Manufacturing Sustainable Practices And Standards Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads531
• Pages8
• Words1898

Introduction to Manufacturing Sustainable Practices And Standards Assignment

The methodology chapter describes the structured method developed in this research to examine and discern sustainable manufacturing practices in the UAE and in Germany. The following section details how the research design, techniques, and instruments were devised to collect and analyse the data. This is guided by the need to achieve valid and reliable findings which can be generalised to a larger population. Since the nature of the study is such that one can identify trends or can test relationships between variables that are related across different contexts, the quantitative approach has been chosen.

Manufacturing Sustainable Practices And Standards Assignment Sample

Liked This Sample? Hire Me Now

Emma Johnson 5 Years | PhD

Reference materials and sample assignments are shared to help students gain clarity on academic formats and improve their writing approach. As a trusted assignment help in UK, we ensure guidance is provided without compromising originality. The Manufacturing Sustainable Practices And Standards Assignment Sample demonstrates proper structure, analysis, and logical presentation of findings. These materials are strictly meant for reference and learning purposes only.

Research Onion

The research design has multiple layers, representing the key decisions taken to determine the central architecture of the research. Others include the research philosophy, approach, strategy, time horizon, and data collection methods (Saunders et al., 2021). The selection of this component is justifying with the objectives of the present study.

Research Philosophy

Research philosophy is the belief system about knowledge generation and handling. The philosophical beliefs that have been commonly accepted among them include working with positivism, realism, interpretivism, and pragmatism. This particular study is selected by positivism. Positivism holds that reality is objective and can be measured empirically (Park, Konge and Artino, 2020). It favors quantitative data and statistical analysis to verify hypotheses and reach conclusions. This philosophy suits the study in hand since it enables the researcher to test sustainable manufacturing practices in terms of measurable indicators, trends, and correlation.

Research Approach

It is the research approach which denotes where we have constructed the study and how and from where we got the conclusions. The two broad kinds of approaches are inductive and deductive. The approach taken in this research is deductive: having hypotheses based on existing theory or general idea and then collecting and analysing the data to see if they are supported (Chirkov and Anderson, 2018). The deductive approach is appropriate for this study because, by its nature, the work can be structured on existing frameworks for sustainable manufacturing (Khanna, 2019). This means testing how different factors such as regulations, technology, and market trends affect the levels of implementation of sustainable practice in two different countries.

Research Design

The research design is the plan of the study on how to achieve the goals. The nature of the study determines whether the research design is exploratory, descriptive, experimental or quasi-experimental. A descriptive research design has been used for the present research. In describing research, the researchers observe, describe, and document the aspects of a situation that are naturally occurring (Aggarwal and Ranganathan, 2019). This will be the perfect design in studies where the objective is to learn details about a phenomenon and not to manipulate variables (Ranganathan and Aggarwal, 2018). This enables the collection of numerical data that can be used to provide patterns and comparisons across two regions with different regulatory environments and industry configurations.

Locale of Study and Period

The geographical areas where data will be collected are referred to as the locale of the study. The research covers two countries: the United Arab Emirates and Germany. They have been chosen because of the inequitable industrial framework and sustainability in manufacturing approaches for these countries. Participants will come from industrial hubs in the UAE located in Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Sharjah. Participants came from key manufacturing regions of Germany such as Bavaria, Baden Württemberg, and North Rhine Westphalia. An entire research process time period stretches from October 2024 to August 2025.

Population and Respondents

The two terms used in the earlier example are research study population and respondent, the latter being a narrower term indicating the specific individuals who have been selected to participate in a research study and provide data. The population for this research are the professionals working in the UAE and Germany manufacturing sectors, with the sustainability knowledge and experience. These include sustainability officers, production managers, compliance experts, supply chain analysts, and other personnel. The respondents will be selected based on their participation in sustainability initiatives in their organisations.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Professionals currently working in the manufacturing sector in the UAE or Germany
• Minimum of 2 years’ experience in sustainability or production roles
• Fluency in English

Exclusion Criteria:

• Interns or students without industry experience
• Professionals from non-manufacturing sectors
• Individuals who have not been involved in any sustainability-related initiatives

Sampling Framework

The research uses a purposive sampling framework to select those with direct experience of sustainable manufacturing practices in the UAE and Germany. This non-probability technique helps the researcher to selectively target knowledgeable participants in environmental policies, industrial framework savvy, and corporate sustainability strategy (Marcus et al., 2019). A sample size of 75 to 100 participants will be taken to get balanced country input on the survey. Professional networks will initially be used to identify experts and then a snowball sampling strategy will be used to broaden expertise.

Data Collection Methods

The study will draw on both primary and secondary data collection (Cheong et al., 2023). Structured close-ended questionnaires will be distributed electronically through primary data research to the manufacturing professionals in the UAE and Germany. These questionnaires will be designed to solicit measurable responses from the users using a 5-point Likert scale. Data collected in secondary will be from peer-reviewed journal articles, industry reports, government publications, and sustainability frameworks applicable to manufacturing.

Hypotheses in the Study

Since this is a study of this nature, the hypotheses are formulated to test specific relationships between the identified variables (Shahzad et al., 2022). The main contribution deals with the hypothesis of a big difference between implementing sustainable manufacturing practices in the UAE and Germany. The sub-hypotheses are as follows: Regulatory polices are very important in sustainable manufacturing adoption, and technological innovations can significantly improve sustainability efforts (Hermawan et al., 2023). The statistical methods to test these hypotheses will be t-tests and regression analysis. Based on a review of existing literature, they are developed to provide support for a comparative analysis of how different factors impact assessing sustainability performance in various industrial and policy environments.

Research Instrument

The instrument for the research proposed in this study is a structured questionnaire consisting of 20 close-ended questions aligned on a 5-point Likert scale. The questions are in sustainable manufacturing, relevant dimensions of environmental performance, policy influence, technological integration, and stakeholder engagement. The instrument develops each question to the research objectives and hypotheses, ensuring that the instrument captures data related to the study’s core interest.

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are paramount for a reliable and accurate research output. Reliability will be measured using Cronbach's alpha to test the internal consistency of the questionnaire. An acceptable reliability value will be 0.67 or higher. Content and construct validity will be addressed through expert review of the questionnaire to confirm validity.

Data Analysis Plan

The data from the structured questionnaires will be analysed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Descriptive statistical techniques such as means, frequencies and percentages will be applied to summarise respondents’ responses in the study (Cooksey, 2020). To compare sustainability practices between the UAE and Germany, inferential statistical methods such as t-tests will be utilised for comparison, correlation, and regression analysis to examine the relationship between variables like regulations, technology and stakeholder influence. Based on the significance levels of these tests, we will conduct hypothesis testing. The chosen analysis plan is consistent with the quantitative approach, allowing for objective reading and generalisation of the results.

Ethical Considerations

To the plainest possibility, this research adheres strictly to ethical principles as it is designed, implemented and reported. An information sheet listing the purpose of the study, their rights and assurance of anonymity and confidentiality will be given to the participants. Participation in the study will be based on informed consent, and individuals will have the right to withdraw at any time. There will be no collection or disclosure of personal identifying data. The data will be stored securely and only for academic purposes. The study will involve institutional research ethics protocols and a completed ethics checklist for formal approval, and the completed ethics checklist will coincide with the paragraph that expounds on the absence of ethical conflicts.

Research Limitations

However, the research may be limited by the methodology. Second, for analysis, the sample size was adequate. However, it might not have captured entirely the entire manufacturing sector in both countries to the point of generalisability (Ardolino, Bacchetti and Ivanov, 2022). Second, differences in language in Germany may result in the misinterpretation of some of the items on the questionnaire, even though it is directed towards English-speaking professionals. Secondly, the study depends on self-reported data that may result in bias or socially desirable responses. Also, the study is cross-sectional, precluding the assessment of the long-term impact of the sustainability practices. However, when interpreting the results of these limitations will be acknowledged.

Conclusion

This chapter has also described the detailed methodological framework for a comparative study on sustainable manufacturing practices in the UAE and Germany. The research follows a descriptive design using a positivist philosophical basis and a deductive approach. Structured questionnaires will be used to collect the data which will be analysed using statistical tools used for testing the hypothesis.

References

• Aggarwal, R. and Ranganathan, P. (2019). Study designs: Part 2 – descriptive studies. Perspectives in Clinical Research, [online] 10(1), pp.34–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18.
• Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A. and Ivanov, D. (2022). Analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic’s impacts on manufacturing: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Operations Management Research, 15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00225-9.
• Cheong, H., Lyons, A., Houghton, R. and Majumdar, A. (2023). Secondary Qualitative Research Methodology Using Online Data within the Context of Social Sciences. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, [online] 22(1), pp.1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231180160.
• Chirkov, V. and Anderson, J. (2018). Statistical positivism versus critical scientific realism. A comparison of two paradigms for motivation research: Part 1. A philosophical and empirical analysis of statistical positivism. Theory & Psychology, 28(6), pp.712–736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318804670.
• Cooksey, R.W. (2020). Descriptive Statistics for Summarising Data. Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data, [online] 1(1), pp.61–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_5.
• Hermawan, A.N., Masudin, I., Zulfikarijah, F., Restuputri, D.P. and Shariff, R. (2023). The effect of sustainable manufacturing on environmental performance through government regulation and eco-innovation. International journal of industrial engineering and operations management. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ijieom-04-2023-0039.
• Khanna, P. (2019). Positivism and Realism. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, [online] pp.151–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_59.
• Marcus, B., Weigelt, O., Hergert, J., Gurt, J. and Gelléri, P. (2019). The Use of Snowball Sampling for Multi Source Organizational research: Some Cause for Concern. Personnel Psychology, 70(3), pp.635–673. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12169.
• Park, Y.S., Konge, L. and Artino, A.R. (2020). The Positivism Paradigm of Research. Academic Medicine, [online] 95(5), pp.690–694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093.
• Ranganathan, P. and Aggarwal, R. (2018). Study designs: Part 1 - an Overview and Classification. Perspectives in Clinical Research, [online] 9(4), pp.184–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fpicr.PICR_124_18.
• Saunders, R.S., Buckman, J.E.J., Fried, E.I., O’Driscoll, C.M., Cohen, Z., Ambler, G., DeRubeis, R.J., Gilbody, S., Hollon, S.D., Kendrick, T., Kessler, D.A., Lewis, G., Watkins, E.R., Wiles, N.J. and Pilling, S. (2021). The importance of transdiagnostic symptom level assessment to understanding prognosis for depressed adults: analysis of data from six randomised control trials. BMC Medicine, 19(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01971-0.
• Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Rehman, S.U. and Zafar, A.U. (2022). Adoption of green innovation technology to accelerate sustainable development among manufacturing industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, [online] 7(4), p.100231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100231.