice, or negligence then it is wrong to obey (Englehardt et al. 2021). For example, if a team decides to distort figures to fit goals in an organization, an individual should be willing to seek change, report a violation, or take it to the next level. Ideas of what is professional are far from conforming to group norms as it is underlined in the material studied in the course.
When the decision troubles the groups or individual
Refusal is warranted where a decision is socially unjust and imposes a gross burden on the affected groups than can be justified, such as dismissing workers without proper thought or practicing environmental atrocity, for instance, by polluting the environment. Ethical responsibility concerns consist of the defense of those who cannot necessarily protect themselves after analyzing moral courage.
When the decision fights against legal responsibilities
Many people may rally, pressure one, or lead to their dismissal, but they must meet the legal requirements. For instance, a group working on a project might choose to compromise safety standards to meet the project’s target, an individual has no right to go against safety standards and has to report the issue. Anything to a similar effect is not only unethical but also leaves one open for legal implications.
When the decision challenges trust issues
Refusal of collective decisions that harm the trust that an organization has developed with its stakeholders is justified. For instance, if a team decides to deceive clients or customers through fraud and other unfair means, saying no to such a decision is equally ethical as the best practice demands that people tell the truth.
Although the decision is made collectively, this ensures that everyone in a group is implicated, which is good for encouraging cooperation and reducing the burden on every person though does not free anyone from having to make ethical decisions (Chary, 2024). What is expected of a member is to analyze the decision made and determine the ethical practice to be undertaken knowing this is against a group decision. Failure to accept unethical collective decisions protects ethical standards in the profession and this course emphasizes the need to adhere to ethical standards, and protecting these standards portrays ethical behavior.
Reference List
Journals
Books
Of all the topics covered in the book, moral courage was one of the most intriguing ideas. The cases of Siegfried Sassoon and Joseph Rotblat proved that personal interests are concerned when a person decides to become an ethical whistle-blower. Their activities emphasize the determinant of sticking to a given value irrespective of the eventual consequences giving a compelling plot about ethics courage and society.
The information on the importance of reactive ethics and how anger can spur ethic ideas was rather stimulating. The concept that empathetic anger puts people into solving unethical practices contradicts conventional thinking about anger. Rather, it positions managed wrath as an effective agent of social and organizational transformation; and encouragement to consider how passion informs ethical choice.
The part that attracted the greatest concern was the one concerning organizational negligence and ethical misconduct, for example, the Boeing 737 Max disasters. All these examples go to show that putting profit before ethical consideration is always a calamity waiting to happen. ‘They stress the importance of clear professionalism, especially where people and society are most vulnerable, at the same time opposing corruption and other unlawful activities in organizations.
The content also stressed the importance of having ethical measures when in the world of professionals. He insisted that more often than not ethical failures are rooted in the little moral catalog or organizational failures. The notion of having a graded system for ethical concerns which entails writing down concerns, raising issues in relation to the severity, and getting outside help when needed offered real-world solutions to maintaining ethical behavior. This has shaped my thinking about compliance with professional standards to appreciate its criticality in asserting the individual’s commitment to professional ethics is not just important but structural in maintaining trust and accountability in the workplace.
Technology development should conform to the principles of ethical standards of fairness, transparency, and accountability and consequently, both Governments and regulatory bodies should put in place effective measures to protect such principles. The change in technology practices as well as the ethical concerns and the policy regulation can only be solved through the joint effort of different experts and the community. This is so because public participation assists in both the perception and management of risk factors. Technological advancement should embrace aspects of environmental conservation including affairs relating to energy efficient systems and circular economy. It is a recommendation that organizations should cultivate ethical sensitization among their developers and decision-makers to embrace the spirit of thinking through the possible consequences of developing technologies.
Reference List
Journals
Books
Websites
Introduction Get free samples written by our Top-Notch subject experts for taking online Assignment...View and Download
1.0 Introduction to Challenges In Pursuing Justice For Cases Assignment The “European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)”...View and Download
Introduction to Research Methods and Engineering Projects This document presents a detailed outline and content reflecting a...View and Download
Introduction Get Free Online Assignment Samples from UK's Best Assignment Help Experts to boost your academic...View and Download
Task 1: If you're struggling with complex healthcare topics, our College Assignment Help services offer expert support for...View and Download
INTRODUCTION Achieve your academic goals with ease by availing our professional Assignment Help services. 1.1...View and Download
Copyright 2025 @ Rapid Assignment Help Services
