Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) and Their Importance - A Full Guide in this Sample by Native Writers
International trade is a key mechanism through which different nations come closer by gaining opportunities to exchange products, services, and resources. It contributes to economic growth, creates employment opportunities, and facilitates the distribution of goods across markets. The following report focuses on three major aspects of world trade. The first section examines the role of cross-country competition policies in promoting fairness and stability within market structures. The next section discusses the classical theory of disturbances, which is used to measure trade costs and analyze international trade dynamics. Furthermore, the report explores different forms of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) and their importance for countries participating in the global marketplace. Students aiming to strengthen their understanding of global trade theories and policies can enhance their academic performance with expert guidance through Assignment Help in UK.
9 Years | LLB
Discussion
International competition policy is the set of regulations that aim to make competition of business firms across national borders fair (Kira et al. 2021). Its main function is to protect activities that are interfering with free trade, this include monopolies, collusive nature or unfair entry barriers. Hence this policy of making the environment competitive has the benefits of purchase efficiency, innovations on services being offered to consumers with a view of reducing prices among other factors.
To some extent one of the aims is making it fairer and ensuring that a similar game may be played by companies located in various countries. This has a relevance in international commerce because these deviations can harm the small firm or a developing country. In addition, international competition policy lengthens the cooperation scope in trade relations with other countries and reduces misunderstanding and conflict (Jacobides and Lianos, 2021). As the institution charged with the responsibility of generating business alongside encouraging equity on the international market, it plays a role in stabilising the global market.
Some of the key supports of the International competition policy include; Legislation relating to monopoly, Legislation of nature and right and appropriate price Legislation of necessary and timely access to markets. Antitrust laws also act centrally to ensure that no specific companies dominate the market/unyielding to change their ways of conducting their business such as collusion. They assist in preventing the large firms from exercising their totalitarianism in the identified sectors.
Another concentration is dishonest behaviour such as engaging in the act of selling products at extremely low prices to the effect that the domestic competitors turn out of business. The latter policies make it easy to properly engage in antitrust practices or support antitrust sentiments and advance the cause of transparency (Camargo, 2021). Also, measures are provided to enhance the standard of entry to ensure that the risk of any venture trying to penetrate foreign markets has as few obstacles as possible to its operations.
Global organisations undergo various challenges and opportunities due to their encounters in the different competition policies of the countries they operate in. Global organisations have to be extremely careful on the antitrust laws and standards of the country they are operating in so as not to be penalised or limited (Turgunpulatovich, 2022). For example, they entail approval from the bodies of regulators to prevent their consequences of monopolies and minimised competition.
Encountering such policies requires the firm to change some of its operational structures including the price model, marketing technique or the expansion plan to the local policy (Siripipatthanakul, 2021). That, however, saves the current rules from unfair practices, at the same time, introducing some difficulties, primarily when the policies are divergent from one region to another. Illustrations of enforcement are penalties for anti-competition conduct or exclusion of some business activities.
There are several constraints to entering into and enforcing the principles of an international competition policy, mainly because there are a variety of jurisdictions and countries that require concerted action (Cini and Czulno, 2022). Competition laws as well as the mechanism for enforcing these laws differ from country to country, and do not necessarily correspond with others. For instance, a specific business practice is regarded as unfair in one country, but has no such problem in another country.
Get assistance from our PROFESSIONAL ASSIGNMENT WRITERS to receive 100% assured AI-free and high-quality documents on time, ensuring an A+ grade in all subjects.
The former is a major challenge to the DCFTA because of balancing the national interests of the EU members with the international norms of the WTO. In consequence, governments were trying to have their back shielded by various measures that might contradict the disciplines that have been set up to support the international and non-discriminatory competition. For example, while some states afford certain matters like subsidies or trade protections for local firms as legal and acceptable despite the fact that they amount to unfair competition.
International Competition policies had immense impacts over different organisations and thereby established the fact that these policies play a crucial role in regulating the organisations external business strategies (Kira et al. 2021). The EU particularly hard regulated the personalised software giant In Microsoft where the technology firm faced legal charges and litigations. For example, the EU competition authority found that Microsoft had started bundling software products that would dominate the markets thus denying consumers the opportunity to shift between various software products that could meet their needs in the market.
Also, Google, like the largest social sites, has received numerous investigations and penalties from all over the world; especially from different authorities in the European Union and in the United State of America (Jacobides and Lianos, 2021). Concerned topics include noncompetitiveness such as the anti-competitives uses of search engine results and utilising high entry barriers on digital advertising competition. These cases illustrate the position, which shows that competition policy in the international context aims at parity in undertakings.
Trade barriers in this context refers to those measures put in place by governments within their domestic jurisdiction’s that distort trade. These barriers provide a scenario that may appear like: They can be calculated as tariffs, a charge on imports and then there is quotas, a limited amount of some goods that is imported; they also encompass the non-tariff barriers which embrace bureaucratic regulations and practices and standardisation (Vo and Vo, 2023). In fact, there is evidence that trade barriers are erected to protect sensitive domestic industries and since they alter the right trading relationship of goods and services between countries, they are not efficient. Trading barriers limit the market access to the new market opportunities and competition in the provision of products within the platform of the international business.
The conventional theory of distortions helps to explain how some policies or barriers distort Markets. These distortions do not permit the markets to bring supply and demand into line effectively or the concept of twine. These include subsidies, tariffs or quotas that alter either price or quantity or even both situations that are inefficient. As for welfare losses, it should also be mentioned that, according to the conclusion based on this theory, distortions in the trade quite often imply adverse effects (Espinosa et al. 2024). For example, whenever the common use of tariffs is made to increase the price of imported goods, the consumers will be forced to pay more; consequently, they will have lower incomes than before.
It falls under welfare economics which concerns itself with how the general wellbeing of all people can be achieved. As pointed out previously, distortions normally have the impact of reducing market profits and, therefore, promote unfair profits between the winning and losing countries and enterprises.
Trade barriers are trade ideas that can also be measured according to the level of trade external shock and the efficiency of a market. Two major types of trade barriers are understood: tariff barriers and non-tariff barriers (Jha, 2020). The definition of the tariff barriers include imposition of taxes or duties that in one form or another affect the price of the imported goods. These are barriers that are not tariffs that are imposed on imports; the barriers include; requirements, quota and customs.
Another way of ascertaining levels of trade barriers is using what is referred to as the comparison of price of the exported as well as imported necessities to the domestically manufactured ones (Ahmed et al. 2021). The other one is the effective rate of protection which measures the total degree of protection afforded by the tariffs put on value addition of production in a specific sector. ERP represents a splendid example of how theoretical reasoning of trade policies influencing domestic producers takes place.
The advantage of the classical theory of distortions is its practical nature in the sense of its possible usefulness for policymakers, it creates an opportunity to determine the nature of trade barriers. Making use of a snapshot at how tariffs, subsidies or quotas result into inefficiencies, the theory plays the role of providing policy directions on how the issues can be minimised (Rubanda et al. 2022). For example, it can help make decisions aiming at either scrapping or reducing too many redundant tariffs that rather have a negative impact by elevating the costs of the product to the consumer and producer.
This theory is equally relevant in the process of arriving at the new generation of multilateral trade agreements including those conducted in WTO. This framework assists the countries to assess how the barriers to trade affect market access, and which reforms are designed to promote equity, efficiency (Sanchez-Bayon et al. 2024). They provide the platform for the trade liberalisation negotiations in that we are aimed at reducing the restrictiveness of the barriers to the cross-border activities.
This study found the use of the classical theory of distortions somewhat helpful albeit finding the practical application of this theory somewhat limited (Vo and Vo, 2023). Main criticism is that it assumes perfect competition and perfect knowledge and that all the market players are rational. In practice, there are cases where there might be monopoly or lack of information elements which are invisible in the theory. Besides, theory essentially solely seeks to address the cruder ‘actual and current’ trade distortions virtually ignoring aspects related to non trade barriers such as culture and politics regarding the NTBs.
A limitation is that it cannot be made for different capacities in various economic systems. For instance, sometimes it has some drawbacks as a concept where developing countries are concerned (Espinosa et al. 2024). They often do not possess requisite infrastructures. Besides, with reference to the engagement of the policy change theory, it is often characterised by major shifts in political and economic affairs which may not be easy.
PTA is another form of trade liberalisation whereby countries embark on a process of bargaining for better trade arrangements for some preferred products. The major driving force in PTAs is the desire for greater liberalisation of the economy and are supposed to provide ‘better’ market access to the participating countries (Burri, 2023). Among the most well-understood PTAs are the Free Trade Agreement (FTA’s), Customs Unions and Economic Unions.
Since PTAs encourage fabrication and coordination of those nations in the party, they are of immense significance in the global economy. They advocate for trade by reducing cost, expanding markets and smoothing the flow of goods and services (Kachler et al. 2023). To businesses, PTAs create a circle of competition in member nations and stimulate exports and investment. PTAs has a function in the globalised economy to stimulate growth, help countries create employment and enhance regional integration. EU and RCEP are experimental forms of PTAs, they provide insight on how PTAs consequently impact trade and economic development in the world.
The Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) imply that, at least, the tariffs and non-tariff border barriers between member countries are either reduced or abolished and that they have every right to pick up their policies with regard to the non-member countries (Cardinali et al. 2023). Others are the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA now USMCA) and the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA).
Common Markets takes it a notch higher by establishing correlation of factor markets with the products of factors of production which are; The commodities, services, funds, and manpower. The East African Community for instance functioned as a common market.
Bilateral and Regional Agreements are agreements which are formed between two states whether singly or between two or more states in a particular region (Milsom et al. 2021). Some of them include; Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) which foster regional integration trade relations.
That said there are some reasons as to why PTAs are formed. Below are some of the reasons Different rationales. These have to do with the liberalisation of markets, the realisation of economies of scale, and enabling countries to achieve greater levels of efficiency by specialising in, making products in which they could obtain the most efficiency (Soutar, 2021). This in turn promotes trade productivity as well as its development. The political argument is focused on the strengthening of political relations, and stability. PTAs create trade relations which have little chance of having a conflict revolution which in turn promotes stability in the region.
The rather micro level strategic imperative here therefore is anti-protectionism and global competitiveness (Dashore et al. 2021). When the countries join the PTA, they have the bargaining power of trade, can easily eliminate risk markets and at the same time attract foreign investors.
Advantages: PTA’s are arrangements that entail the elimination of constraints in trade which in turn enhances the encouragement of the formation of trade among the members (Burri, 2023). They encourage economic interdependence as a kind of policy through which nations can reposition towards sectors they are core competitive in. PTAs also lead to the creation of larger markets, demand for foreign investors, and consumers end up getting products of their choice at cheaper prices.
Disadvantages: But they also cause trade diversion shifts of commerce from more productive non-PTA countries to less productive PTA countries due to preference. This has the general impact on reducing efficiency on world platforms (Kachler et al. 2023). Another issue is the inequality between the members which may find that some countries who are small and possibly less developed are singly competing with the large developed economies.
NAFTA/USMCA: They include the now USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) that eliminated most tariffs between countries within the trading group (Cardinali et al. 2023). This includes the North American Free Trade Agreement- NAFTA. It promoted business even as individuals grumbled of job losses due to outsourcing.
European Union (EU): The EU in turn represents a peculiar example of a full-fledged economic and especially monetary union supplemented with free movement of goods, services, capital and people. It has enhanced both trade and economic convergence and rates and though, it was not above some few challenges that included the Brexit episode, which was more of social class imbalances among members.
RCEP: The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership is Asia-Pacific’s big trade liberalisation deal aiming at liberalisation of trade and integration of economies of fifteen participating countries (Milsom et al. 2021). That makes sense to increase the regional value chains but important participants such as the United States are neglected, raising international implications.
Conclusion
The report evaluates the role of competition policy in international trade analysis of the barriers to trade and the preferential arrangements. Measures for competitors from various countries are intended to ensure fair competitive practices; definitions for such trade barriers are going to be provided by the classical theory of distortions. Types of cooperation such as the Free trade agreements, customs unions improve trading and economic cooperation but there arise issues such as trade diversion and trading injustices. These are knowledge areas that are crucial in the case that organisations are to perform well in the global economy.
Reference List
Journals
Chapter 1: Introduction Get Free Online Assignment Samples from UK's Best Assignment Help Experts to boost your...View and Download
Adult Mental Health and Patient Care in London Our Online Assignment Help experts are here to guide you through your research...View and Download
Introduction:Vascular Dementia Get free samples written by our Top-Notch subject experts for taking online Assignment...View and Download
Task 1: Management and Leadership This Leading Change in a Multinational Organization Assignment critically evaluates BP...View and Download
Introduction Get free samples written by our Top-Notch subject experts for taking help from our assignment...View and Download
Task1 Get ahead in your academic journey with Rapid Assignment Help, your trusted provider of exceptional Assignment Help...View and Download
Copyright 2025 @ Rapid Assignment Help Services
