Qualification Level 3 Diploma in Health and Social Care Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads549
• Pages17
• Words4300

Introduction:

Health and social care involves the provision of medical and social support facilities to people, paying attention on promoting health, preventing diseases, treating illness and offering care to the individuals with disabilities or long-term conditions. Health policy refers to the decisions, strategies and actions which are used to attain particular healthcare objectives. Public health policy plays a crucial role in protecting people and enhancing their health. Health policy emphasizes on developing guidelines which offers benefit to the service users within overall healthcare settings. The report is going to explain about the development procedure of the public health policy and different factors that impact the health across the country. The report will also discuss the possible advantages of enhancing people’s health. Further, the report will evaluate two health promotion models and their relevance in relation to developing awareness among the public. The report will also develop and examine the effectiveness of a health promotion campaign along with the possible barriers.

Aiming for top grades? Our Assignment Help For Students gives you expert guidance, custom-written solutions, and 24/7 support, all delivered before your deadline.

Task 1: Understand how public health policy is developed to improve the health of the population.

• Discuss the process for developing a public health policy
• Identify the potential groups who can influence public health policy
• Explain how the government monitors the health of the nation.

Scenario:

For task 1.1 you are required to research and analyse various established frameworks used in public health policy development. Moreover, identify and outline the key steps involved in these frameworks, as they will help you illustrate how public health policies are formulated and implemented.

Government drafts public health policy in order to obtain healthcare regarding goals in the society. In the United Kingdom, the development procedure of the public health policies is distributed into two stages such as; planning and implementation.

Planning

First step is to finding the problem, including causes, impacts and perceptions. Possible measures are also undertaken in order to address the issues. Researching and evaluating data and information to address the issues is the second step of planning (Nutbeam and Muscat, 2021). Policy makers and researchers utilise the data analysis approach evaluate statistics of affected group and disease occurrence. Policy makers also collaborate with stakeholders from different areas such as; healthcare experts and advocacy teams. After that policy makers develop goals, objectives, policy options and policy and final policy is studied by government authority. In final policy changes are incorporated then government department also recommend the same.

Implementation

The first task of implementation process is co-ordination and strategic planning which makes sure that policy follows the overall strategy of the government. Policy makers make the decisions regarding the best potential solution so that they can obtain the desired outcomes and goals (Health and Safety Executive, 2025). Evaluation and monitoring is one of the crucial process which performed in order to identify and evaluate the efficiency of health policy. They consider several questions such as; whether the particular public health policy enhanced the health and well-being of the society and if not then they find out the reason behind it and makes further changes in the existing policy.

For task 1.2 you need to identify and discuss groups that influence public health such as government agencies, healthcare providers etc. along with considering their roles and interests. For this, you can conduct interviews or gather insights from public health experts or policymakers to understand who they see as influential and why.

There are various groups which impact the public health policy such as:

Government and government agencies: Department of Health (DoH) has the power to influence the health policy. The department offers the strategic direction, sets out new laws and regulations of health and provides fund for the health campaigns or programmes. DoH is also responsible for making organisations work for health of society.

Pressure groups: It impact the government through various means like utilising media and organising rallies to demonstrate that they are working for public wellbeing (Gómez et al, 2021). They have right to condemn poor performance, conduct meetings to discuss agenda and protest against discriminating actions. Friends of Earth, Age Concern and Action on Smoking & Health are some examples of pressure groups.

International groups: World Health Organisation is the international group which is liable for coordinating various health agencies worldwide on international public health. WHO influences health policy through offering suggestions, providing advice, pressurising government and offering help for promoting the health.

National groups: National Health Service, Healthcare Improvement Scotland and Care Quality Commission are statutory authorities who play crucial role in applying the health policy (Lett et al, 2022). Professional bodies like Nursing & Midwifery Council and General Medical Council also impacts the health policies. Cancer Research UK and Public Health England are also national groups that influence the public health policy.

Other organisations and influencers: Diabetes UK, British Heart Foundation and Alzheimer’s Society are other organisations that help in bringing positive change within the society and impacts the policy.

To explain how the government monitors the health of the nation in task 1.3 you can research government health surveillance systems to understand how they collect data on population health indicators. Further, you can identify methods used by the government for health data analysis.

Public health monitoring refers to the collection of health data of the public to find out the possible health crisis and develop policies to enhance the health of the nation. It involves identifying the birth and death rate, spread of infections & viruses and public well-being. In United Kingdom, Public Health Monitoring and Reporting (PHMR) is responsible for monitoring the public health and it operates under the European Public Health Association (EUPHA). UK government pays attention on four factors such as; data collection, surveillance, research and consultation.

Data collection: The Health and Survey for England (HSE) is one source of collecting data on multiple health factors (Kritzinger et al, 2021). The UK government utilises this data to find out the common health indicators like birth and death rates, disease prevalence etc.

Surveillance: It is the collection, analysis and evaluation of health related aspects to control the associated risks. On the basis of outcomes of the data, the UK government then uphold strict investigation on health risks indicators as well as spread of infections and viruses.

Research: It refers to the study which is performed to find out the common reasons of health risk factors and identify possible solutions to some health problems (Theis and White, 2021). Government offers fund to support the research studies and inquiries of solutions to health issues.

Consultation: It is the process where different health care professionals such as; doctors, nurses, care providers and members of community involve in the decision-making procedure in order to develop inclusive health strategies.

Task 2: Examine factors that can affect health in the population

2.1 Discuss the factors affecting health across the nation

2.2 Discuss the potential benefits of improving health across the nation

In task 2.1, discuss the factors that influence the overall health of the population in a country; these factors may include socioeconomic status, lifestyle choices etc., However, you are not limited to these topics; you must include additional factors. Further, you can research this information from reputable sources such as government health agencies, academic journals, and health organisations to ensure accuracy.

Health refers to the situation of whole physical, mental as well as social wellbeing of an individual. There are different factors that impact the health in the nation and these factors classified into two factors which as follows:

Internal factors

Social factors: Poor social relations and variances in social status increase the issues like stress, anxiety, depression etc. However, good relation with the family and friends help in enhancing the health conditions.

Economic conditions: Poverty, low income and high education fees prevent the people to receive the best care that negatively impact their health (Hamed et al, 2022). Economic policies like raising the taxes on medicines can impact the purchasing power of low income people.

Environmental factors: Severe weather situations, poor housing quality, safe or unsafe working conditions and limited access to facilities like clean water affect health across nation.

External factors

Lifestyle changes: Being lazy can increase the risks related to health. For instance, an individual with the lack of physical activity has high possibility of having obesity.

Genetics: It also plays a role in impacting the person’s health. For instance, a person is likely to develop diseases like diabetes, obesity and heart related illness (Tang et al, 2022).

Eating habits: Poor eating habits like eating junk and unhealthy food also increases the risk of different diseases like heart stroke, obesity etc.

Individual behaviours: Someone’s own behaviour, outlook and belief can impact their health. For instance, a person with the lack of social communication or interaction can develop problems like social anxiety that can lead to mental health disorders.

Whereas in task 2.2, discuss potential benefits such as reduced healthcare costs, improved productivity, etc, along with other benefits resulting from better health, along with explaining how improved public health can lead to economic benefits for the nation.

Population health improvement is defined as procedure of offering enhanced medical and care facilities to the general public. Through adopting and applying this process, a substantial change in health of population can be observed. The process helps to fill the health related gaps and providing education to individuals regarding self-care skills can be helpful to make healthier workforce. Through taking preventive actions before spread of viruses and infections, governments can decrease the majority of health costs (Sheikh et al, 2021). Applying vaccinations strategies for preventing illnesses such as; smallpox, polio, chickenpox and measles in the children can facilitate in enhancing their life. If UK government invests more on enhancing health of people, then it helps in minimising health related risks and leads to fewer absentees. This will help in increasing productivity of the working people. Quality of life refers to the capability of a person to take part in life events physically as well as psychologically (van Kessel et al, 2022). Through paying attention on improving health outcomes directly impact the quality of life of people in a positive manner. Improving public health also lead to economic benefits. Both health and wealth are reliant on each other. A healthy population across the nation can drive the economic success by maximum workforce. In addition to this, an enhanced economy allows a government to offer the people with better medical and health care facilities. Through promoting good eating habits and offering equal access to health directly contributes to increased life expectancy.

Task 3: Discuss how Health promotion can influence individuals to adopt healthy lifestyles

3.1 Evaluate two models commonly used in health promotion

3.2 Assess approaches commonly used to increase public awareness.

For task 3.1, search models applicable to health promotions and select two of the identified models for evaluation. Critically analyse the effectiveness of each model by discussing the strengths and limitations while promoting health behaviour. For evaluation purposes, you can consider real-life examples where these models have been applied to promote healthy lifestyle changes.

Health promotion refers to the procedure of allowing individuals to increase control over, and to enhance their health.

Health belief model (HBM): The model was developed by Irwin Rosenstock in 1966 which largely utilised for understanding the people’s health behaviours. It involves several elements such as; perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits and barriers. The major strength of this model is that it concentrates on individual beliefs and perceptions that impact whether individual takes action to handle or prevent health issues (Yenew et al, 2023). For instance: A person with irregular blood sugar levels can perceive that they can have diabetes. It highly stresses on the cognitive factors and avoid social and emotional elements. For instance: An individual might not engage in the healthy behaviours such as regular exercise because of cultural norms which discourages the physical activity.

Theory of reasoned action: It was introduced in the year 1975 by Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen and utilised to find out the elements which can predict behaviours of individuals regarding health problems. As per theory, individuals act on specific health condition on the basis of their subjective norms, behavioural intentions and attitudes. It suggests that an individual’s behaviour is decided by their intention to conduct behaviour (Gundala et al, 2022). The major benefit of theory is that it describes why individuals act in a certain ways. For example: When a person likes healthy life, they stick to the healthy diet and lifestyle. However, the theory states that individuals make decisions according to rational thinking but does not consider that emotions and impulsive attitude can affect decisions. For instance: an individual has negative attitudes towards the smoking but still smoking because of habit.

For task 3.2, whereas for assessing the approaches to increase public awareness you can add details on how these approaches help in disseminating information and motivating individuals to adopt healthier lifestyles. Further, analyse each approach’s effectiveness, benefits, and limitations in raising public awareness.

Public awareness refers to the procedure of highlighting several issues in group of persons or bringing people’s attention towards some critical problems. There are different approaches related to increase public awareness.

Health education programs: Conducting excellent health educational programs within schools, colleges, community centres and public places is highly beneficial and powerful way to provide education to the children, students and common public on health behaviours (Aslam et al, 2021). Most of the education programs depend on traditional methods that reduce its effectiveness.

Community involvement: The participation of community in health programs is highly effective because people trust more on community members. However, community members are not skilled and have lack of knowledge about the health related factors. This limitation can prevent community to participate actively in awareness programs.

Influencer’s role: There are many influencers like motivational speakers, scholars as well as communication experts that considerably influence the common public. It is psychologically proven that people listen actively those to whom they consider their role models (Ocloo et al, 2021). But sometimes, influencers may misguide the people because of lack of knowledge that can negatively impact heath education programs.

Awareness programs: UK government organises the different awareness programs like seminars. They are highly effectively because seminars offer the opportunity for in-person interaction among the speaker and listener. Conducting programs like seminars are quite expensive and they can face budget funding issues. Budget related issues can intimidate the long-term effect of seminars.

Task 4: Develop and analyse the effectiveness of a health promotion campaign.

4.1 Produce health promotion material for a target audience

4.2 Deliver a small health promotion campaign

4.3 Analyse any effects of the campaign

To produce health promotion material in task 4.1, choose a specific campaign related to health and social care and target the audience by understanding their preferences and interests, then use tools like Canva or PowerPoint to design a clear, visually appealing poster with compelling messages highlighting the importance of the health topic. (Provide a self-made poster, avoid copying content from online sources).

Health promotion material refers to the material which is utilised to educate, support and motivate people and this material allows people to understand the significance of the health and embrace transformations accordingly to develop healthy choices.

Campaign topic

To promote healthy lifestyle among people and reduce obesity across the nation.

Target audience

The main target audience of this campaign is common public who are likely to be impacted by the health problems and are most expected to get advantages from the message of the health campaign.

The target audience of the health campaign are:

Children: The campaign targets the children through promoting the healthy habits and practices among children. If children eat healthy and stay physically active then they can reduce the chances of developing health issue like obesity.

Younger generation: The campaign target the younger people and motivate them to eat healthy and do regular exercise to stay fit (Meherali et al, 2021).

Old age people: The main target audience of the campaign are old age people because they have high risk of having obesity issue.

Objective

The message of the campaign is ‘Stay Fit and Live Well’. The objective of this campaign is to motivate the people to adopt healthy lifestyle and habits. Another objective of this health campaign is to minimise the obesity, especially in vulnerable people.

Content

Physical Activities

• Walking, running and cycling
• Dancing and swimming
• Participating in sports
• Doing yoga and exercise

Healthy Habits

• Eating healthy food
• Including fruits and vegetable in diet
• Eating and sleeping on time
• Waking up early
• Follow healthy lifestyle
• Do regular exercise

Obesity Symptoms and Causes

Symptoms

• Excessive body fat
• Frequent fatigue
• Joint pain
• Shortness of breath
• Excessive sweating
• Sleeping difficulties (Mayo Clinic, 2025)

Causes

• Poor lifestyle
• Family inheritance
• Medical conditions
• Unhealthy eating patterns
• Taking certain medications

‘Stay Fit and Live Well’ Symptoms · Excessive body fat · Frequent fatigue · Joint pain Causes · Poor lifestyle · Medical conditions · Unhealthy eating patterns · Taking certain medications

To fulfil the requirement of task 4.2, it is necessary for you to deliver a health promotion campaign by choosing the most appropriate methods such as social media or community events to reach your audience.

Qualification Level 3 Diploma in Health and Social Care Assignment Sample

Liked This Sample? Hire Me Now

Christian Wise 7 Years | PhD in Public Health

Objective: To encourage healthy lifestyle and minimise the obesity among public and contribute to community welfare.

Target audience: The main target audience of the campaign ‘Stay Fit and Live Well’ are children, young people and old age people. Through this campaign the target audience can be able to know about healthy habits, physical activities along with the signs and causes of the obesity which is risky disease.

Key influencers: The health care professionals and social media influencers are key influencers who help in effective delivery of the campaign. Motivational speakers also help in promoting health campaign (Ketelhut et al, 2021).

Resources required: Skilled professionals, online resources, media channels, printed materials and finance are some resources that are required for this campaign. Online resources use to find and collect the information. The budget allocates properly to all activities to execute the campaign effectively. The budget of this campaign is £10,000 and ‘Stay Fit and Live Well’ runs around three months.

Campaign platforms: Social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram will be utilised to run campaign so that more people take benefits of this campaign (Ghahramani, de Courten and Prokofieva, 2022). Community events will be also utilised where health care workers will educate the people about the healthy habits, physical activities and obesity disease.

Feedback and evaluation: The major focus will be on feedback and evaluation that help to identify any kind of issues and areas of improvements. Feedback and review will be collected by the influencers, experts and common people. They will provide honest review regarding campaign which helps in evaluating the performance of the health campaign.

For task 4.3, you are required to analyse how your health campaign affects adults, children and other age groups. This can be done by conducting surveys or interviews to gather information from participants regarding their awareness, knowledge, and behaviour changes as a result of the campaign. You will be assessed based on the results you will provide about how your campaign influenced the target audience’s health behaviours along with identifying any challenges encountered and lessons learned.

Effectiveness of the campaign

Effectiveness is explained as the extent to which the planned goals or objectives are accomplished or intended to be obtained. Evaluation of the effectiveness of campaign is crucial to know whether the desired outcomes. The several key performance indicators are utilised to identify health promotion campaign.

Awareness and knowledge: This metric is utilised to monitor how effectively a health promotion campaign is informing and educating the people regarding obesity and healthy habits. It evaluates the number of individuals who take benefits from campaign.

Behavioural changes: This KPI helps to evaluate the changes behaviours, outlooks and beliefs of the people regarding obesity after launching the campaign (Lopata et al, 2022). It tracks the participation of the common people in the campaign. The KPI also helps to monitor whether the targeted people are embracing the recommended practices related to health issues.

Community engagement: Through conducting survey and face-to-face discussion, the engagement of the community in health campaign will be evaluated. Through this metric, quality as well as impact of the obesity campaign on community will be tracked. It also helps to make adjustment in execution strategies if required.

Possible barriers

There are several barriers that may influence the capability of the people to take part in the campaign.

Physical barriers: People who lives in village and remote areas in which transportation services are rarely available may encounter difficulty to take part in health campaign.

Social barriers: Lack of support from family members and friends along with the cultural norms, beliefs and behaviours can hinder the readiness of the people to participate in campaign.

Lack of resources: Due to lack of resources such as; unavailability of transportation, mobile phones, internet etc. can act as a barrier (Pearce et al, 2022).

Lack of interest: There are many people who do not take high interest in the health related campaigns because of their busy schedule, especially working people. This barrier may affect the outcomes of the campaign.

Lesson learned

In order to reduce the barrier, the campaign will be also launched in the rural areas so that people take part in ‘Stay Fit and Live Well’ campaign in excessive manner. People who do not have knowledge about social media can also increase their awareness regarding healthy practices and obesity. Community members will be involved in this campaign so that more people participate and improve their life.

Conclusion:

As per above report, it is concluded that promoting health in the world is most crucial as it helps to increase awareness of the people regarding positive health behaviours and reduce the chances of having diseases and illness. It has identified that UK government has used systematic approach to develop the public health policy to enhance the health across the nation. The report has discussed different internal and external factors such as; social factors, economic conditions, lifestyle changes, individual behaviours and many more that impact the health of populations. Further, health belief model and theory of reasoned action are two excellent health models that highly contribute to promote and enhance health through motivating the individuals towards good lifestyle. The report has also developed a small health promotion campaign related to promote healthy lifestyle and reduce obesity. The campaign would be effective and educate the people to adopt good habits and behaviours.

Bibliography:

Books and Journals

• Aslam, B., Khurshid, M., Arshad, M.I., Muzammil, S., Rasool, M., Yasmeen, N., Shah, T., Chaudhry, T.H., Rasool, M.H., Shahid, A. and Xueshan, X., 2021. Antibiotic resistance: one health one world outlook. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 11, p.771510.
• Ghahramani, A., de Courten, M. and Prokofieva, M., 2022. The potential of social media in health promotion beyond creating awareness: an integrative review. BMC public health, 22(1), p.2402.
• Gómez, C.A., Kleinman, D.V., Pronk, N., Gordon, G.L.W., Ochiai, E., Blakey, C., Johnson, A. and Brewer, K.H., 2021. Addressing health equity and social determinants of health through healthy people 2030. Journal of public health management and practice, 27(Supplement 6), pp.S249-S257.
• Gundala, R.R., Nawaz, N., Boobalan, K. and Gajenderan, V.K., 2022. Does gender moderate the purchase intention of organic foods? Theory of reasoned action. Heliyon, 8(9).
• Hamed, S., Bradby, H., Ahlberg, B.M. and Thapar-Björkert, S., 2022. Racism in healthcare: a scoping review. BMC public health, 22(1), p.988.
• Ketelhut, S., Martin-Niedecken, A.L., Zimmermann, P. and Nigg, C.R., 2021. Physical activity and health promotion in esports and gaming–discussing unique opportunities for an unprecedented cultural phenomenon. Frontiers in sports and active living, 3, p.693700.
• Kritzinger, S., Foucault, M., Lachat, R., Partheymüller, J., Plescia, C. and Brouard, S., 2021. ‘Rally round the flag’: the COVID-19 crisis and trust in the national government. West European Politics, 44(5-6), pp.1205-1231.
• Lett, E., Asabor, E., Beltrán, S., Cannon, A.M. and Arah, O.A., 2022. Conceptualizing, contextualizing, and operationalizing race in quantitative health sciences research. The Annals of Family Medicine, 20(2), pp.157-163.
• Lopata, A., Gudas, S., Butleris, R., Rudžionis, V., Žioba, L., Veitaitė, I., Dilijonas, D., Grišius, E. and Zwitserloot, M., 2022. Financial data anomaly discovery using behavioral change indicators. Electronics, 11(10), p.1598.
• Meherali, S., Punjani, N., Louie-Poon, S., Abdul Rahim, K., Das, J.K., Salam, R.A. and Lassi, Z.S., 2021. Mental health of children and adolescents amidst COVID-19 and past pandemics: a rapid systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(7), p.3432.
• Nutbeam, D. and Muscat, D.M., 2021. Health promotion glossary 2021. Health promotion international, 36(6), pp.1578-1598.
• Ocloo, J., Garfield, S., Franklin, B.D. and Dawson, S., 2021. Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews. Health research policy and systems, 19, pp.1-21.
• Pearce, E., Jolly, K., Harris, I.M., Adriano, A., Moore, D., Price, M. and Ross, J., 2022. What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 98(1), pp.62-69.
• Sheikh, A., Anderson, M., Albala, S., Casadei, B., Franklin, B.D., Richards, M., Taylor, D., Tibble, H. and Mossialos, E., 2021. Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(6), pp.e383-e396.
• Tang, J.W., Caniza, M.A., Dinn, M., Dwyer, D.E., Heraud, J.M., Jennings, L.C., Kok, J., Kwok, K.O., Li, Y., Loh, T.P. and Marr, L.C., 2022. An exploration of the political, social, economic and cultural factors affecting how different global regions initially reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic. Interface Focus, 12(2), p.20210079.
• Theis, D.R. and White, M., 2021. Is obesity policy in England fit for purpose? Analysis of government strategies and policies, 1992–2020. The Milbank Quarterly, 99(1), pp.126-170.
• van Kessel, R., Hrzic, R., O'Nuallain, E., Weir, E., Wong, B.L.H., Anderson, M., Baron-Cohen, S. and Mossialos, E., 2022. Digital health paradox: international policy perspectives to address increased health inequalities for people living with disabilities. Journal of medical Internet research, 24(2), p.e33819.
• Yenew, C., Dessie, A.M., Gebeyehu, A.A. and Genet, A., 2023. Intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine and its health belief model (HBM)-based predictors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 19(1), p.2207442.