Get free samples written by our Top-Notch subject experts for taking online Assignment Help services.
Perhaps the most intricate challenge leaders face is to keep their organisations relevant in a rapidly changing world (Aslam, 2018). We live in a time of great change, where old certainties are being challenged and new opportunities are emerging seemingly from everywhere. Technology has upended industries and reconfigured the ways we work and live (Woo, E.J. and Kang, E., 2020).
Leading in a world of constant change is an essential quality of leadership. The ability to adapt and change with the times is a critical skill for any leader, and is especially important in the context of social movements. The leadership approaches described in Block 3 each has strengths and weaknesses when it comes to addressing the changing nature of leadership. It is crucial to have a knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of each so that one can critique the approach described in this block in the most effective manner possible. Society needs leaders who can adapt, experiment, and learn. Leadership for social change is an approach to leadership in which leadership is practised for the purpose of changing individuals and groups, organisations and government. In other words, it’s a kind of leadership that isn’t necessarily about power and control, although it is often about change (Malinga et al., 2019).
The leadership field has been evolving at a prompt pace in the past few years. Many are now familiar with the concept of leadership as a skill, which can be developed and enhanced through training and practice. However, a new leadership approach is emerging that seeks to go beyond the traditional approach of training and education, and instead emphasizes leadership as a practice of social change (Sarla,2020). This new approach is centred around the idea that leadership is not only a set of skills that can be taught and learned, but is a movement that is legislated in the world, and which demands a precise set of mastery, qualities, and demeanours in order to turn out to be triumphant.
Leadership can be defined as the proficiency to take action to change reality (Barentsen, 2019). Leading can involve taking some or all of the following actions: planning, motivating, organizing, managing, influencing, or influencing and negotiating with others. To understand the significance of the social change, we need to first understand the importance of leadership. The capacity for leadership is a fundamental human ability. It is also one of the most essential elements of leadership. This is because leadership is based on the capacity for people to identify and act on a vision, mission and purpose through creating a culture. Incorporated approaches of leadership are required for social modification. The leadership approach we focus on in this course is the leadership for social change approach, which focuses on activism, grassroots organizing and leadership development. This approach has been shown in research to be more effective than other leadership approaches in engaging and mobilizing communities, particularly communities of colour and low-income communities, to achieve social change (Jackson).
This approach also emphasizes the importance of leadership for social change, which focuses on the structural barriers communities face and come together to identify solutions for those barriers. Leadership for social change is a practice-based way of understanding and developing leadership skills through the engagement of individuals and groups in the work of social change. It is not a particular type of leadership (Hess, 2018). New industries have emerged, and existing ones have changed in ways that were unimaginable just a few decades ago.No one ever became a great leader without great adversity. The ability to overcome failure is a genuine sign of a prominent leader. But in an ever-changing world, the ability to change with the times is just as important as the ability to withstand failure (Roosevelt).
In a world of rapid evolution and constant turmoil, leadership is more demanded than ever. In a world of swift change, the ability to adapt to change is increasingly important. The traditional definition of leadership has been broadened to include a range of new styles, such as leadership for social change. The hallmark of this approach is the willingness to take risks and to resist the status quo. This style of leadership is associated with social justice, environmentalism, anti-racism and other causes (Madzimure, 2020). The ability to inspire, motivate and empower a team is a critical skill in any leader, but the ability to navigate the complex challenges of our time requires something more. It requires leadership for social change. In the past, leadership concentrated on the necessities of a few. The leaders of the social reformation movements of the 19th and 20th centuries were often at the forefront of social change. Martin Luther King, Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, and other social reformers used nonviolent civil disobedience to challenge the status quo and bring about social reform. Many of these leaders also used a leadership style that was resistant to the existing power structure. This style of leadership was based on the premise that the movement should not be led by an elite few, but rather by the people (Bolsinger, 2018).
In the past decade, leadership has been in the spotlight. For example, hundreds of thousands of people have watched President Obama give the commencement address at Rutgers University, or Pope Francis give a speech to a joint meeting of Congress. The world is hungry for leadership. A few powerful leaders spoke for the masses. They were charismatic and vocal about the needs of their groups. But times have changed. Society at present is distinctly different from the society of yesterday. This world is characterized by rapid change and uncertainty and is constantly faced with competing priorities, new challenges, and uncertainty (Buzinde et al., 2019).
The weakness of the leadership for social change approach is that the participants who are involved in this approach do not assess the influence of the social and economic background in which they operate. A weakness of the leadership for social change approach, identified by various studies and scholars, was that it was difficult to understand and implement and that the process was not necessarily linear or predictable. In the current economic climate. leaders may find it difficult to persuade their followers to do things that may not necessarily be a good idea (Eizaguirre and Parés, 2019).
The work of social change is often misunderstood, so it is important to define what social change is, and where it can be found. It can be described as the transformation of systems of power and/or relationships that privilege some groups over others. It is a form of leadership that doesn’t necessarily involve power and control but is, instead, a way of understanding and developing leadership skills through the engagement of individuals and groups in the work of social change. It is not a particular type of leadership. Social change can be challenging because change is resisted and people are not always willing to change. To effectively lead people through change, we need to use the skills of persuasion and the tools of influence. As leaders, everybody can be a part of social change. Social change happens when people come together and change systems of power and privilege. This change can be difficult because change is often resisted and people are not always willing to change. But, to effectively lead people through change, leaders need to use the skills of persuasion and the tools of influence. Leadership is not an abstract concept. People need leadership to make sense of, interpret and respond to the changes affecting the world in which they live.
Get Better Grades In Every Subject
Submit Your Assignments On Time
Trust Academic Experts Based in UK
Your Privacy is Our Topmost Concern
Copyright 2023 @ Rapid Assignment Help Services
offer valid for limited time only*